Does the distance between us matter? Influences of physical proximity to others on consumer choice

Individuals’ physical closeness to one another can either increase or decrease their preference for distinctive products. When individuals perceive their proximity to others to be voluntary, they are likely to interpret it as an indication of their affiliation motivation. Consequently, i na product choice task, they choose options that others consider desirable. When people perceive that their close proximity to others results from circumstances beyond their control, however, they feel that their personal space is violated and experience a need for to express their individuality. In this case, they are more likely to choose products that distinguish themselves from others. © 2011 Society for Consumer Psychology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

[1]  M. Hui,et al.  Perceived Control and the Effects of Crowding and Consumer Choice on the Service Experience , 1991 .

[2]  M. Lepper,et al.  The Construction of Preference: When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing? , 2006 .

[3]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[4]  D. Bem.  Self-Perception Theory , 1972 .

[5]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[6]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Embodied Grounding: Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscientific Approaches , 2008 .

[7]  D. Stokols.  On the distinction between density and crowding: some implications for future research. , 1972, Psychological review.

[8]  Rebecca K. Ratner,et al.  The Impact of Private versus Public Consumption on Variety-Seeking Behavior , 2002 .

[9]  D. Ariely,et al.  Sequential Choice in Group Settings: Taking the Road Less Traveled and Less Enjoyed , 2000 .

[10]  Robert S. Wyer,et al.  The Cognitive Impact of Past Behavior: Influences on Beliefs, Attitudes, and Future Behavioral Decisions , 2000 .

[11]  Jennifer J. Argo,et al.  Embarrassment in Consumer Purchase: The Roles of Social Presence and Purchase Familiarity , 2001 .

[12]  R. Zajonc.  SOCIAL FACILITATION. , 1965, Science.

[13]  Aparna A. Labroo,et al.  Half the Thrill Is in the Chase: Twisted Inferences from Embodied Cognitions and Brand Evaluation , 2010 .

[14]  R. Petty,et al.  Embodied persuasion: fundamental processes by which bodily responses can impact attitudes , 2008 .

[15]  J. Edney,et al.  Is There Reactance in Personal Space , 1976 .

[16]  P. Ellsworth,et al.  Effects of eye contact and verbal content on affective response to a dyadic interaction. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  H. E. Anderson,et al.  Sex, brain damage, and race effects in the progressive matrices with retarded populations. , 1968, The Journal of social psychology.

[18]  M. Patterson.  An arousal model of interpersonal intimacy. , 1976 .

[19]  H. Triandis,et al.  Individualism and Collectivism: Cross-cultural Perspectives on Self-ingroup Relationships We Wish to Thank Our Research Collaborators for Stimulating Ideas, Data, and Moral Support in Carrying out a Complex Set of Studies. They , 2022 .

[20]  Rui Zhu,et al.  Seeking Freedom through Variety , 2009 .

[21]  S. Albert,et al.  Physical distance and persuasion. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  R. Wyer,et al.  The cognitive impact of past behavior: influences on beliefs, attitudes, and future behavioral decisions. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Jennifer J. Argo,et al.  The Influence of a Mere Social Presence in a Retail Context , 2005 .

[24]  D. Bem.  An experimental analysis of self-persuasion☆ , 1965 .