Justice ‘Under’ Law: The Bodily Incarnation of Legal Conceptions Over Time

AbstractThe article uses embodiment and the experiential basis of conceptual metaphor to argue for the metaphorical essence of abstract legal thought. Abstract concepts like ‘law’ and ‘justice’ need to borrow from a spatial, bodily, or physical prototype in order to be conceptualised, seen, for example, in the fact that justice preferably is found ‘under’ law. Three conceptual categories of how law is conceptualised is examined: law as an object, law as a vertical relation, and law as an area. The Google Ngram Viewer, based on the massive library of books that Google has scanned, has been used to study legally relevant conceptions over time within each of these three categories, from 1800 to 2000. In addition, the article suggests a type of analytical method of ‘metaphor triangulation,’ that is, the replacement of prevailing metaphors with unusual ones in order to increase the level of awareness of what conceptual content the prevailing metaphors involve.

[1]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[2]  Stefan Larsson.  The Path Dependence of European Copyright , 2011 .

[3]  Steven L. Winter.  The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought: What is the “color” of law? , 2008 .

[4]  B. Santos.  Three Metaphors for a New Conception of Law: the Frontier, the Baroque and the South , 1995 .

[5]  Eric Gossett,et al.  Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think , 2015 .

[6]  Linda L. Berger.  What is the Sound of a Corporation Speaking? How the Cognitive Theory of Metaphor Can Help Lawyers Shape the Law , 2004 .

[7]  Steven L. Winter.  Re-Embodying Law , 2006 .

[8]  Z. Kövecses,et al.  Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation , 2005 .

[9]  G. Lakoff.  The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor , 1993 .

[10]  N. Yu.  The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought: Metaphor from body and culture , 2008 .

[11]  Stefan Larsson.  Rätten som rum, kropp och kontext - Det konceptuella förtingligandets rättsvetenskapliga relevans , 2013 .

[12]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .

[13]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .

[14]  Stefan Larsson,et al.  Karl Renner and (Intellectual) Property – How Cognitive Theory Can Enrich a Sociolegal Analysis of Contemporary Copyright , 2014 .

[15]  Yadira Espinal.  Viktor Mayer-Schonberger and Kenneth Cukier, Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work and Think , 2013 .

[16]  C. Hutton.  Meaning, Time and the Law: Ex Post and Ex Ante Perspectives , 2009 .

[17]  Stefan Larsson,et al.  Conceptions in the Code: What “The Copyright Wars” Tell us about Creativity, Social Change and Normative Conflicts in the digital society , 2012 .

[18]  R. Gibbs.  Embodiment and Cognitive Science: Concepts , 2005 .

[19]  Z. Kövecses,et al.  Metaphor in Culture: Metaphor in Culture , 2005 .

[20]  E. Rosch,et al.  Cognition and Categorization , 1980 .

[21]  S. Glucksberg.  The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought: How metaphors create categories – quickly , 2008 .

[22]  George Lakoff,et al.  A Figure of Thought , 1986 .

[23]  Steven L. Winter.  A Clearing in the Forest: Law, Life, and Mind , 2001 .

[24]  Mark L. Johnson.  The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning , 1987 .

[25]  Stefan Larsson,et al.  Metaphors, law and digital phenomena: the Swedish pirate bay court case , 2013, Int. J. Law Inf. Technol..

[26]  D. G. MacKay,et al.  Metaphor and Thought , 1980 .

[27]  Zoltán Kövecses,et al.  Conceptual metaphor theory: Some criticisms and alternative proposals , 2008 .

[28]  Stefan Larsson,et al.  Copy Me Happy: The Metaphoric Expansion of Copyright in a Digital Society , 2013 .

[29]  G. Lakoff.  Women, fire, and dangerous things : what categories reveal about the mind , 1989 .

[30]  Steven L. Winter.  Frame Semantics and the ‘Internal Point of View’ , 2013 .

[31]  D. Damjanovic,et al.  Welfare Integration through EU Law: The Overall Picture in the Light of the Lisbon Treaty , 2008 .

[32]  Robert L. Tsai.  Fire, Metaphor, and Constitutional Myth-Making , 2004 .

[33]  John S. Werner,et al.  What is color? , 2002, Other Conferences.

[34]  Viktor Mayer-Schnberger,et al.  Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think , 2013 .

[35]  N. Presmeg.  The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason , 1992 .

[36]  B. Santos.  Law: A Map of Misreading. Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law , 1987 .

[37]  Stefan Larsson,et al.  Conceptions, Categories and Embodiment: Why Metaphors are of Fundamental Importance for Understanding Norms , 2013 .

[38]  Richard W. Murrow,et al.  A Biosemiotic Body of Law: The Neurobiology of Justice , 2013 .

[39]  James Griffin,et al.  The regulation of online extreme pornography: purposive teleology (in)action , 2013, Int. J. Law Inf. Technol..

[40]  S. Burton.  The path of law and its influence : the legacy of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. , 2000 .

[41]  Linda L. Berger.  How Embedded Knowledge Structures Affect Judicial Decision Making: An Analysis of Metaphor, Narrative, and Imagination in Child Custody Disputes , 2008 .

[42]  R. Gibbs.  The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought , 2008 .

[43]  Linda L. Berger.  HOW EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE STRUCTURES AFFECT JUDICIAL DECISION MAKING : A RHETORICAL ANALYSIS OF METAPHOR , NARRATIVE , AND IMAGINATION IN CHILD CUSTODY DISPUTES , 2009 .

[44]  E. Rosch.  Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .

[45]  Stefan Larsson,et al.  Metaforerna och Rätten , 2012 .

[46]  S. Larsson.  Metaphors and Norms - Understanding Copyright Law in a Digital Society , 2011 .

[47]  Mark L. Johnson.  Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics , 1993 .