Challenges of Digital Transformation in SMEs: Exploration of IT-Related Perceptions in a Service Ecosystem

Supported by a service ecosystem that is increasingly immersed into the digital transformation, SMEs have access to turnkey IT applications, which may come free of charge but not free of concerns. Using the group concept mapping (GCM) as the methodological framework, a concept map was estimated for a group of entrepreneurs in SMEs. Six main themes were identified as conceptual representations. The perceptions of the three main actor groups which interact in the ecosystem (i.e. entrepreneurs, IT specialists, socioeconomic support professionals) were estimated and compared. The analysis of IT-related perceptions shows entrepreneurs tend to rank as relatively more important the IT evaluation support identified on the concept map rather than the nature of the digital strategy to be implemented when compared with IT specialists and socioeconomic professionals. The discussion highlights issues of perceptions which vary among these interacting actors, and stresses the need to develop a shared understanding of IT challenges in a service ecosystem.

[1]  Grover S. Kearns,et al.  A Resource-Based View of Strategic IT Alignment: How Knowledge Sharing Creates Competitive Advantage , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[2]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  It's all B2B…and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market , 2011 .

[3]  R. Thorpe,et al.  Using Knowledge within Small and Medium-Sized Firms: A Systematic Review of the Evidence , 2005 .

[4]  Irene C. L. Ng,et al.  Service-dominant logic, service ecosystems and institutions: an editorial , 2018, Journal of Service Management.

[5]  Felix B. Tan,et al.  Aligning business and information systems thinking: a cognitive approach , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[6]  Frank W. Dewhurst,et al.  Linking organizational learning and customer capital through an ambidexterity context: an empirical investigation in SMEs1 , 2007 .

[7]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic , 2016 .

[8]  M. Zollo,et al.  Toward a Comprehensive Model of Organizational Evolution: Dynamic Capabilities for Innovation and Adaptation of the Enterprise Model , 2016 .

[9]  Stephen K. Callaway,et al.  More bang for your buck: Small firms and the importance of aligned information technology capabilities and strategic flexibility , 2007 .

[10]  Jeff Baker,et al.  Strategic Alignment in SMEs: Strengthening Theoretical Foundations , 2017, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Yuya Kajikawa,et al.  A review of the ecosystem concept — Towards coherent ecosystem design , 2017, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[12]  Adam Brandenburger,et al.  Value-based Business Strategy , 2005 .

[13]  Philip Powell,et al.  Contingent dynamics of IS strategic alignment in small and medium-sized enterprises , 2011, J. Syst. Inf. Technol..

[14]  William M. K. Trochim,et al.  The complexity of concept mapping for policy analysis , 2005 .

[15]  R. Grant.  Chapter 8 – Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 1999 .

[16]  Philip Powell,et al.  SMEs, co-opetition and knowledge sharing: the role of information systems , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  Strategizing information systems-enabled organizational transformation: A transdisciplinary review and new directions , 2012, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[18]  John M. Ward,et al.  Using resource-based theory to interpret the successful adoption and use of information systems and technology in manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Emilio Paolucci,et al.  How SMEs develop ICT-based capabilities in response to their environment: Past evidence and implications for the uptake of the new ICT paradigm , 2017, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[20]  S. Kelly,et al.  Relationship benefits: Conceptualization and measurement in a business-to-business environment , 2012 .

[21]  Blaize Horner Reich,et al.  IT alignment: what have we learned? , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[22]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service Innovation in the Digital Age: Key Contributions and Future Directions , 2015, MIS Q..

[23]  William M. K. Trochim,et al.  Concept mapping: an introduction to structured conceptualization in health care. , 2005, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[24]  Steven Katz,et al.  Concept mapping methodology: A catalyst for organizational learning , 2005 .

[25]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[26]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Enhancing Strategic IT Alignment through Common Language: Using the Terminology of the Resource-based View or the Capability-based View? , 2015, ICIS.

[27]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service Ecosystem Emergence from Primitive Actors in Service Dominant Logic: An Exploratory Simulation Study , 2018, HICSS.

[28]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[29]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Strategic Alignment and Misalignment of Knowledge Management Systems: A Social Representation Perspective , 2013, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  How to Develop a Shared Vision: The Key to IS Strategic Alignment , 2009, MIS Q. Executive.

[31]  Mary Kane,et al.  Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: a pooled study analysis. , 2012, Evaluation and program planning.

[32]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Factors That Influence the Social Dimension of Alignment Between Business and Information Technology Objectives , 2000, MIS Q..

[33]  Randy V. Bradley,et al.  The Role of Enterprise Architecture in the Quest for IT Value , 2011, MIS Q. Executive.

[34]  M. Zollo,et al.  Interest alignment and competitive advantage , 2007 .

[35]  Jan Muntermann,et al.  Paradoxes and the Nature of Ambidexterity in IT Transformation Programs , 2015, Inf. Syst. Res..