Municipal WiFi and policy implications for people with disabilities

Access to information and communication nodes, wireless or otherwise, has become critical for full participation in contemporary US society, especially, for those with disabilities, the aging, or for those with other functional limitations. Wireless technologies, notably those deployed by municipalities, are being offered as one way to enhance access to society at large, including those who have been on the wrong side of the digital divide. This research aims to provide insight into the current state of municipal wireless network design and policies with regards to people with disabilities in the United States. In particular, the Americans with Disabilities Act's goals for the elimination of physical and communication barriers that prevent the disabled from participating in community life are examined through the guidelines established by Project Civic Access (PCA). A survey and comparative analysis was undertaken of a sample of 48 municipalities to ascertain the degree of accessibility to, or sensitivity of municipal wireless systems. Secondly, the effectiveness of goals toward eradicating the "disability divide" are analyzed to see if policies toward the disabled fair well as systems are deployed. Although many cities have entered into PCA compliance agreements we find that they are not necessarily going beyond the specific scope of the agreement, and in fact, the disabled are often further marginalized as large-scale systems undergo modifications throughout deployment. Because many of these people are already affected by disparities in education and income, the further marginalization of their communication and information constitutes a barrier to social inclusion within a community.

[1]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Telecommunications policy and individuals with disabilities: Issues of accessibility and social inclusion in the policy and research agenda , 2006 .

[2]  Nathan W. Moon,et al.  Access Barriers to Wireless Technologies for People with Disabilities: Issues, Opportunities and Policy Options , 2008 .

[3]  Mihir A. Parikh,et al.  Wireless broadband drivers and their social implications , 2003 .

[4]  Marvin A. Sirbu,et al.  Evolving wireless access technologies for municipal broadband , 2006, Gov. Inf. Q..

[5]  Daniel Callison Models (Part 1). , 2002 .

[6]  Paul Manuel Aviles Baker,et al.  Policy Bridges for the Digital Divide: Assessing the Landscape and Gauging the Dimensions , 2001, First Monday.

[7]  W. Lehr,et al.  Local Government Broadband Initiatives , 2003 .

[8]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Demystifying the digital divide. , 2003, Scientific American.

[9]  Zizi Papacharissi,et al.  Is broadband the future? An analysis of broadband technology potential and diffusion , 2006 .

[10]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Digital Divide , 2002, First Monday.

[11]  G. Goggin,et al.  Disabled e‐nation: telecommunications, disability, and national policy , 2004 .

[12]  Bambang Parmanto,et al.  A retrospective look at website accessibility over time , 2005, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[13]  Marvin A. Sirbu,et al.  Wireless is changing the policy calculus for municipal broadband , 2006, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  F. Bar,et al.  Municipal Wi-Fi Networks: The Goals, Practices, and Policy Implications of the U.S. Case (*) , 2006 .

[15]  John P. Robinson,et al.  NEW SOCIAL SURVEY PERSPECTIVES ON THE DIGITAL DIVIDE , 2003 .

[16]  Holly Yu,et al.  Web Accessibility and the Law: Recommendations for Implementation. , 2002 .

[17]  Ann E. Schlosser,et al.  The Evolution of the Digital Divide: How Gaps in Internet Access May Impact Electronic Commerce , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[18]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online Skills , 2002, First Monday.

[19]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  From the 'Digital Divide' to 'Digital Inequality': Studying Internet Use as Penetration Increases , 2001 .

[20]  Andrew Ward,et al.  Bridging Temporal and Spatial "Gaps": The role of information and communication technologies in defining communities , 2002 .

[21]  Karine Barzilai-Nahon,et al.  Gaps and Bits: Conceptualizing Measurements for Digital Divide/s , 2006 .

[22]  E. Hargittai,et al.  The disability divide in internet access and use , 2006 .

[23]  T. Seekins,et al.  Telecommunications access for rural Americans with disabilities , 1999 .