Just-in-Time Scheduling for Multichannel EPONs

We investigate optical network unit (ONU) grant scheduling techniques for multichannel Ethernet passive optical networks (EPONs), such as wavelength division multiplexed (WDM) EPONs. We take a scheduling theoretic approach to solving the grant scheduling problem. We introduce a two-layer structure of the scheduling problem and investigate techniques to be used at both layers. We present an extensive ONU grant scheduling simulation study that provides: 1) insight into the nature of the ONU grant scheduling problem and 2) indication of which scheduling techniques are best for certain conditions. We find that the choice of scheduling framework has typically the largest impact on average queueing delay and achievable channel utilization. An offline scheduling framework is not work conserving and consequently wastes channel resources while waiting for all ONU REPORT messages before making access decisions. An online scheduling framework, although work conserving, does not provide the best performance since scheduling decisions are made with the information contained in a single ONU REPORT. We propose a novel online just-in-time (JIT) scheduling framework that is work conserving while increasing scheduling control by allowing the channel availability to drive the scheduling process. In online JIT, multiple ONU REPORTs can be considered together when making scheduling decisions, resulting in lower average queueing delay under certain conditions and a more effective service differentiation of ONUs.

[1]  Joo Jung Min,et al.  Dynamic bandwidth allocation algorithm for next generation access network , 2006, 2006 Optical Fiber Communication Conference and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference.

[2]  Fred Baker,et al.  Assured Forwarding PHB Group , 1999, RFC.

[3]  Jong-Tae Lim,et al.  Dynamic bandwidth allocation algorithm in Ethernet passive optical networks , 2003 .

[4]  Sudhir S. Dixit,et al.  Dynamic bandwidth allocation for quality-of-service over Ethernet PONs , 2003, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[5]  M. Maier,et al.  Dynamic Wavelength and Bandwidth Allocation in Hybrid TDM/WDM EPON Networks , 2007, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[6]  Leonid G. Kazovsky,et al.  Success PON demonstrator: experimental exploration of next-generation optical access networks , 2005, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[7]  Ivan Andonovic,et al.  A WDM dynamic bandwidth allocation algorithm for EPONS , 2004 .

[8]  Ting Wang,et al.  Stability of Predictor-Based Dynamic Bandwidth Allocation over EPONs , 2007, IEEE Communications Letters.

[9]  Walter Willinger,et al.  Self-Similar Network Traffic and Performance Evaluation , 2000 .

[10]  Ting Wang,et al.  NXG02-3: Bandwidth Allocation over EPONs: A Controllability Perspective , 2006, IEEE Globecom 2006.

[11]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  IPACT: A dynamic protocol for an Ethernet PON (EPON) , 2002, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[12]  K. Shrikhande,et al.  SUCCESS: a next-generation hybrid WDM/TDM optical access network architecture , 2004, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[13]  Ahmet B. Keha,et al.  Bandwidth management for WDM EPONs , 2006 .

[14]  Ting Wang,et al.  Bandwidth Allocation over EPONs: A Controllability Perspective , 2006 .

[15]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  Supporting differentiated classes of service in Ethernet passive optical networks , 2002 .

[16]  J. Prat,et al.  Hybrid WDM/TDM PON using the AWG FSR and featuring centralized light generation and dynamic bandwidth allocation , 2005, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[17]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  WDM Ethernet passive optical networks , 2006, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[18]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  STARGATE: the next evolutionary step toward unleashing the potential of WDM EPONs [Topics in Optical Communications] , 2007, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[19]  B. Mukherjee,et al.  Simultaneous and interleaved polling: an upstream protocol for WDM-PON , 2006, 2006 Optical Fiber Communication Conference and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference.

[20]  Leonid G. Kazovsky,et al.  SUCCESS-HPON: A next-generation optical access architecture for smooth migration from TDM-PON to WDM-PON , 2005, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[21]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  Ethernet passive optical networks , 2005 .

[22]  A.R. Dhaini,et al.  Dynamic bandwidth allocation schemes in hybrid TDM/WDM passive optical networks , 2006, CCNC 2006. 2006 3rd IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, 2006..

[23]  U. Koren,et al.  A wavelength-division multiplexed passive optical network with cost-shared components , 1994, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[24]  Ronald L. Graham,et al.  Bounds for certain multiprocessing anomalies , 1966 .

[25]  L.G. Kazovsky,et al.  A highly flexible and efficient passive optical network employing dynamic wavelength allocation , 2005, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[26]  Van Jacobson,et al.  An Expedited Forwarding PHB , 1999, RFC.

[27]  Marco Ajmone Marsan,et al.  Multichannel Local Area Network Protocols , 1983, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[28]  Michael Pinedo,et al.  Scheduling: Theory, Algorithms, and Systems , 1994 .

[29]  Ahmad R. Dhaini,et al.  Quality of Service in TDM/WDM Ethernet Passive Optical Networks (EPONs) , 2006, 11th IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC'06).