Econometric Estimation of Technical and Environmental Efficiency: An Application to Dutch Dairy Farms

In this article we estimate the technical and environmental efficiency of a panel of Dutch dairy farms. Nitrogen surplus, arising from the application of excessive amounts of manure and chemical fertilizer, is treated as an environmentally detrimental input. A stochastic translog production frontier is specified to estimate the output-oriented technical efficiency. Environmental efficiency is estimated as the input-oriented technical efficiency of a single input, the nitrogen surplus of each farm. The mean output-oriented technical efficiency is rather high, 0.894, but the mean input-oriented environmental efficiency is only 0.441. Intensive dairy farms are both technically and environmentally more efficient than extensive farms. Copyright 1999, Oxford University Press.

[1]  W. Meeusen,et al.  Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error , 1977 .

[2]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Measuring the technical efficiency of production , 1978 .

[3]  Lung-fei Lee,et al.  The measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in the Indonesian weaving industry , 1981 .

[4]  R. Kopp.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: A Reconsideration , 1981 .

[5]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  MULTILATERAL COMPARISONS OF OUTPUT, INPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY USING SUPERLATIVE INDEX NUMBERS* , 1982 .

[6]  Russell Pittman,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons with Undesirable Outputs , 1983 .

[7]  Thomas L. Cox,et al.  Prices and Quality Effects in Cross-Sectional Demand Analysis , 1986 .

[8]  J. Higgins,et al.  Input demand and output supply on Irish farms— A micro-economic approach , 1986 .

[9]  G. Battese,et al.  Prediction of firm-level technical efficiencies with a generalized frontier production function and panel data , 1988 .

[10]  C.A.K. Lovell,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach , 1989 .

[11]  M. Cropper,et al.  Environmental Economics: A Survey , 1992 .

[12]  G. Battese,et al.  Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: With application to paddy farmers in India , 1992 .

[13]  Kingsley E. Haynes,et al.  Environmental decision models: U.S. experience and a new approach to pollution management , 1993 .

[14]  R. Färe.  Derivation of Shadow Prices for Undesirable Outputs: A Distance Function Approach , 1993 .

[15]  Scott E. Atkinson,et al.  Estimation of Output and Input Technical Efficiency Using a Flexible Form and Panel Data , 1994 .

[16]  Kingsley E. Haynes,et al.  Toward a pollution abatement monitoring policy: Measurements, model mechanics, and data requirements , 1994 .

[17]  Suthathip Yaisawarng,et al.  The Effects of Sulfur Dioxide Controls on Productivity Change in the U.S. Electric Power Industry , 1994 .

[18]  T. Coelli.  RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN FRONTIER MODELLING AND EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT , 1995 .

[19]  Daniel Tyteca,et al.  On the Measurement of the Environmental Performance of Firms— A Literature Review and a Productive Efficiency Perspective , 1996 .

[20]  H. Leneman,et al.  The Nutrient Flow Model for Dutch Agriculture: A Tool for Environmental Policy Evaluation , 1996 .

[21]  D. Zoebl.  Controversies around resource use efficiency in agriculture: Shadow or substance? Theories of C. T. de Wit (1924–1993) , 1996 .

[22]  Lauri Hetemäki,et al.  ESSAYS ON THE IMPACT OF POLLUTION CONTROL ON A FIRM: A DISTANCE FUNCTION APPROACH , 1996 .

[23]  Daniel Tyteca,et al.  Linear Programming Models for the Measurement of Environmental Performance of Firms—Concepts and Empirical Results , 1997 .

[24]  R. Boggs,et al.  Hazardous waste treatment facilities : modeling production with pollution as both an input and an output , 1997 .

[25]  A. U.S.,et al.  FORMULATION AND ESTIMATION OF STOCHASTIC FRONTIER PRODUCTION FUNCTION MODELS , 2001 .