Successful invaders co-opt pollinators of native flora and accumulate insect pollinators with increasing residence time.

Pollination mode is an important reproductive characteristic, often assumed to play a considerable role in plant species invasiveness. We asked (1) whether alien and native species differed in the frequency of pollination modes (insect pollination, self-pollination, wind pollination, water pollination), (2) whether the pollination modes affected the invasion success of two groups of aliens, differing in their residence time in Central Europe: archaeophytes (introduced before 1500) and neophytes (introduced more recently), and (3) whether there were differences in the diversity of insect pollinators of native species, and of alien species at different stages of invasion and with different residence time. The analysis was carried out using 2817 species occurring in the Czech Republic (1596 native and 1221 alien, the latter comprising 331 archaeophytes and 890 neophytes). Data were analyzed using generalized linear models. The alien flora introduced to Central Europe contained a higher proportion of insect-pollinated species than did the Central European native flora and linked to a higher diversity of pollinators per species. However, the frequency of pollination modes in the introduced alien flora gradually changed during the process of naturalization, becoming more similar to that of native species, and eventually, the naturalized species that became invasive did not differ in their frequency of pollination modes from native species. The frequency of self-pollination increased from casual through naturalized to invasive alien species. This suggests a remarkable role for pollination mode in successful invasions; indeed, self-pollination tends to support spread of neophytes more than any other mode of pollination. The range of habitats occupied by plants of different invasion status affected the diversity of insect pollinator species. In contrast, regional commonness of plant species only affected the number of pollinator functional groups. In native species and archaeophytes, there was a steeper accumulation of pollinator species with increasing habitat range than in neophytes. This indicates that groups of plants that have been provided with longer time to sample a wider range of habitats than recently arriving alien species have formed more associations with native pollinator species occurring in those habitats.

[1]  J. Biesmeijer,et al.  Multiple stressors on biotic interactions: how climate change and alien species interact to affect pollination , 2010, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[2]  I. Kühn,et al.  Changes in the Functional Composition of a Central European Urban Flora over Three Centuries , 2010 .

[3]  M. Vilà,et al.  Spreading to a limit: the time required for a neophyte to reach its maximum range , 2010 .

[4]  Felix Müller,et al.  Long-Term Ecological Research , 2010 .

[5]  I. Kühn,et al.  Differences in the trait compositions of non-indigenous and native plants across Germany , 2010, Biological Invasions.

[6]  Ignasi Bartomeus,et al.  Invasive plant integration into native plant–pollinator networks across Europe , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Petr Pysek,et al.  Planting intensity, residence time, and species traits determine invasion success of alien woody species. , 2009, Ecology.

[8]  I. Kühn,et al.  The global invasion success of Central European plants is related to distribution characteristics in their native range and species traits , 2009 .

[9]  F. A. La Sorte,et al.  Extra-regional residence time as a correlate of plant invasiveness: European archaeophytes in North America. , 2009, Ecology.

[10]  J. Biernaskie,et al.  Bumblebees Learn to Forage like Bayesians , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[11]  J. Olesen,et al.  Impact of Alien Plant Invaders on Pollination Networks in Two Archipelagos , 2009, PloS one.

[12]  Anna Traveset,et al.  A meta-analysis of impacts of alien vs. native plants on pollinator visitation and reproductive success of co-flowering native plants. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[13]  M. Vilà,et al.  Breeding system and pollen limitation in two supergeneralist alien plants invading Mediterranean shrublands , 2009 .

[14]  J. Pergl,et al.  Invasion success of alien plants: do habitat affinities in the native distribution range matter? , 2009 .

[15]  Wolfgang Nentwig,et al.  Will Threat of Biological Invasions Unite the European Union? , 2009, Science.

[16]  Richard Field,et al.  Coefficient shifts in geographical ecology: an empirical evaluation of spatial and non-spatial regression , 2009 .

[17]  Competition for Pollinators between Invasive and Native Plants: Effects of Spatial Scale of Investigation (Note) , 2009 .

[18]  M. Hill,et al.  The distribution of range sizes of native and alien plants in four European countries and the effects of residence time , 2009 .

[19]  S. Dullinger,et al.  Changes in the spatio-temporal patterns and habitat preferences of Ambrosia artemisiifolia during its invasion of Austria. , 2009 .

[20]  L. Cavieres,et al.  Positive interactions among plant species for pollinator service: assessing the 'magnet species' concept with invasive species , 2008 .

[21]  Ingolf Kühn,et al.  Climate change can cause spatial mismatch of trophically interacting species. , 2008, Ecology.

[22]  Ingolf Kühn,et al.  Correlates of naturalization and occupancy of introduced ornamentals in Germany. , 2008 .

[23]  Ingolf Kühn,et al.  Trait interactions help explain plant invasion success in the German flora , 2008 .

[24]  A. Traveset,et al.  Interspecific Pollen Transfer: Magnitude, Prevalence and Consequences for Plant Fitness , 2008 .

[25]  Ingolf Kühn,et al.  A comparative test of phylogenetic diversity indices , 2008, Oecologia.

