Information transmission with a multifinger tactual display

In this work, the tactual information transmission capabilities of a tactual display designed to provide stimulation along a continuum from kinesthetic movements to cutaneous vibrations are assessed. The display is capable of delivering arbitrary waveforms to three digits (thumb, index, and middle finger) within an amplitude range from absolute detection threshold to about 50 dB sensation level and a frequency range from dc to above 300 Hz. Stimulus sets were designed at each of three signal durations (125, 250, and 500 msec) by combining salient attributes, such as frequency (further divided into low, middle, and high regions), amplitude, direction of motion, and finger location. Estimated static information transfer (IT) was 6.5 bits at 500 mseC., 6.4 bits at 250 mseC., and 5.6 bits at 125 msec. Estimates of IT rate were derived from identification experiments in which the subject’s task was to identify the middle stimulus in a sequence of three stimuli randomly selected from a given stimulus set. On the basis of the extrapolations from these IT measurements to continuous streams, the IT rate was estimated to be about 12 bits/seC., which is roughly the same as that achieved by Tadoma users in tactual speech communication.

[1]  Lowe Bryan William,et al.  Studies on the telegraphic language: The acquisition of a hierarchy of habits. , 1899 .

[2]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  Prediction and Entropy of Printed English , 1951 .

[3]  I. Pollack,et al.  The Information of Elementary Multidimensional Auditory Displays , 1954 .

[4]  Ga Miller,et al.  Note on the bias of information estimates , 1955 .

[5]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[6]  F. A. Geldard.  Adventures in tactile literacy. , 1957 .

[7]  E. A. Alluisi,et al.  An information analysis of verbal and motor responses in a forced-paced serial task. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  James Charles Bliss,et al.  Communication via the kinesthetic and tactile senses , 1961 .

[9]  J. Pickett,et al.  COMMUNICATION OF SPEECH SOUNDS BY A TACTUAL VOCODER. , 1963, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[10]  G. Gescheider.  Resolving of successive clicks by the ears and skin. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  J. C. Bliss,et al.  A direct translation reading aid for the blind , 1966 .

[12]  George A. Gescheider,et al.  Auditory and cutaneous temporal resolution of successive brief stimuli. , 1967 .

[13]  Emerson Foulke,et al.  Transmission of Morse Code by Electrocutaneous Stimulation , 1968 .

[14]  W. R. Garner.  Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts , 1975 .

[15]  J C Craig,et al.  Vibrotactile pattern perception: extraordinary observers. , 1977, Science.

[16]  C M Reed,et al.  Analytic study of the Tadoma method: discrimination ability of untrained observers. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[17]  C M Reed,et al.  Analytic study of the Tadoma method: further experiments with inexperienced observers. , 1982, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[18]  Adrianus J. M. Houtsma.  Estimation of mutual information from limited experimental data , 1983 .

[19]  P J Blamey,et al.  A wearable multiple-electrode electrotactile speech processor for the profoundly deaf. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  C. Sherrick.  A scale for rate of tactual vibration. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  J. Craig.  Tactile pattern perception and its perturbations. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  C M Reed,et al.  Research on the Tadoma method of speech communication. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  P J Blamey,et al.  Psychophysical studies relevant to the design of a digital electrotactile speech processor. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  N I Durlach,et al.  Multidimensional tactile displays: identification of vibratory intensity, frequency, and contactor area. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  C M Reed,et al.  Preliminary results of speech-reception tests obtained with the synthetic Tadoma system. , 1988, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[26]  A M Liberman,et al.  A specialization for speech perception. , 1989, Science.

[27]  N I Durlach,et al.  Analysis of a synthetic Tadoma system as a multidimensional tactile display. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Charlotte M. Reed,et al.  Research on Tactual Communication of Speech: Ideas, Issues, and Findings. , 1989 .

[29]  William M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Continuing evaluation of a synthetic Tadoma system , 1990 .

[30]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective , 1990 .

[31]  P J Blamey,et al.  Perception of multiple electrode stimulus patterns: implications for design of an electrotactile speech processor. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Lorraine A. Delhorne,et al.  Current Results of a Field Study of Adult Users of Tactile Aids , 1995 .

[33]  J C Craig,et al.  Tactile selective attention and temporal masking , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  J C Craig,et al.  Vibrotactile masking: The role of response competition , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  C M Reed,et al.  Reception of Morse code through motional, vibrotactile, and auditory stimulation , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  B H Brown,et al.  Information from time-varying vibrotactile stimuli. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Nathaniel I. Durlach,et al.  Note on Information Transfer Rates in Human Communication , 1998, Presence.