GAS ontology: an ontology for collaboration among ubiquitous computing devices

Walker and Smelcer (Proceedings of the CHI 90, ACM, New York, 1990, pp. 221-225) found that menus could be selected faster if they were placed against the edge of the screen. Doing so creates an impenetrable border between the menu and the edge of the screen that the mouse cursor cannot penetrate. This changes how users move the mouse, so that selection times quicken compared to menus with a penetrable border. Experiment 1 investigated the effect that practice has on the acquisition of objects with and without impenetrable borders. The findings suggest that excessive practice was not necessary to demonstrate border type differences; thus, the advantage of having impenetrable borders seems to be relatively instantaneous. However, it was not readily apparent whether or not participants would realize the advantages of impenetrable borders without instruction. Thus, the primary purpose of Experiment 2 was to assess whether or not users would discover the benefits of impenetrable borders spontaneously. Participants were assigned to either the penetrable or impenetrable border condition. Additionally, participants received either full instruction concerning the benefits of the target placement, or limited instruction that simply informed the participant about the nature of the task. The results demonstrated that participants receiving limited instruction selected targets with impenetrable borders faster than participants who selected objects with a penetrable border. However, an exploratory comparison suggests that only 50% of participants who received limited instruction actually detected the impenetrable border. An additional comparison suggests that with practice the participants who were successful at detecting the impenetrable border selected the targets as quickly as participants who received full instruction concerning the benefits of impenetrable borders. The findings suggest that with full instruction, all users will perform reduced selection times. Given that not all participants discovered the impenetrable border it suggests that, whenever possible, users should receive instruction pertaining to the benefits of the impenetrable borders.

[1]  P. Fitts,et al.  INFORMATION CAPACITY OF DISCRETE MOTOR RESPONSES. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Michael Denny.  Ontology Building: A Survey of Editing Tools , 2002 .

[3]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[4]  R A Abrams,et al.  Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. , 1988, Psychological review.

[5]  Brian W. Epps.  Comparison of Six Cursor Control Devices Based on Fitts' Law Models , 1986 .

[6]  Munindar P. Singh,et al.  Agents on the Web: Ontologies for Agents , 1997, IEEE Internet Comput..

[7]  M L Lin,et al.  A Method for Evaluating Head-Controlled Computer Input Devices Using Fitts' Law , 1990, Human factors.

[8]  Leen-Kiat Soh.  Collaborative Understanding of Distributed Ontologies in a Multiagent Framework: Design and Experiments , 2003, OAS.

[9]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  A Roadmap to Ontology Specification Languages , 2000, EKAW.

[10]  Yolanda Gil,et al.  A Comparison of (Semantic) Markup Languages , 2002, FLAIRS Conference.

[11]  Robert E. McGrath,et al.  Ontologies in a Pervasive Computing Environment , 2003 .

[12]  Irene Mavrommati,et al.  Extrovert gadgets , 2005, CACM.

[13]  Neff Walker,et al.  Optimizing Speed and Accuracy of Menu Selection: A Comparison of Walking and Pull-Down Menus , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[14]  Harry Chen,et al.  An ontology for context-aware pervasive computing environments , 2003, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[15]  Michael Uschold,et al.  Ontologies: principles, methods and applications , 1996, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[16]  P. Fitts.  The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  Stuart K. Card,et al.  Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys, for text selection on a CRT , 1987 .

[18]  James A. Hendler,et al.  Agents and the Semantic Web , 2001, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[19]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Ontology Specification Languages for the Semantic Web , 2002, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[20]  Keith S. Jones,et al.  Factors Affecting the Usefulness of Impenetrable Interface Element Borders , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[21]  Stuart K. Card,et al.  User perceptual mechanisms in the search of computer command menus , 1982, CHI '82.

[22]  Neff Walker,et al.  A comparison of selection time from walking and pull-down menus , 1990, CHI '90.

[23]  Scott E. Maxwell,et al.  Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data , 1991 .

[24]  Stefan Decker,et al.  Creating Semantic Web Contents with Protégé-2000 , 2001, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[25]  Irene Mavrommati,et al.  An architecture that treats everyday objects as communicating tangible components , 2003, Proceedings of the First IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, 2003. (PerCom 2003)..

[26]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Movement time prediction in human-computer interfaces , 1992 .

[27]  Norbert A. Streitz,et al.  The Disappearing Computer, Interaction Design, System Infrastructures and Applications for Smart Environments , 2007, The Disappearing Computer.

[28]  Michael N. Huhns,et al.  Consensus Ontologies: Reconciling the Semantics of Web Pages and Agents , 2001, IEEE Internet Comput..

[29]  Natalya F. Noy,et al.  Component-Based Support for Building Knowledge-Acquisition Systems , 2000 .

[30]  Colin Ware,et al.  An evaluation of an eye tracker as a device for computer input2 , 1987, CHI 1987.

[31]  Roy H. Campbell,et al.  A Middleware for Context-Aware Agents in Ubiquitous Computing Environments , 2003, Middleware.