Probabilistic noninvasive prediction of wall properties of abdominal aortic aneurysms using Bayesian regression

Multiple patient-specific parameters, such as wall thickness, wall strength, and constitutive properties, are required for the computational assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture risk. Unfortunately, many of these quantities are not easily accessible and could only be determined by invasive procedures, rendering a computational rupture risk assessment obsolete. This study investigates two different approaches to predict these quantities using regression models in combination with a multitude of noninvasively accessible, explanatory variables. We have gathered a large dataset comprising tensile tests performed with AAA specimens and supplementary patient information based on blood analysis, the patients medical history, and geometric features of the AAAs. Using this unique database, we harness the capability of state-of-the-art Bayesian regression techniques to infer probabilistic models for multiple quantities of interest. After a brief presentation of our experimental results, we show that we can effectively reduce the predictive uncertainty in the assessment of several patient-specific parameters, most importantly in thickness and failure strength of the AAA wall. Thereby, the more elaborate Bayesian regression approach based on Gaussian processes consistently outperforms standard linear regression. Moreover, our study contains a comparison to a previously proposed model for the wall strength.

[1]  David A. Vorp,et al.  Towards A Noninvasive Method for Determination of Patient-Specific Wall Strength Distribution in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Pierce A Grace,et al.  The biaxial mechanical behaviour of abdominal aortic aneurysm intraluminal thrombus: classification of morphology and the determination of layer and region specific properties. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  G. L. Moneta Endovascular versus Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm , 2010 .

[4]  Christian Reeps,et al.  A continuum description of the damage process in the arterial wall of abdominal aortic aneurysms , 2012, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[5]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2011 .

[6]  P Regitnig,et al.  Effects of age on the elastic properties of the intraluminal thrombus and the thrombus-covered wall in abdominal aortic aneurysms: biaxial extension behaviour and material modelling. , 2011, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[7]  S. Weisberg Applied Linear Regression , 1981 .

[8]  G. Moneta,et al.  Comparison of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair With Open Repair in Patients With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (EVAR Trial 1), 30-Day Operative Mortality Results: Randomised Controlled Trial , 2006 .

[9]  Christian Reeps,et al.  The impact of model assumptions on results of computational mechanics in abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2010, Journal of vascular surgery.

[10]  W. Wall,et al.  A Comparison of Diameter, Wall Stress, and Rupture Potential Index for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture Risk Prediction , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Larry A. Taber To the readers of this BMMB/10237 issue , 2013 .

[12]  W. Wall,et al.  Towards efficient uncertainty quantification in complex and large-scale biomechanical problems based on a Bayesian multi-fidelity scheme , 2014, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology.

[13]  Madhavan L Raghavan,et al.  Biomechanical failure properties and microstructural content of ruptured and unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .

[15]  D. Brewster,et al.  Autopsy Study of Unoperated Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: The Case for Early Resection , 1977, Circulation.

[16]  P. Harris,et al.  Heterogeneity of Tensile Strength and Matrix Metalloproteinase Activity in the Wall of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms , 2004, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[17]  D. Vorp,et al.  The effects of aneurysm on the biaxial mechanical behavior of human abdominal aorta. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Katrin Uhlig,et al.  KDOQI US commentary on the 2009 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of CKD-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD). , 2010, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[19]  F. Härtl,et al.  Measuring and modeling patient-specific distributions of material properties in abdominal aortic aneurysm wall , 2012, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology.

[20]  Jonathan P Vande Geest,et al.  A Biomechanics‐Based Rupture Potential Index for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Risk Assessment , 2006, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Madhavan L Raghavan,et al.  Regional distribution of wall thickness and failure properties of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[23]  M. Thubrikar,et al.  Mechanical properties of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall , 2001, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[24]  J Swedenborg,et al.  Biomechanical rupture risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: model complexity versus predictability of finite element simulations. , 2010, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[25]  Jongeun Choi,et al.  Prior Distributions of Material Parameters for Bayesian Calibration of Growth and Remodeling Computational Model of Abdominal Aortic Wall. , 2015, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[26]  S. Khosla,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Peak Wall Stress in Ruptured, Symptomatic, and Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms , 2015 .

[27]  Félix M. Puchulu,et al.  Definition, Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus , 2018 .

[28]  A. Garg,et al.  Chronic kidney disease and mortality risk: a systematic review. , 2006, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[29]  M L Raghavan,et al.  Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  B. Jacobsen,et al.  Risk Factors for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A 7-Year Prospective Study: The Tromsø Study, 1994–2001 , 2009, Circulation.

[31]  Mark Sculpher,et al.  Long-term Results Of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) Versus Open Repair In Patients With Large Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Results Of The UK EVAR Trial 1 , 2010 .

[32]  K. Volokh,et al.  Comparison of biomechanical failure criteria for abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[34]  Barry J. Doyle,et al.  The Biaxial Biomechanical Behavior of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Tissue , 2014, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[35]  M. Webster,et al.  Ex vivo biomechanical behavior of abdominal aortic aneurysm: Assessment using a new mathematical model , 1996, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  T. Hassard,et al.  Applied Linear Regression , 2005 .

[37]  G A Holzapfel,et al.  Determination of constitutive equations for human arteries from clinical data. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[38]  M Karlsson,et al.  In vivo estimation of the contribution of elastin and collagen to the mechanical properties in the human abdominal aorta: effect of age and sex. , 2011, Journal of applied physiology.

[39]  E. Konofagou,et al.  Pulse wave imaging for noninvasive and quantitative measurement of arterial stiffness in vivo. , 2010, American journal of hypertension.