Acoustic Mechanisms

The contribution of the middle ear air spaces to sound transmission through the middle ear in canal wall-up and canal wall-down mastoidectomy was studied in human temporal bones by measurements of middle ear input impedance and sound pressure difference across the tympanic membrane for the frequency range 50 Hz to 5 kHz. These measurements indicate that, relative to canal wall-up procedures, canal wall-down mastoidectomy results in a 1 to 5 dB decrease in middle ear sound transmission below 1 kHz, a 0 to 10 dB increase between 1 and 3 kHz, and no change above 3 kHz. These results are consistent with those reported by Gyo et al. (Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;112:1262-8), in which umbo displacement was used as a measure of sound transmission. A model analysis suggests that the reduction in sound transmission below 1 kHz can be explained by the smaller middle ear air space volume associated with the canal wall-down procedure. We conclude that as long as the middle ear air space is aerated and has a volume greater than 0.7 ml, canal wall-down mastoidectomy should generally cause less than 10 dB changes in middle ear sound transmission relative to the canal wall-up procedure. (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;118:751-61.)

[1]  James L. Sheehv Cholesteatoma Surgery: Canal Wall down Procedures , 1988 .

[2]  J J Rosowski,et al.  Mechanical and acoustic analysis of middle ear reconstruction. , 1995, The American journal of otology.

[3]  K Gyo,et al.  Effect of middle ear modification on umbo vibration. Human temporal bone experiments with a new vibration measuring system. , 1986, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[4]  M. Kringlebotn,et al.  Network model for the human middle ear. , 1988, Scandinavian audiology.

[5]  H. Schuknecht Temporal bone removal at autopsy. Preparation and uses. , 1968, Archives of otolaryngology.

[6]  John J. Rosowski,et al.  Cadaver Middle Ears as Models for Living Ears: Comparisons of Middle Ear Input Immittance , 1990, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[7]  J. Toner,et al.  Surgical treatment of cholesteatoma: a comparison of three techniques. , 1990, The American journal of otology.

[8]  Y. Onchi Mechanism of the Middle Ear , 1961 .

[9]  R. Friedrichs,et al.  Effect on Hearing Thresholds of Surgical Modification of the External Ear , 1977, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[10]  John K. Niparko,et al.  Anatomy of the Temporal Bone with Surgical Implications , 1995, Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery.

[11]  Jozef J. Zwislocki,et al.  Analysis of the Middle‐Ear Function. Part I: Input Impedance , 1962 .

[12]  M. Kringlebotn,et al.  The size of the middle ear and the mastoid air cell. , 1978, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[13]  J J Rosowski,et al.  Measurements of the acoustic input impedance of cat ears: 10 Hz to 20 kHz. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  J. Jerger,et al.  Studies in impedance audiometry. I. Normal and sensorineural ears. , 1972, Archives of otolaryngology.

[15]  A. Møller,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE OF THE MIDDLE EAR AND ITS TRANSMISSION PROPERTIES. , 1965, Acta oto-laryngologica.