The GCM‐Oriented CALIPSO Cloud Product (CALIPSO‐GOCCP)

[1] This article presents the GCM-Oriented Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) Cloud Product (GOCCP) designed to evaluate the cloudiness simulated by general circulation models (GCMs). For this purpose, Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization L1 data are processed following the same steps as in a lidar simulator used to diagnose the model cloud cover that CALIPSO would observe from space if the satellite was flying above an atmosphere similar to that predicted by the GCM. Instantaneous profiles of the lidar scattering ratio (SR) are first computed at the highest horizontal resolution of the data but at the vertical resolution typical of current GCMs, and then cloud diagnostics are inferred from these profiles: vertical distribution of cloud fraction, horizontal distribution of low, middle, high, and total cloud fractions, instantaneous SR profiles, and SR histograms as a function of height. Results are presented for different seasons (January–March 2007–2008 and June–August 2006–2008), and their sensitivity to parameters of the lidar simulator is investigated. It is shown that the choice of the vertical resolution and of the SR threshold value used for cloud detection can modify the cloud fraction by up to 0.20, particularly in the shallow cumulus regions. The tropical marine low-level cloud fraction is larger during nighttime (by up to 0.15) than during daytime. The histograms of SR characterize the cloud types encountered in different regions. The GOCCP high-level cloud amount is similar to that from the TIROS Operational Vertical Sounder (TOVS) and the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS). The low-level and middle-level cloud fractions are larger than those derived from passive remote sensing (International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project, Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer–Cloud and Earth Radiant Energy System Polarization and Directionality of Earth Reflectances, TOVS Path B, AIRS–Laboratoire de Meteorologie Dynamique) because the latter only provide information on the uppermost cloud layer.

[1]  W. Rossow,et al.  Cloud Detection Using Satellite Measurements of Infrared and Visible Radiances for ISCCP , 1993 .

[2]  N. Lau,et al.  A Satellite View of the Synoptic-Scale Organization of Cloud Properties in Midlatitude and Tropical Circulation Systems , 1995 .

[3]  H. Treut,et al.  A methodology study of the validation of clouds in GCMs using ISCCP satellite observations , 1996 .

[4]  W. Rossow,et al.  Implementation of Subgrid Cloud Vertical Structure inside a GCM and Its Effect on the Radiation Budget , 1997 .

[5]  Claudia J. Stubenrauch,et al.  Clouds as Seen by Satellite Sounders (3I) and Imagers (ISCCP). Part III: Spatial Heterogeneity and Radiative Effects , 1999 .

[6]  W. Rossow,et al.  Advances in understanding clouds from ISCCP , 1999 .

[7]  A. Chédin,et al.  Clouds as Seen by Satellite Sounders (3I) and Imagers (ISCCP). Part II: A New Approach for Cloud Parameter Determination in the 3I Algorithms , 1999 .

[8]  S. Klein,et al.  Validation and Sensitivities of Frontal Clouds Simulated by the ECMWF Model , 1999 .

[9]  Richard H. Johnson,et al.  Trimodal Characteristics of Tropical Convection , 1999 .

[10]  A. Thompson,et al.  Tropical convective outflow and near surface equivalent potential temperatures , 2000 .

[11]  D. Jacob,et al.  Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology : Model description and evaluation , 2001 .

[12]  S. Bony,et al.  Combining ERBE and ISCCP data to assess clouds in the Hadley Centre, ECMWF and LMD atmospheric climate models , 2001 .

[13]  Bertrand Cadet,et al.  Comparison of POLDER apparent and corrected oxygen pressure to ARM/MMCR cloud boundary pressures , 2003 .

[14]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Daytime and nighttime polar cloud and snow identification using MODIS data , 2003, SPIE Asia-Pacific Remote Sensing.

[15]  Jerome Riedi,et al.  Review of capabilities of multi-angle and polarization cloud measurements from POLDER , 2004 .

[16]  J. Norris,et al.  North Pacific Cloud Feedbacks Inferred from Synoptic-Scale Dynamic and Thermodynamic Relationships , 2005 .

[17]  S. Bony,et al.  Marine boundary layer clouds at the heart of tropical cloud feedback uncertainties in climate models , 2005 .

[18]  S. Bony,et al.  Comparing clouds and their seasonal variations in 10 atmospheric general circulation models with satellite measurements , 2005 .

[19]  J. Spinhirne,et al.  Tropopause‐level thin cirrus coverage revealed by ICESat/Geoscience Laser Altimeter System , 2006 .

[20]  Donald P. Wylie,et al.  Diurnal Cycles of Clouds and How They Affect Polar-Orbiting Satellite Data , 2006 .

[21]  Claudia J. Stubenrauch,et al.  Cloud Properties and Their Seasonal and Diurnal Variability from TOVS Path-B , 2006 .

[22]  J. Spinhirne,et al.  Tropical cloud‐top height distributions revealed by the Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite (ICESat)/Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS) , 2006 .

[23]  D. Winker,et al.  Initial performance assessment of CALIOP , 2007 .

[24]  Gerald G. Mace,et al.  Cluster analysis of tropical clouds using CloudSat data , 2007 .

[25]  John M. Haynes,et al.  A Multipurpose Radar Simulation Package: QuickBeam , 2007 .

[26]  Evaluation of cloud systems in the Met Office global forecast model using CloudSat data , 2007 .

[27]  Sunny Sun-Mack,et al.  Cloud Detection in Nonpolar Regions for CERES Using TRMM VIRS and Terra and Aqua MODIS Data , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[28]  Claudia J. Stubenrauch,et al.  Cloud properties from Atmospheric Infrared Sounder and evaluation with Cloud‐Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations , 2008 .

[29]  S. Bony,et al.  Use of CALIPSO lidar observations to evaluate the cloudiness simulated by a climate model , 2008 .

[30]  Damian R. Wilson,et al.  Evaluating cloud systems in the Met Office global forecast model using simulated CloudSat radar reflectivities , 2008 .

[31]  Kenneth Sassen,et al.  Classifying clouds around the globe with the CloudSat radar: 1‐year of results , 2008 .

[32]  R. Marchand,et al.  A comparison of simulated cloud radar output from the multiscale modeling framework global climate model with CloudSat cloud radar observations , 2009 .

[33]  R. Marchand,et al.  A description of hydrometeor layer occurrence statistics derived from the first year of merged Cloudsat and CALIPSO data , 2009 .

[34]  D. Winker,et al.  Overview of the CALIPSO Mission and CALIOP Data Processing Algorithms , 2009 .