Determining the architectures of macromolecular assemblies

To understand the workings of a living cell, we need to know the architectures of its macromolecular assemblies. Here we show how proteomic data can be used to determine such structures. The process involves the collection of sufficient and diverse high-quality data, translation of these data into spatial restraints, and an optimization that uses the restraints to generate an ensemble of structures consistent with the data. Analysis of the ensemble produces a detailed architectural map of the assembly. We developed our approach on a challenging model system, the nuclear pore complex (NPC). The NPC acts as a dynamic barrier, controlling access to and from the nucleus, and in yeast is a 50 MDa assembly of 456 proteins. The resulting structure, presented in an accompanying paper, reveals the configuration of the proteins in the NPC, providing insights into its evolution and architectural principles. The present approach should be applicable to many other macromolecular assemblies.

[1]  Timothy F. Havel,et al.  A distance geometry program for determining the structures of small proteins and other macromolecules from nuclear magnetic resonance measurements of intramolecular1H−1H proximities in solution , 1984 .

[2]  S C Harvey,et al.  Prediction of the three-dimensional structure of Escherichia coli 30S ribosomal subunit: a molecular mechanics approach. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Ronald A. Milligan,et al.  Architecture and design of the nuclear pore complex , 1992, Cell.

[4]  P. Grandi,et al.  Purification of NSP1 reveals complex formation with ‘GLFG’ nucleoporins and a novel nuclear pore protein NIC96. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[5]  M. Radermacher,et al.  Architecture of the Xenopus nuclear pore complex revealed by three- dimensional cryo-electron microscopy , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  Determination of macromolecular homogeneity, shape, and interactions using sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation. , 1994, Methods in molecular biology.

[7]  G. Blobel,et al.  Isolation and characterization of nuclear envelopes from the yeast Saccharomyces , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[8]  J. L. Watkins,et al.  GLE2, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe export factor RAE1, is required for nuclear pore complex structure and function. , 1996, Molecular biology of the cell.

[9]  S. Wente,et al.  An RNA-export mediator with an essential nuclear export signal , 1996, Nature.

[10]  C. Akey,et al.  Three-dimensional architecture of the isolated yeast nuclear pore complex: functional and evolutionary implications. , 1998, Molecular cell.

[11]  J. Aitchison,et al.  Specific Binding of the Karyopherin Kap121p to a Subunit of the Nuclear Pore Complex Containing Nup53p, Nup59p, and Nup170p , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[12]  F. Vogel,et al.  Nup2p, a Yeast Nucleoporin, Functions in Bidirectional Transport of Importin α , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[13]  B. Chait,et al.  ProFound: an expert system for protein identification using mass spectrometric peptide mapping information. , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[14]  B. Chait,et al.  The Yeast Nuclear Pore Complex: Composition, Architecture, and Transport Mechanism , 2000 .

[15]  Ueli Aebi,et al.  Structure and Assembly of the Nup84p Complex , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[16]  M. Mann,et al.  Nup116p Associates with the Nup82p-Nsp1p-Nup159p Nucleoporin Complex* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  A. Krogh,et al.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  I. Macara.  Transport into and out of the Nucleus , 2001, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[19]  B. Chait,et al.  Automatic identification of proteins with a MALDI-quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[20]  H. Erickson,et al.  Cell adhesion molecule L1 in folded (horseshoe) and extended conformations. , 2001, Molecular biology of the cell.

[21]  N. Pante,et al.  Nuclear pore complex is able to transport macromolecules with diameters of about 39 nm. , 2002, Molecular biology of the cell.

[22]  Ueli Aebi,et al.  Modular self‐assembly of a Y‐shaped multiprotein complex from seven nucleoporins , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[23]  K. Weis.  Nucleocytoplasmic transport: cargo trafficking across the border. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[24]  V. Uversky,et al.  Disorder in the nuclear pore complex: The FG repeat regions of nucleoporins are natively unfolded , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Alan J Tackett,et al.  Genetic and biochemical evaluation of the importance of Cdc6 in regulating mitotic exit. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[26]  Ueli Aebi,et al.  Cryo-electron tomography provides novel insights into nuclear pore architecture: implications for nucleocytoplasmic transport. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  T. Earnest,et al.  From words to literature in structural proteomics , 2003, Nature.

[28]  F. Förster,et al.  Nuclear Pore Complex Structure and Dynamics Revealed by Cryoelectron Tomography , 2004, Science.

[29]  B. Chait,et al.  Components of Coated Vesicles and Nuclear Pore Complexes Share a Common Molecular Architecture , 2004, PLoS biology.

[30]  Brian T Chait,et al.  Targeted proteomic study of the cyclin-Cdk module. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[31]  E. Kiseleva,et al.  Yeast nuclear pore complexes have a cytoplasmic ring and internal filaments. , 2004, Journal of structural biology.

[32]  S. Emr,et al.  Cytoplasmic Inositol Hexakisphosphate Production Is Sufficient for Mediating the Gle1-mRNA Export Pathway* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  Frank Alber,et al.  Structural characterization of assemblies from overall shape and subcomplex compositions. , 2005, Structure.

[34]  B. Böttcher,et al.  Reconstitution of Nup157 and Nup145N into the Nup84 Complex*[boxs] , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  B. Chait,et al.  I-DIRT, a general method for distinguishing between specific and nonspecific protein interactions. , 2005, Journal of proteome research.

[36]  B. Chait,et al.  The nuclear pore complex–associated protein, Mlp2p, binds to the yeast spindle pole body and promotes its efficient assembly , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[37]  A. Sali,et al.  Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[38]  Ileana M Cristea,et al.  Tracking and Elucidating Alphavirus-Host Protein Interactions* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[39]  U. Aebi,et al.  Flexible phenylalanine-glycine nucleoporins as entropic barriers to nucleocytoplasmic transport. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Narayanan Eswar,et al.  Simple fold composition and modular architecture of the nuclear pore complex , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  G. Drin,et al.  A general amphipathic α-helical motif for sensing membrane curvature , 2007, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[42]  P. Philippsen,et al.  Molecular basis for the functional interaction of dynein light chain with the nuclear-pore complex , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[43]  B. Chait,et al.  The molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex , 2007, Nature.

[44]  Friedrich Förster,et al.  Snapshots of nuclear pore complexes in action captured by cryo-electron tomography , 2007, Nature.