Exploration of EDTA sodium salt as novel draw solution in forward osmosis process for dewatering of high nutrient sludge

Abstract In this study, a hybrid forward osmosis–nanofiltration (FO/NF) process was designed for dewatering high nutrient containing sludge and recovering draw solution with minimum energy as well as low fouling. A novel draw solution – EDTA sodium salt – was also systematically studied for dewatering process. Results show that using EDTA sodium salt produced higher water flux and lower reverse salt flux when compared to conventional inorganic salt (NaCl) at pH 8. The final sludge concentration reached 32,000 mg/L after 16 h of operation. Moreover, nutrient compounds in sludge were successfully removed by the FO membrane with a removal efficiency of approximately 97% of NH 4 + –N, 90% of NO 3 − –N, 97% of NO 2 − –N and 99% of PO 4 3 − –P, which was attributed to the multi-barrier layers of sludge forming on membrane surface and the steric effect of the FO membrane. The NF recovery of EDTA sodium salt indicated that all NF membranes performed well and TS-80 was the best among the tested membranes.

[1]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Coupled reverse draw solute permeation and water flux in forward osmosis with neutral draw solutes , 2012 .

[2]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[3]  Kai Yu Wang,et al.  Study of draw solutes using 2-methylimidazole-based compounds in forward osmosis , 2010 .

[4]  H. Ngo,et al.  A mini-review on membrane fouling. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[5]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Forward osmosis for concentration of anaerobic digester centrate. , 2007, Water research.

[6]  Perry L. McCarty,et al.  Chemistry for environmental engineering and science , 2002 .

[7]  R. C. Weast.  CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics , 1973 .

[8]  Gary L. Amy,et al.  Hydrophilic Superparamagnetic Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterization, and Performance in Forward Osmosis Processes , 2011 .

[9]  Shiao‐Shing Chen,et al.  Application of forward osmosis on dewatering of high nutrient sludge. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[10]  Pierre Le-Clech,et al.  Trace organic solutes in closed-loop forward osmosis applications: influence of membrane fouling and modeling of solute build-up. , 2013, Water research.

[11]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Effect of draw solution concentration and operating conditions on forward osmosis and pressure retarded osmosis performance in a spiral wound module , 2010 .

[12]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Removal of natural steroid hormones from wastewater using membrane contactor processes. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Mark L. Stone,et al.  An initial study of hexavalent phosphazene salts as draw solutes in forward osmosis , 2013 .

[14]  K. D. Collins,et al.  Dynamic hydration numbers for biologically important ions. , 2002, Biophysical chemistry.

[15]  Jincai Su,et al.  Exploration of polyelectrolytes as draw solutes in forward osmosis processes. , 2012, Water research.

[16]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: A low fouling alternative to MBR processes , 2009 .

[17]  Johannes S. Vrouwenvelder,et al.  Water harvesting from municipal wastewater via osmotic gradient: An evaluation of process performance , 2013 .

[18]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Energy requirements of ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis desalination , 2007 .

[19]  M. Afonso,et al.  Concentration of clavulanic acid broths: Influence of the membrane surface charge density on NF operation , 2006 .

[20]  S. Nakao,et al.  The electrostatic and steric-hindrance model for the transport of charged solutes through nanofiltration membranes , 1997 .

[21]  Victor Yangali-Quintanilla,et al.  Rejection of micropollutants by clean and fouled forward osmosis membrane. , 2011, Water research.

[22]  Kai Yu Wang,et al.  Highly Water-Soluble Magnetic Nanoparticles as Novel Draw Solutes in Forward Osmosis for Water Reuse , 2010 .

[23]  Ahmed Aidan,et al.  Copper sulfate as draw solute in forward osmosis desalination , 2013 .

[24]  Tai‐Shung Chung,et al.  Draw solutions for forward osmosis processes: Developments, challenges, and prospects for the future , 2013 .

[25]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Comparison of the removal of hydrophobic trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis. , 2012, Water research.

[26]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Fouling control in a forward osmosis process integrating seawater desalination and wastewater reclamation , 2013 .

[27]  H. Bai,et al.  Highly water soluble and recovered dextran coated Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles for brackish water desalination , 2011 .

[28]  Michael D. Guiver,et al.  Polyamide thin-film composite membranes based on carboxylated polysulfone microporous support membranes for forward osmosis , 2013 .

[29]  W. Pusch,et al.  Relation between salt rejection r and reflection coefficient σ of asymmetric cellulose acetate membranes , 1974 .

[30]  Xia Huang,et al.  Feasibility of applying forward osmosis to the simultaneous thickening, digestion, and direct dewatering of waste activated sludge. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[31]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Forward osmosis with a novel thin-film inorganic membrane. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[32]  Ahmed Aidan,et al.  Draw solute recovery by metathesis precipitation in forward osmosis desalination. , 2013 .

[33]  Shiao‐Shing Chen,et al.  Recovery of chromate from spent plating solutions by two-stage nanofiltration processes , 2008 .

[34]  Wei-Ning Wang,et al.  Experimental investigation on separation performance of nanofiltration membranes for inorganic electrolyte solutions , 2002 .

[35]  Frederick F. Stewart,et al.  Deriving osmotic pressures of draw solutes used in osmotically driven membrane processes , 2013 .

[36]  Seockheon Lee,et al.  Modeling reverse draw solute flux in forward osmosis with external concentration polarization in both sides of the draw and feed solution , 2013 .

[37]  H. Ng,et al.  Revised external and internal concentration polarization models to improve flux prediction in forward osmosis process , 2013 .

[38]  Jacob N. Israelachvili,et al.  Intermolecular and surface forces : with applications to colloidal and biological systems , 1985 .

[39]  Long D. Nghiem,et al.  Rejection of pharmaceutically active compounds by forward osmosis: Role of solution pH and membrane orientation , 2012 .

[40]  Mark L. Stone,et al.  SWITCHABLE POLARITY SOLVENTS AS DRAW SOLUTES FOR FORWARD OSMOSIS , 2013 .

[41]  C. Vandecasteele,et al.  Evaluating the charge of nanofiltration membranes , 2001 .

[42]  Jincai Su,et al.  Sublayer structure and reflection coefficient and their effects on concentration polarization and me , 2011 .

[43]  Sui Zhang,et al.  Thin film composite forward osmosis membranes based on polydopamine modified polysulfone substrates with enhancements in both water flux and salt rejection , 2012 .