Escalation and premature termination in MIS projects: the role of real options

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine how the real option theory is applicable to evaluation of cases of escalation and premature termination of Management Information Systems (MIS) projects.Design/methodology/approach – The paper compares the implications of psychological and economic escalation theories with lessons from the real option theory as applied to MIS projects. Then, it examines published case studies, and discuss when project continuation enhances and reduces value for the manager and the firm.Findings – Escalation of commitment is continuation of an investment project after receiving negative signals. Escalation was identified as a significant problem in MIS projects often explained by the desire of the manager to avoid recognizing mistakes and to protect reputation. The opposite problem of premature termination of certain investment projects was also identified. This study argues that accurate application of real option theory is critical to distinguish between escalation and pr...

[1]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Behavior in escalation situations: Antecedents, prototypes, and solutions. , 1987 .

[2]  John Dickhaut,et al.  Escalation Errors and the Sunk Cost Effect: An Explanation Based on Reputation and Information Asymmetries , 1989 .

[3]  Brian DosSantos,et al.  Justifying Investments in New Information Technologies , 1991, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Mark Keil,et al.  Pulling the Plug: Software Project Management and the Problem of Project Escalation , 1995, MIS Q..

[5]  Ram L. Kumar,et al.  A Note on Project Risk and Option Values of Investments in Information Technologies , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Mark Keil,et al.  Turning Around Troubled Software Projects: An Exploratory Study of the Deescalation of Commitment to Failing Courses of Action , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Roberto A. Weber,et al.  The econometrics and behavioral economics of escalation of commitment: a re-examination of Staw and Hoang’s NBA data , 1999 .

[8]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  A Case for Using Real Options Pricing Analysis to Evaluate Information Technology Project Investments , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Mark Keil,et al.  Why Software Projects Escalate: An Empirical Analysis and Test of Four Theoretical Models , 2000, MIS Q..

[10]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Justifying Electronic Banking Network Expansion Using Real Options Analysis , 2000, MIS Q..

[11]  Alfred Taudes,et al.  Options Analysis of Software Platform Decisions: A Case Study , 2000, MIS Q..

[12]  Edward H. Bowman,et al.  Real Options Analysis and Strategic Decision Making , 2001 .

[13]  Joseph Natovich,et al.  Vendor Related Risks in IT Development: A Chronology of an Outsourced Project Failure , 2003, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[14]  Helga Drummond,et al.  What we never have, we never miss? Decision error and the risks of premature termination , 2005, J. Inf. Technol..

[15]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Information Systems Project Continuation in Escalation Situations: A Real Options Model , 2006, Decis. Sci..

[16]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Option-Based Risk Management: A Field Study of Sequential Information Technology Investment Decisions , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Mark Keil,et al.  Information Technology Project Escalation: A Process Model , 2008, Decis. Sci..