Modeling the Gradual Degradation of Eventually-Consistent Distributed Graph Databases
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Paul D. Ezhilchelvan,et al. On the Degradation of Distributed Graph Databases with Eventual Consistency , 2018, EPEW.
[2] Daniel J. Abadi,et al. LEOPARD: Lightweight Edge-Oriented Partitioning and Replication for Dynamic Graphs , 2016, Proc. VLDB Endow..
[3] P. Sanders,et al. Recent Advances in Graph Partitioning , 2013, Algorithm Engineering.
[4] Jim Webber,et al. Graph Databases: New Opportunities for Connected Data , 2013 .
[5] Jeffrey Xu Yu,et al. Catch the Wind: Graph workload balancing on cloud , 2013, 2013 IEEE 29th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE).
[6] Ali Ghodsi,et al. Eventual consistency today: limitations, extensions, and beyond , 2013, CACM.
[7] Gabriel Kliot,et al. Streaming graph partitioning for large distributed graphs , 2012, KDD.
[8] Werner Vogels,et al. Eventually consistent , 2008, CACM.
[9] Werner Vogels,et al. Dynamo: amazon's highly available key-value store , 2007, SOSP.
[10] Nancy A. Lynch,et al. Brewer's conjecture and the feasibility of consistent, available, partition-tolerant web services , 2002, SIGA.
[11] Maurice Herlihy,et al. Linearizability: a correctness condition for concurrent objects , 1990, TOPL.
[12] Robert van Engelen,et al. Graph Partitioning for High Performance Scienti c Simulations , 2000 .