UNSTEADY MECHANISMS OF FORCE GENERATION IN AQUATIC AND AERIAL LOCOMOTION

tion. First, analyses have become much more comparative, both across and within species. The great diversity of teleost fishes provides one of the best backgrounds for exploring the evolution of locomotor sys? tems at both the physiological and anatomical levels (see papers by Fish [1996], Westneat [1996], Gillis [1996], and Lauder and Jayne [1996] in this volume). By doing so, researchers are discovering new and diverse patterns of locomotory behavior. In addition to cross species comparisons, researchers are attempting to focus on the more subtle but equally important changes in swimming behavior within the ontogeny of single spe? cies (see paper by Hale [1996] in this vol? ume). The second reason for an alteration in perspective is that researchers are not simply satisfied with treating locomotion as a means of getting efficiently from one point to another, but also as a complex and flexible system of behavior required for feeding, courtship, and escape. In this new perspective, maneuverability is often con? sidered a more important design criterion than energy efficiency. And finally, the availability of powerful desktop microcomputers makes it possible to develop more sophisticated mathematical models of aquatic locomotion (see papers by Jordan [1996] and Fauci [1996] in this volume). Whether focused on juvenile salmon or

[1]  H. Schlichting.  Boundary Layer Theory , 1955 .

[2]  Moe W. Rosen.  Water flow about a swimming fish , 1959 .

[3]  Arnold M. Kuethe,et al.  Foundations of Aerodynamics , 1959 .

[4]  P. Callahan.  The evolution of insects , 1972 .

[5]  T. Weis-Fogh.  Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals , 1973 .

[6]  L. Bennett.  Clap and Fling Aerodynamics-An Experimental Evaluation , 1977 .

[7]  T. Maxworthy.  Experiments on the Weis-Fogh mechanism of lift generation by insects in hovering flight. Part 1. Dynamics of the ‘fling’ , 1979, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[8]  N. V. KOKSHAYSKY,et al.  Tracing the wake of a flying bird , 1979, Nature.

[9]  T. Maxworthy.  The Fluid Dynamics of Insect Flight , 1981 .

[10]  M. V. Dyke,et al.  An Album of Fluid Motion , 1982 .

[11]  Jmv Rayner,et al.  Momentum and energy in the wake of a pigeon (Columba livia) in slow flight , 1984 .

[12]  Geoffrey Spedding,et al.  The wake of a jackdaw (Corvus monedula) in slow flight , 1986 .

[13]  Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al.  Vortex flow visualizations reveal change in upstroke function with flight speed in bats , 1986, Nature.

[14]  K. Götz.  Course-control, metabolism and wing interference during ultralong tethered flight in Drosophila melanogaster , 1987 .

[15]  G. Spedding.  The Wake of a Kestrel (Falco Tinnunculus) in Flapping Flight , 1987 .

[16]  Peter Freymuth,et al.  Thrust generation by an airfoil in hover modes , 1990 .

[17]  J. Zanker.  The wing beat of Drosophila Melanogaster. I. Kinematics , 1990 .

[18]  A. Brodsky.  Vortex Formation in the Tethered Flight of the Peacock Butterfly Inachis io L. (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) and some Aspects of Insect Flight Evolution , 1991 .

[19]  Robert W. Blake,et al.  Fish without footprints , 1991 .

[20]  P. P. Morozov,et al.  Flow Visualization Experiments on Tethered Flying Green Lacewings Chrysopa Dasyptera , 1992 .

[21]  D. Grodnitsky,et al.  VORTEX FORMATION DURING TETHERED FLIGHT OF FUNCTIONALLY AND MORPHOLOGICALLY TWO-WINGED INSECTS, INCLUDING EVOLUTIONARY CONSIDERATIONS ON INSECT FLIGHT , 1993 .

[22]  WHEN DOES MOTION RELATIVE TO NEIGHBORING SURFACES ALTER THE FLOW THROUGH ARRAYS OF HAIRS? , 1994, The Journal of experimental biology.

[23]  A. K. Brodskiĭ,et al.  The evolution of insect flight , 1994 .

[24]  Dickinson,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF WING ROTATION ON UNSTEADY AERODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE AT LOW REYNOLDS NUMBERS , 1994, The Journal of experimental biology.

[25]  Lauder,et al.  KINEMATICS OF PECTORAL FIN LOCOMOTION IN THE BLUEGILL SUNFISH LEPOMIS MACROCHIRUS , 1994, The Journal of experimental biology.

[26]  C. Ellington.  Unsteady aerodynamics of insect flight. , 1995, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[27]  Frank E. Fish,et al.  Transitions from Drag-based to Lift-based Propulsion in Mammalian Swimming , 1996 .

[28]  George V. Lauder,et al.  NEW DATA ON AXIAL LOCOMOTION IN FISHES : HOW SPEED AFFECTS DIVERSITY OF KINEMATICS AND MOTOR PATTERNS , 1996 .

[29]  Liu,et al.  A computational fluid dynamics study of tadpole swimming , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[30]  C. E. Jordan.  Coupling Internal and External Mechanics to Predict Swimming Behavior: A General Approach , 1996 .

[31]  George V. Lauder,et al.  Pectoral Fin Locomotion in Fishes: Testing Drag-based Models Using Three-dimensional Kinematics , 1996 .

[32]  L. Fauci.  A COMPUTATIONAL MODEL OF THE FLUID DYNAMICS OF UNDULATORY AND FLAGELLAR SWIMMING , 1996 .

[33]  Mark W. Westneat,et al.  FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY OF AQUATIC FLIGHT IN FISHES : KINEMATICS, ELECTROMYOGRAPHY, AND MECHANICAL MODELING OF LABRIFORM LOCOMOTION , 1996 .

[34]  G. Gillis,et al.  Undulatory Locomotion in Elongate Aquatic Vertebrates: Anguilliform Swimming since Sir James Gray , 1996 .

[35]  Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al.  Leading-edge vortices in insect flight , 1996, Nature.

[36]  S. Vogel,et al.  Life in Moving Fluids , 2020 .