Intracoronary stenting without anticoagulation accomplished with intravascular ultrasound guidance.

BACKGROUND The placement of stents in coronary arteries has been shown to reduce restenosis in comparison to balloon angioplasty. However, clinical use of intracoronary stents is impeded by the risk of subacute stent thrombosis and complications associated with the anticoagulant regimen. To reduce these complications, the hypothesis that systemic anticoagulation is not necessary when adequate stent expansion is achieved was prospectively evaluated on a consecutive series of patients who received intracoronary stents. METHODS AND RESULTS From March 1993 to January 1994, 359 patients underwent Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent insertion. After an initial successful angiographic result with < 20% stenosis by visual estimation had been achieved, intravascular ultrasound imaging was performed. Further balloon dilatation of the stent was guided by observation of the intravascular ultrasound images. All patients with adequate stent expansion confirmed by ultrasound were treated only with antiplatelet therapy (either ticlopidine for 1 month with short-term aspirin for 5 days or only aspirin) after the procedure. Clinical success (procedure success without early postprocedural events) at 2 months was achieved in 338 patients (94%). With an inflation pressure of 14.9 +/- 3.0 atm and a balloon-to-vessel ratio of 1.17 +/- 0.19, optimal stent expansion was achieved in 321 of the 334 patients (96%) who underwent intravascular ultrasound evaluation, with these patients receiving only antiplatelet therapy after the procedure. Despite the absence of anticoagulation, there were only two acute stent thromboses (0.6%) and one subacute stent thrombosis (0.3%) at 2-month clinical follow-up. Follow-up angiography at 3 to 6 months documented two additional occlusions (0.6%) at the stent site. At 6-month clinical follow-up, angiographically documented stent occlusion had occurred in 5 patients (1.6%). At 6-month clinical follow-up, there was a 5.7% incidence of myocardial infarction, a 6.4% rate of coronary bypass surgery, and a 1.9% incidence of death. Emergency intervention (emergency angioplasty or bailout stent) for a stent thrombosis event was performed in 3 patients (0.8%). The overall event rate was relatively high because of intraprocedural complications that occurred in 16 patients (4.5%). Intraprocedural complications, however, decreased to 1% when angiographically appropriately sized balloons were used for final stent dilations. There was one ischemic vascular complication that occurred at the time of the procedure and one ischemic vascular complication that occurred at the time of angiographic follow-up. By 6 months, repeat angioplasty for symptomatic restenosis was performed in 47 patients (13.1%). CONCLUSIONS The Palmaz-Schatz stent can be safely inserted in coronary arteries without subsequent anticoagulation provided that stent expansion is adequate and there are no other flow-limiting lesions present. The use of high-pressure final balloon dilatations and confirmation of adequate stent expansion by intravascular ultrasound provide assurance that anticoagulation therapy can be safely omitted. This technique significantly reduces hospital time and vascular complications and has a low stent thrombosis rate.

[1]  R A Schatz,et al.  Clinical experience with the Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  P. Teirstein,et al.  A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  P. Whitlow,et al.  Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of saphenous vein graft stenosis: long-term follow-up. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  J. Schofer,et al.  Impact of compensatory enlargement of atherosclerotic coronary arteries on angiographic assessment of coronary artery disease. , 1989, Circulation.

[5]  J. Tobis,et al.  Preliminary experience with intravascular ultrasound guided Palmaz-Schatz coronary stenting: the acute and short-term results on a consecutive series of patients. , 1994, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[6]  Larry S. Dean,et al.  Intracoronary Stenting for Acute and Threatened Closure Complicating Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty , 1992, Circulation.

[7]  I. N. Sinclair,et al.  Predictors, therapeutic options and long-term outcome of abrupt reclosure. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  P W Serruys,et al.  Incidence of restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty: a time-related phenomenon. A quantitative angiographic study in 342 consecutive patients at 1, 2, 3, and 4 months. , 1988, Circulation.

[9]  E. Topol,et al.  Multicenter investigation of coronary stenting to treat acute or threatened closure after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: clinical and angiographic outcomes. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  R. Califf,et al.  Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: an overview. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  B Meier,et al.  Angiographic follow-up after placement of a self-expanding coronary-artery stent. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  E L Bolson,et al.  A new digital electronic caliper for measurement of coronary arterial stenosis: comparison with visual estimates and computer-assisted measurements. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  E. Topol,et al.  Thrombosis of a flexible coil coronary stent: frequency, predictors and clinical outcome. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  T. Ryan Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  S. Goldberg,et al.  Benefit of intracoronary ultrasound in the deployment of Palmaz-Schatz stents. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  H. S. Mueller,et al.  The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Julio C. Palmaz,et al.  Clinical Experience With the Palmaz‐Schatz Coronary Stent: Initial Results of a Multicenter Study , 1991, Circulation.

[18]  Walter L. Henry,et al.  Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging of Human Coronary Arteries In Vivo: Analysis of Tissue Characterizations With Comparison to In Vitro Histological Specimens , 1991, Circulation.

[19]  W Rutsch,et al.  A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  S. Goldberg,et al.  Intracoronary ultrasound observations during stent implantation. , 1994, Circulation.

[21]  D. Faxon,et al.  Incidence and consequences of periprocedural occlusion. The 1985-1986 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry. , 1990, Circulation.

[22]  A J Tajik,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound imaging: in vitro validation and pathologic correlation. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  C. Simpfendorfer,et al.  Frequency, management and follow-up of patients with acute coronary occlusions after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  M. Nobuyoshi,et al.  Restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: serial angiographic follow-up of 229 patients. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  B F Waller,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound: a histological study of vessels during life. The new 'gold standard' for vascular imaging. , 1992, Circulation.

[26]  E. Topol,et al.  Factors influencing restenosis after coronary angioplasty. , 1990, The American journal of medicine.

[27]  Thomas J. Ryan,et al.  Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Committee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  C. Lambert,et al.  Videodensitometry versus digital calipers for quantitative coronary angiography. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[29]  P. Serruys,et al.  Relative Risk Analysis of Angiographic Predictors of Restenosis Within the Coronary Wallstent , 1991, Circulation.

[30]  M. Nobuyoshi,et al.  Serial angiographic follow-up after Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation: comparison with conventional balloon angioplasty. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  M. Leon,et al.  Emergent Use of Balloon‐Expandable Coronary Artery Stenting for Failed Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty , 1992, Circulation.

[32]  C M Gibson,et al.  Angiographic and clinical outcome of intracoronary stenting: immediate and long-term results from a large single-center experience. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[33]  C. Zarins,et al.  Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.