A BEHAVIOR-BASED MODELING APPROACH TO REDUCING SHOREBIRD-SHELLFISH CONFLICTS

Bottom cultivation of mussels on intertidal flats is practiced throughout the world. This often generates conflicts between commercial interests and competing birds such as oystercatchers. At the Menai Strait, United Kingdom, the overwinter consumption of 242 tonnes (1 metric tonne = 1000 kg) of commercially harvestable mussels (>40 mm) by oystercatchers in 1999–2000 was worth £133 000 ($226 000 U.S. dollars). This represents 19% of the value of the landings. We used a behavior-based simulation model to predict the extent to which such losses can be reduced by novel commercial management practices, and to explore the consequences for the oystercatcher population. Simulations of novel lay management practices indicated that the losses of commercially harvestable mussels to oystercatchers can be considerably reduced by altering the shore level and/or extent of the commercial lays. We propose a novel management strategy for the bottom cultivation of mussels in intertidal areas. Seed mussels (15–20 mm) should...

[1]  A. Wilson,et al.  Effects of intertidal mussel cultivation on bird assemblages , 2003 .

[2]  B. Speiser,et al.  Food and feeding behaviour. , 2001 .

[3]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .

[4]  L. Zwarts,et al.  Prey Depletion and the Regulation of Predator Density: Oystercatchers ( Haematopus Ostralegus ) Feeding on Mussels ( Mytilus Edulis ) , 1981 .

[5]  J. Goss‐Custard,et al.  Field tests of the accuracy of estimating prey size from bill length in oystercatchers, Haematopus ostralegus, eating mussels, Mytilus edulis , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  Mark D. Bertness,et al.  Population dynamics of the ribbed mussel, Geukensia demissa: The costs and benefits of an aggregated distribution , 1985, Oecologia.

[7]  Richard A. Stillman,et al.  The Burry shellfishery and oystercatchers: using a behaviour-based model to advise on shellfishery management policy , 2003 .

[8]  E. Hunter,et al.  Intertidal migration by the shore crab Carcinus maenas , 1993 .

[9]  J. Altmann,et al.  Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. , 1974, Behaviour.

[10]  Andrew D. West,et al.  Predicting mortality in novel environments: tests and sensitivity of a behaviour‐based model , 2000 .

[11]  P. Herman,et al.  Secondary production of an intertidal mussel (Mytilus edulis L.) population in the Eastern Scheldt (S.W. Netherlands) , 1986, Hydrobiologia.

[12]  Richard A. Stillman,et al.  Predicting shorebird mortality and population size under different regimes of shellfishery management , 2001 .

[13]  Ralph T. Clarke,et al.  Deriving population parameters from individual variations in foraging behaviour. II: Model tests and population parameters , 1995 .

[14]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Deriving population parameters from individual variations in foraging behaviour. I: Empirical game theory distribution model of oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus feeding on mussels Mytilus edulis , 1995 .

[15]  R. Willows,et al.  Potential applications of mussel modelling , 2002, Helgoland Marine Research.

[16]  Adam Iomnicki,et al.  INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ANIMALS AND THE NATURAL REGULATION OF THEIR NUMBERS , 1978 .

[17]  Pieter Korringa,et al.  Farming marine organisms low in the food chain : a multidisciplinary approach to edible seaweed, mussel and clam production , 1976 .

[18]  R. Caldow,et al.  How to toughen up your mussels: using mussel shell morphological plasticity to reduce predation losses , 2003 .

[19]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[20]  Richard A. Stillman,et al.  Individual variation in intake rate: the relative importance of foraging efficiency and dominance , 2000 .

[21]  M. Depledge,et al.  Tidal and seasonal changes in the temporal and spatial distribution of foraging Carcinus maenas in the weakly tidal littoral zone of Kerteminde Fjord, Denmark , 1995 .

[22]  Richard A. Stillman,et al.  Density‐dependent starvation in a vertebrate without significant depletion , 2001 .

[23]  R. Stillman,et al.  Modelling interference from basic foraging behaviour , 1997 .

[24]  R. Clarke,et al.  FACTORS AFFECTING THE OCCUPATION OF MUSSEL (MYTILUS EDULIS) BEDS BY OYSTERCATCHERS (HAEMATOPUS OSTRALEGUS) ON THE EXE ESTUARY, DEVON , 1981 .

[25]  Richard A. Stillman,et al.  Individual variation in the competitive ability of interference‐prone foragers: the relative importance of foraging efficiency and susceptibility to interference , 1999 .

[26]  Uwe Walter,et al.  Efficiency of blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) spat collectors in highly dynamic tidal environments of the Lower Saxonian coast (southern North Sea). , 2003, Biomolecular engineering.

[27]  R. Seed.  The ecology of Mytilus edulis L. (Lamellibranchiata) on exposed rocky shores , 1969, Oecologia.

[28]  J. Goss‐Custard,et al.  Seasonal changes in the size selection of mussels, Mytilus edulis, by oystercatchers, Haematopus ostralegus: an optimality approach , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  B. Ens,et al.  The effect of an experimentally created mussel bed on bird densities and food intake of the Oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus , 1996 .

[30]  Richard A. Stillman,et al.  Predicting the impacts of disturbance on shorebird mortality using a behaviour-based model , 2002 .

[31]  J. Goss‐Custard,et al.  Oystercatchers and man in the coastal zone , 1996 .

[32]  P. Meire,et al.  Prey size selection and intake rate , 1996 .