Quantification of Signal-to-Noise Ratio in Cerebral Cortex Recordings Using Flexible MEAs With Co-localized Platinum Black, Carbon Nanotubes, and Gold Electrodes

Developing new standardized tools to characterize brain recording devices is critical to evaluate neural probes and for translation to clinical use. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) measurement is the gold standard for quantifying the performance of brain recording devices. Given the drawbacks with the SNR measure, our first objective was to devise a new method to calculate the SNR of neural signals to distinguish signal from noise. Our second objective was to apply this new SNR method to evaluate electrodes of three different materials (platinum black, Pt; carbon nanotubes, CNTs; and gold, Au) co-localized in tritrodes to record from the same cortical area using specifically designed multielectrode arrays. Hence, we devised an approach to calculate SNR at different frequencies based on the features of cortical slow oscillations (SO). Since SO consist in the alternation of silent periods (Down states) and active periods (Up states) of neuronal activity, we used these as noise and signal, respectively. The spectral SNR was computed as the power spectral density (PSD) of Up states (signal) divided by the PSD of Down states (noise). We found that Pt and CNTs electrodes have better recording performance than Au electrodes for the explored frequency range (5–1500 Hz). Together with two proposed SNR estimators for the lower and upper frequency limits, these results substantiate our SNR calculation at different frequency bands. Our results provide a new validated SNR measure that provides rich information of the performance of recording devices at different brain activity frequency bands (<1500 Hz).

[1]  G. Aghajanian,et al.  Intracellular studies in the facial nucleus illustrating a simple new method for obtaining viable motoneurons in adult rat brain slices , 1989, Synapse.

[2]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Thalamocortical oscillations in the sleeping and aroused brain. , 1993, Science.

[3]  D. Contreras,et al.  Synchronization of fast (30-40 Hz) spontaneous cortical rhythms during brain activation , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Cellular and network mechanisms of rhythmic recurrent activity in neocortex , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  Italo Masiello,et al.  Architecture and callosal connections of visual areas 17, 18, 19 and 21 in the ferret (Mustela putorius). , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  M. Mattia,et al.  Population dynamics of interacting spiking neurons. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  Jerald D. Kralik,et al.  Chronic, multisite, multielectrode recordings in macaque monkeys , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  M. Baudry,et al.  Advances in Network Electrophysiology , 2006 .

[9]  David C. Martin,et al.  Chronic neural recordings using silicon microelectrode arrays electrochemically deposited with a poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) film , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.

[10]  Luca Berdondini,et al.  A microelectrode array (MEA) integrated with clustering structures for investigating in vitro neurodynamics in confined interconnected sub-populations of neurons , 2006 .

[11]  Jon A. Mukand,et al.  Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia , 2006, Nature.

[12]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Brain–machine interfaces: past, present and future , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[13]  Simon R. Schultz,et al.  Signal-to-noise ratio in neuroscience , 2007, Scholarpedia.

[14]  Maxim Volgushev,et al.  Detection of active and silent states in neocortical neurons from the field potential signal during slow-wave sleep. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  H. Markram,et al.  Interfacing Neurons with Carbon Nanotubes: Electrical Signal Transfer and Synaptic Stimulation in Cultured Brain Circuits , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Rosa Villa,et al.  Manufacturing and full characterization of silicon carbide-based multi-sensor micro-probes for biomedical applications , 2007, Microelectron. J..

[17]  John P. Donoghue,et al.  Bridging the Brain to the World: A Perspective on Neural Interface Systems , 2008, Neuron.

[18]  B. Botterman,et al.  Carbon nanotube coating improves neuronal recordings. , 2008, Nature nanotechnology.

[19]  Jeffrey D. Schall,et al.  Review of signal distortion through metal microelectrode recording circuits and filters , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  Albert Compte,et al.  Spontaneous High-Frequency (10–80 Hz) Oscillations during Up States in the Cerebral Cortex In Vitro , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Yali Amit,et al.  Single-unit stability using chronically implanted multielectrode arrays. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Warren M Grill,et al.  Impedance characteristics of deep brain stimulation electrodes in vitro and in vivo , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[23]  Chris Boldt,et al.  Creating low-impedance tetrodes by electroplating with additives. , 2009, Sensors and actuators. A, Physical.

[24]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Temperature modulation of slow and fast cortical rhythms. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Yuliang Cao,et al.  Electrodeposited polypyrrole/carbon nanotubes composite films electrodes for neural interfaces. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[26]  S. Luck,et al.  The effects of electrode impedance on data quality and statistical significance in ERP recordings. , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[27]  Steve M. Potter,et al.  Improving Impedance of Implantable Microwire Multi-Electrode Arrays by Ultrasonic Electroplating of Durable Platinum Black , 2010, Front. Neuroeng..

[28]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Exploring the spectrum of dynamical regimes and timescales in spontaneous cortical activity , 2012, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[29]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Carbon nanotube composite coating of neural microelectrodes preferentially improves the multiunit signal-to-noise ratio , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[30]  P. Leleux,et al.  In vivo recordings of brain activity using organic transistors , 2013, Nature Communications.

[31]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Carbon Nanotubes as Suitable Interface for Improving Neural Recordings , 2013 .

[32]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Smaller, softer, lower-impedance electrodes for human neuroprosthesis: a pragmatic approach , 2014, Front. Neuroeng..

[33]  J. Carrodeguas,et al.  Optical absorption response of chemically modified single-walled carbon nanotubes upon ultracentrifugation in various dispersants , 2014 .

[34]  T. Lucas,et al.  Transparent and flexible low noise graphene electrodes for simultaneous electrophysiology and neuroimaging , 2014, Nature Communications.

[35]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  NeuroGrid: recording action potentials from the surface of the brain , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  Rosa Villa,et al.  A SU-8-based flexible microprobe for close and distal recordings from the cortical network , 2015, Microtechnologies for the New Millennium.

[37]  Douglas J. Bakkum,et al.  Revealing neuronal function through microelectrode array recordings , 2015, Front. Neurosci..

[38]  Chunsheng Yang,et al.  Implantable electrode array with platinum black coating for brain stimulation in fish , 2015 .

[39]  Rosa Villa,et al.  Mapping brain activity with flexible graphene micro-transistors , 2016, 1611.05693.

[40]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Slow and Fast Neocortical Oscillations in the Senescence-Accelerated Mouse Model SAMP8 , 2017, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[41]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Flexible Graphene Solution‐Gated Field‐Effect Transistors: Efficient Transducers for Micro‐Electrocorticography , 2018 .

[42]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Bistability, Causality, and Complexity in Cortical Networks: An In Vitro Perturbational Study , 2017, Cerebral cortex.