Emissions trading systems and social equity: A CGE assessment for China

Abstract Carbon dioxide emissions trading systems (ETS) are an important market-based mitigation strategy and have been applied in many regions. This study evaluates the potential for a national ETS in China. Using a dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model with detailed representations of economic activity, emissions, and income distribution, we examine alternative mitigation policies from now until 2050. Based on statistical and survey data, we disaggregate the labor and household sectors and simulate the impacts of ETS policies on the incomes of different household groups. We find that ETS has the potential to reconcile China’s goals for sustained, inclusive, and low-carbon economic growth. Results show some key findings. First, the number of unemployed people in energy-intensive industries such as coal and construction will continue to increase; by 2050, employment in the coal industry will decline by 75%. Second, if the scope of the carbon market extends to all industries in China, carbon market revenues will continue to increase, reaching a maximum of 2278 billion yuan ($336 billion) in 2042 to become the world's largest carbon market. Third, the distribution of benefits from the national ETS can help achieve greater social equity. By comparing different distribution policies, we find that the combination of targeted subsidies for unemployed coal workers and direct household subsidies based on proportional per capita will reduce the social income gap to the greatest extent compared with other scenarios. By 2050, this distribution policy will reduce the Gini coefficient in China by 10% compared to the Business as Usual (BAU) scenario.

[1]  David J. Mclaughlin,et al.  California’s New Gold: A Primer on the Use of Allowance Value Created Under the CO2 Cap-and-Trade Program , 2012 .

[2]  C. Hepburn,et al.  Auctioning of EU ETS phase II allowances: how and why? , 2006 .

[3]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Potential impact of (CET) carbon emissions trading on China’s power sector: A perspective from different allowance allocation options , 2010 .

[4]  C. Gini Measurement of Inequality of Incomes , 1921 .

[5]  S. Evans,et al.  Employment impacts of renewable energy policies in China: A decomposition analysis based on a CGE modeling framework , 2018 .

[6]  Dequn Zhou,et al.  Modeling economic performance of interprovincial CO2 emission reduction quota trading in China , 2013 .

[7]  Jingjing Jiang,et al.  The construction of Shenzhen׳s carbon emission trading scheme , 2014 .

[8]  Taehoon Hong,et al.  Benchmarks as a tool for free allocation through comparison with similar projects: Focused on multi-family housing complex , 2014 .

[9]  Ying Fan,et al.  How will a nationwide carbon market affect regional economies and efficiency of CO2 emission reduction in China , 2016 .

[10]  Ying Fan,et al.  The Economic Effects of Initial Quota Allocations on Carbon Emissions Trading in China , 2016 .

[11]  Andrew Park,et al.  Reflections on the Double Dividend Debate , 1998 .

[12]  Wei Li,et al.  The impact of emission trading scheme and the ratio of free quota: A dynamic recursive CGE model in China , 2016 .

[13]  Christoph Böhringer,et al.  On the Design of Optimal Grandfathering Schemes for Emission Allowances , 2005 .

[14]  Yue-Jun Zhang,et al.  The allocation of carbon emission intensity reduction target by 2020 among provinces in China , 2015, Natural Hazards.

[15]  Yu Liu,et al.  The Economic impact of different carbon tax revenue recycling schemes in China: A model-based scenario analysis ☆ , 2015 .

[16]  T. Hertel,et al.  Matrix balancing with unknown total costs: preserving economic relationships in the electric power sector , 2016 .

[17]  Lean Yu,et al.  Carbon emissions trading scheme exploration in China: A multi-agent-based model , 2015 .

[18]  Valerie J. Karplus,et al.  Emissions trading in China: Progress and prospects , 2014 .

[19]  Daiqing Zhao,et al.  The key elements analysis of Guangdong & Shenzhen ETS & tips for China national ETS construction , 2016 .

[20]  Toshihiko Masui,et al.  Achieving Copenhagen target through carbon emission trading: Economic impacts assessment in Guangdong Province of China , 2015 .

[21]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Auction design for the allocation of carbon emission allowances: uniform or discriminatory price? , 2010 .

[22]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Socioeconomic impact assessment of China's CO2 emissions peak prior to 2030 , 2017 .

[23]  Qian Wang,et al.  Carbon trading thickness and market efficiency in a socialist market economy , 2018 .

[24]  Walter Diewert,et al.  An Application of the Shephard Duality Theorem: A Generalized Leontief Production Function , 1971, Journal of Political Economy.

[25]  Wei Li,et al.  The research on setting a unified interval of carbon price benchmark in the national carbon trading market of China , 2015 .

[26]  Peter Cramton,et al.  Tradeable Carbon Permit Auctions: How and Why to Auction Not Grandfather , 2002 .

[27]  Lei Zhu,et al.  How will the emissions trading scheme save cost for achieving China’s 2020 carbon intensity reduction target? , 2014 .

[28]  Dunnan Liu,et al.  Can China achieve its carbon emission peaking? A scenario analysis based on STIRPAT and system dynamics model , 2018, Ecological Indicators.

[29]  Karoline S. Rogge,et al.  EU emissions trading: an early analysis of national allocation plans for 2008–2012 , 2006 .

[30]  Sheng Zhou,et al.  The influence of different allowance allocation methods on China's economic and sectoral development , 2018 .

[31]  Xin Wang,et al.  The economic impact of carbon pricing with regulated electricity prices in China—An application of a computable general equilibrium approach , 2014 .

[32]  David Johnson Australia's low pollution future: the economics of climate change mitigation , 2008 .

[33]  Lin Yang,et al.  A CGE analysis of carbon market impact on CO2 emission reduction in China: a technology-led approach , 2016, Natural Hazards.

[34]  Andreas Löschel,et al.  Designing an Emissions Trading Scheme for China – An Up-to-Date Climate Policy Assessment , 2014 .