The Forward Testing Effect on Self-Regulated Study Time Allocation and Metamemory Monitoring

The forward testing effect describes the finding that testing of previously studied information potentiates learning and retention of new information. Here we asked whether interim testing boosts self-regulated study time allocation when learning new information and explored its effect on metamemory monitoring. Participants had unlimited time to study five lists of Euskara–English word pairs (Experiment 1) or four lists of face–name pairs (Experiment 2). In a no interim test group, which was only tested on the final list, study time decreased across successive lists. In contrast, in an interim test group, which completed a recall test after each list, no such decrease was observed. Experiments 3 and 4 were designed to investigate the forward testing effect on metamemory monitoring and found that this effect is associated with metacognitive insight. Overall, the current study reveals that interim tests prevent the reduction of study time across lists and that people’s metamemory monitoring is sensitive to the forward benefit of interim testing. Moreover, across all 4 experiments, the interim test group was less affected by proactive interference in the final list interim test than the no interim test group. The results suggest that variations in both encoding and retrieval processes contribute to the forward benefit of interim testing.

[1]  N. C. Silver,et al.  Averaging Correlation Coefficients: Should Fishers z Transformation Be Used? , 1987 .

[2]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own? , 2009, Memory.

[3]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Examining the Testing Effect with Open-and Closed-book Tests , 2022 .

[4]  D. Schacter,et al.  Interpolated testing influences focused attention and improves integration of information during a video-recorded lecture. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[5]  H. Roediger,et al.  Interfering effects of retrieval in learning new information. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  Bernhard Pastötter,et al.  Using testing to improve learning after severe traumatic brain injury. , 2013, Neuropsychology.

[7]  D. Schacter,et al.  Overcoming overconfidence in learning from video-recorded lectures: Implications of interpolated testing for online education , 2014 .

[8]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  The interim test effect: Testing prior material can facilitate the learning of new material , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  Edwina E. Abott ON THE ANALYSIS OF THE FACTOR OF RECALL IN THE LEARNING PROCESS , 1909 .

[10]  Jason C. K. Chan,et al.  Studying on borrowed time: How does testing impair new learning? , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  Rosalind Potts,et al.  The benefit of generating errors during learning. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Ten benefits of testing and their applications to educational practice. , 2011 .

[13]  B. Sparrow,et al.  Google Effects on Memory: Cognitive Consequences of Having Information at Our Fingertips , 2011, Science.

[14]  K. Bäuml,et al.  The critical role of retrieval processes in release from proactive interference , 2013 .

[15]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Retrieval-Based Learning: An Episodic Context Account , 2014 .

[16]  Bernhard Pastötter,et al.  Retrieval practice enhances new learning: the forward effect of testing , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[17]  R. Bjork,et al.  Self-regulated learning: beliefs, techniques, and illusions. , 2013, Annual review of psychology.

[18]  K. Szpunar,et al.  Testing protects against proactive interference in face–name learning , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  D. Schacter,et al.  Enhancing attention and memory during video-recorded lectures. , 2015 .

[20]  Lisa K. Son,et al.  Learners’ choices and beliefs about self-testing , 2009, Memory.

[21]  Christopher A. Rowland The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: a meta-analytic review of the testing effect. , 2014, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  Adrian W. Gilmore,et al.  The role of test expectancy in the build-up of proactive interference in long-term memory. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  A Region of Proximal Learning Model of Study Time Allocation Journal of Memory and Language , 2005 .

[24]  Nate Kornell,et al.  Optimising self-regulated study: The benefits—and costs—of dropping flashcards , 2008, Memory.

[25]  C. Izawa Comparison of reinforcement and test trials in paired-associate learning. , 1969 .

[26]  J. H. Neely,et al.  Testing enhances both encoding and retrieval for both tested and untested items , 2017, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  K. Szpunar,et al.  Testing during study insulates against the buildup of proactive interference. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  John F. Nestojko,et al.  Expecting to teach enhances learning and organization of knowledge in free recall of text passages , 2014, Memory & Cognition.

[29]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  Why Testing Improves Memory: Mediator Effectiveness Hypothesis , 2010, Science.

[30]  J. Palva,et al.  New vistas for alpha-frequency band oscillations. , 2007, Trends in neurosciences.

[31]  Kathleen B. McDermott,et al.  Test-potentiated learning: distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  K. Bäuml,et al.  Retrieval during learning facilitates subsequent memory encoding. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  The Power of Testing Memory Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice , 2006 .

[34]  Simon Hanslmayr,et al.  Oscillatory brain activity before and after an internal context change — Evidence for a reset of encoding processes , 2008, NeuroImage.

[35]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Encoding fluency is a cue used for judgments about learning. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[37]  Shana K. Carpenter,et al.  Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[38]  Kathleen B McDermott,et al.  Expectation of a final cumulative test enhances long-term retention , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[39]  Mark C. Fox,et al.  When asking the question changes the ultimate answer: Metamemory judgments change memory. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[40]  Katherine A Rawson,et al.  Why is test-restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  R. Bjork,et al.  Testing facilitates the regulation of subsequent study time , 2014 .

[42]  D. Schacter,et al.  Interpolated memory tests reduce mind wandering and improve learning of online lectures , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Nate Kornell,et al.  Study efficacy and the region of proximal learning framework. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[44]  R. Bjork,et al.  Illusions of competence in monitoring one's knowledge during study. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.