[26]  A. Moro,et al.  Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends, geographical patterns and research needs. , 2008 .

[27]  Vojtech Jarosik,et al.  Separating habitat invasibility by alien plants from the actual level of invasion. , 2008, Ecology.

[28]  L. Cavieres,et al.  The presence of a showy invasive plant disrupts pollinator service and reproductive output in native alpine species only at high densities , 2008 .

[29]  Jan Pergl,et al.  Geographical and taxonomic biases in invasion ecology. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[30]  J C Stout,et al.  Factors Associated with Alien Plants Transitioning from Casual, to Naturalized, to Invasive , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[31]  D. Ackerly,et al.  Plant-pollinator interactions and the assembly of plant communities. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  Juan M Morales,et al.  Invasive Mutualists Erode Native Pollination Webs , 2008, PLoS biology.

[33]  Petr Pyšek,et al.  Traits Associated with Invasiveness in Alien Plants: Where Do we Stand? , 2008 .

[34]  M. Vilà,et al.  The comparative analysis of historical alien introductions , 2008, Biological Invasions.

[35]  Ignasi Bartomeus,et al.  Contrasting effects of invasive plants in plant–pollinator networks , 2008, Oecologia.

[36]  J. Manning,et al.  Phylogenetically Independent Associations between Autonomous Self‐Fertilization and Plant Invasiveness , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[37]  M. van Kleunen,et al.  Effects of Self‐Compatibility on the Distribution Range of Invasive European Plants in North America , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[38]  Ø. Totland,et al.  Do alien plant invasions really affect pollination success in native plant species , 2007 .

[39]  Jane Memmott,et al.  The impact of an alien plant on a native plant-pollinator network: an experimental approach. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[40]  P. Pyšek,et al.  Regional species pools of vascular plants in habitats of the Czech Republic , 2007 .

[41]  Ingolf Kühn,et al.  Relating geographical variation in pollination types to environmental and spatial factors using novel statistical methods. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[42]  Daniel A Griffith,et al.  Spatial modeling in ecology: the flexibility of eigenfunction spatial analyses. , 2006, Ecology.

[43]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  Invasional meltdown 6 years later: important phenomenon, unfortunate metaphor, or both? , 2006, Ecology letters.

[44]  A. P. Schaffers,et al.  Parallel Declines in Pollinators and Insect-Pollinated Plants in Britain and the Netherlands , 2006, Science.

[45]  D. Richardson,et al.  Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility , 2006 .

[46]  P. Edwards,et al.  Recognition that causal processes change during plant invasion helps explain conflicts in evidence. , 2006, Ecology.

[47]  Anna Traveset,et al.  Biological invasions as disruptors of plant reproductive mutualisms. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[48]  Hong Liu,et al.  Native and introduced pollinators promote a self‐incompatible invasive woody vine (Paederia foetida L) in Florida1 , 2006 .

[49]  Carolina L. Morales,et al.  Invasive mutualisms and the structure of plant–pollinator interactions in the temperate forests of north‐west Patagonia, Argentina , 2006 .

[50]  T. Fukami,et al.  Conceptual ecology and invasion biology : reciprocal approaches to nature , 2006 .

[51]  M. Williamson Explaining and predicting the success of invading species at different stages of invasion , 2006, Biological Invasions.

[52]  Frédéric Médail,et al.  Species attributes and invasion success by alien plants on Mediterranean islands , 2005 .

[53]  P. Pyšek,et al.  ALIEN PLANTS IN TEMPERATE WEED COMMUNITIES: PREHISTORIC AND RECENT INVADERS OCCUPY DIFFERENT HABITATS , 2005 .

[54]  Marco Vighi,et al.  ALARM: Assessing LArge-scale environmental Risks for biodiversity with tested Methods , 2005 .

[55]  P. Pyšek,et al.  Invasions by alien plants in the Czech Republic: a quantitativeassessment across habitats , 2005 .

[56]  P. Pyšek,et al.  Residence time determines the distribution of alien plants , 2005 .

[57]  J. Parnell,et al.  Pollination Ecology and Seed Production of Rhododendron Ponticum in Native and Exotic Habitats , 2006, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[58]  I. Kühn,et al.  Why do alien plant species that reproduce in natural habitats occur more frequently? , 2004 .

[59]  Michele R. Dudash,et al.  Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: Ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences , 2004 .

[60]  Steve Sutherland,et al.  What makes a weed a weed: life history traits of native and exotic plants in the USA , 2004, Oecologia.

[61]  J. P. Grime,et al.  The plant traits that drive ecosystems: Evidence from three continents , 2004 .

[62]  D. Richardson,et al.  Predicting and explaining plant invasions through analysis of source area floras: some critical considerations , 2004 .

[63]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[64]  Mark Williamson,et al.  Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists , 2004 .

[65]  Tina Heger,et al.  Predicting Biological Invasions , 2003, Biological Invasions.

[66]  M. Aizen,et al.  Does Invasion of Exotic Plants Promote Invasion of Exotic Flower Visitors? A Case Study from the Temperate Forests of the Southern Andes , 2002, Biological Invasions.

