Bacterial Contamination of Keyboards: Efficacy and Functional Impact of Disinfectants

Background. Computers are ubiquitous in the healthcare setting and have been shown to be contaminated with potentially pathogenic microorganisms. This study was performed to determine the degree of microbial contamination, the efficacy of different disinfectants, and the cosmetic and functional effects of the disinfectants on the computer keyboards. Methods. We assessed the effectiveness of 6 different disinfectants (1 each containing chlorine, alcohol, or phenol and 3 containing quaternary ammonium) against 3 test organisms (oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [ORSA], Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus species) inoculated onto study computer keyboards. We also assessed the computer keyboards for functional and cosmetic damage after disinfectant use. Results. Potential pathogens cultured from more than 50% of the computers included coagulase-negative staphylococci (100% of keyboards), diphtheroids (80%), Micrococcus species (72%), and Bacillus species (64%). Other pathogens cultured included ORSA (4% of keyboards), OSSA (4%), vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus species (12%), and nonfermentative gram-negative rods (36%). All disinfectants, as well as the sterile water control, were effective at removing or inactivating more than 95% of the test bacteria. No functional or cosmetic damage to the computer keyboards was observed after 300 disinfection cycles. Conclusions. Our data suggest that microbial contamination of keyboards is prevalent and that keyboards may be successfully decontaminated with disinfectants. Keyboards should be disinfected daily or when visibly soiled or if they become contaminated with blood.

[1]  Didier Pittet,et al.  Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings. Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HIPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. , 2002, American journal of infection control.

[2]  J. Parker,et al.  Computer keyboards and faucet handles as reservoirs of nosocomial pathogens in the intensive care unit. , 2000, American journal of infection control.

[3]  A. D. Russell,et al.  Principles and practice of disinfection, preservation and sterilization. Second edition. , 1992 .

[4]  G. Warden,et al.  Computer keyboards as reservoirs for Acinetobacter baumannii in a burn hospital. , 1999, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[5]  M. Chadwick,et al.  Bacterial contamination of ward-based computer terminals. , 2002, The Journal of hospital infection.

[6]  J. Burke,et al.  Infection control - a problem for patient safety. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Didier Pittet,et al.  Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC / SHEA / APIC / IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force , 2002 .

[8]  R. Cooke,et al.  Is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) contamination of ward-based computer terminals a surrogate marker for nosocomial MRSA transmission and handwashing compliance? , 2001, The Journal of hospital infection.

[9]  R. Röhrig,et al.  Computer Keyboard and Mouse as a Reservoir of Pathogens in an Intensive Care Unit , 2003, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[10]  F. Gordin,et al.  Bacterial Contamination of Computer Keyboards in a Teaching Hospital , 2003, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[11]  A. Neely,et al.  Dealing with contaminated computer keyboards and microbial survival. , 2001, American journal of infection control.