[67]  I. Kühn,et al.  Plant distribution patterns in Germany – Will aliens match natives? , 2003 .

[68]  A. Lausch,et al.  Native and alien plant species richness in relation to spatial heterogeneity on a regional scale in Germany , 2003 .

[69]  C. Mitchell,et al.  Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens , 2003, Nature.

[70]  P. M. Wade,et al.  The alien flora of Germany - basics from a new German database. , 2003 .

[71]  Jane Memmott,et al.  Integration of alien plants into a native flower–pollinator visitation web , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[72]  R. Mitchell,et al.  Competition for Pollination Between an Invasive Species (Purple Loosestrife) and a Native Congener , 2002 .

[73]  J. Olesen,et al.  Invasion of pollination networks on oceanic islands: importance of invader complexes and endemic super generalists , 2002 .

[74]  G. Quinn,et al.  Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists , 2002 .

[75]  Petr Pyšek,et al.  Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic (3rd edition) , 2022, Preslia.

[76]  Michael J. Crawley,et al.  Statistical Computing: An Introduction to Data Analysis using S-Plus , 2002 .

[77]  A. Prinzing The niche of higher plants: evidence for phylogenetic conservatism , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[78]  T. Tscharntke,et al.  Pollination, seed set and seed predation on a landscape scale , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[79]  L. Chittka,et al.  Successful invasion of a floral market , 2001, Nature.

[80]  M. Cadotte,et al.  Ecological and taxonomic differences between native and introduced plants of southwestern Ontario , 2001 .

[81]  James H. Brown,et al.  The paradox of invasion , 2000 .

[82]  D. Simberloff,et al.  BIOTIC INVASIONS: CAUSES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES, AND CONTROL , 2000 .

[83]  S. Barrett,et al.  A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants , 2000 .

[84]  C. J. West,et al.  Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions , 2000 .

[85]  M Rejmánek,et al.  Plant invasions — the role of mutualisms , 2000, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[86]  L. Chittka,et al.  Flower Constancy, Insect Psychology, and Plant Evolution , 1999, Naturwissenschaften.

[87]  P. Schönfelder Mapping the flora of Germany , 1999 .

[88]  T. Laverty,et al.  The effect of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.; Lythraceae) on the pollination and reproductive success of sympatric co-flowering wetland plants , 1999 .

[89]  J. Diniz‐Filho,et al.  AN EIGENVECTOR METHOD FOR ESTIMATING PHYLOGENETIC INERTIA , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[90]  M. V. Price,et al.  EFFECTS OF EXPERIMENTAL WARMING ON PLANT REPRODUCTIVE PHENOLOGY IN A SUBALPINE MEADOW , 1998 .

[91]  K. Gaston,et al.  Abundance–range size relationships in the herbaceous flora of central England , 1998 .

[92]  H. Rusterholz,et al.  Effects of elevated CO2 on flowering phenology and nectar production of nectar plants important for butterflies of calcareous grasslands , 1998, Oecologia.

[93]  A. J. Underwood,et al.  Experiments in Ecology. , 1997 .

[94]  I. Parker POLLINATOR LIMITATION OF CYTISUS SCOPARIUS (SCOTCH BROOM), AN INVASIVE EXOTIC SHRUB , 1997 .

[95]  Mark Williamson,et al.  The characters of successful invaders , 1996 .

[96]  M. Crawley,et al.  Comparative ecology of the native and alien floras of the British Isles , 1996 .

[97]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  New \'biodiversity\' measures reveal a decrease in taxonomic distinctness with increasing stress , 1995 .

[98]  P. Pyšek,et al.  Plant invasions : general aspects and special problems , 1995 .

[99]  I. Kowarik,et al.  Time lags in biological invasions with regard to the success and failure of alien species. , 1995 .

[100]  P. Pyšek,et al.  Relating invasion success to plant traits: an analysis of the Czech alien flora. , 1995 .

[101]  P. Forster Diurnal insects associated with the flowers of Gomphocarpus physocarpus E. Mey (Asclepiadaceae), an introduced weed in Australia , 1994 .

[102]  Michael J. Crawley,et al.  GLIM for Ecologists , 1994 .

[103]  W. N. Ellis,et al.  To make a meadow it takes a clover and a bee: the entomophilous flora of N.W. Europe and its insects , 1993 .

[104]  M. Kovanda,et al.  Flora of the Czech republic. , 1992 .

[105]  M. Pagel,et al.  The comparative method in evolutionary biology , 1991 .

[106]  James H. Brown,et al.  Macroecology: The Division of Food and Space Among Species on Continents , 1989, Science.

[107]  A. Snow,et al.  Floral Evolution: Attractiveness to Pollinators Increases Male Fitness , 1986, Science.

[108]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[109]  H. G. Baker,et al.  The Evolution of Weeds , 1974 .

[110]  H. G. Baker,et al.  Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. , 1965 .

[111]  H. G. Baker,et al.  SELF‐COMPATIBILITY AND ESTABLISHMENT AFTER ‘“LONG‐DISTANCE” DISPERSAL , 1955 .