An analysis of the relationship between information and communication technology (ICT) and scientific literacy in Canada and Australia

Despite the lack of substantial evidence for improvement in the quality of teaching and learning with information and communication technology (ICT), governmental organizations have pushed ICT as a means of providing broad-scale training to meet the demand for a skilled workforce, centred upon a hypothesized ICT-scientific literacy relationship. To better understand this possible association, this study used data from the 2006 administration of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA 2006) to determine the extent to which scientific literacy is predicted by a host of ICT-related variables, after adjusting for student demographic characteristics. The findings suggest that, once demographic characteristics have been accounted for, students with prior experience with ICT, who browse the Internet more frequently, and who are confident with basic ICT tasks earned higher scientific literacy scores. Gender differences existed with respect to types of productivity and entertainment software used; this difference may be attributed to personal choice and initiative to learn ICT. Furthermore, the way in which students are using computers in schools, towards attaining learning outcomes, may have a stronger effect on scientific literacy than how often computers are accessed.

[1]  R. G. Baird.  Learning to Change: ICT in Schools , 2002, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[2]  Todd Milford,et al.  Multilevel Modeling with HLM: Taking a Second Look at PISA , 2009 .

[3]  Ronald H. Heck,et al.  An Introduction to Multilevel Modeling Techniques , 1999 .

[4]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Student Achievement and National Economic Growth , 2006, American Journal of Education.

[5]  Paul C. Gorski.  Education Equity and the Digital Divide , 2005 .

[6]  Douglas A. Levin,et al.  The Digital Disconnect: The Widening Gap Between Internet-Savvy Students and Their Schools , 2002 .

[7]  Sue Thomson,et al.  PISA 2003 Australia: ICT use and familiarity at school and home , 2007 .

[8]  Sajda Qureshi Editor-in-Chief.  Assessment of the social factors in information and communication technology access and use , 2009 .

[9]  Brian O’Sullivan,et al.  Global Change and Educational Reform in Ontario and Canada. , 1999 .

[10]  Xin Ma,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Modelling of Student and School Effects on Academic Achievement , 2000 .

[11]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .

[12]  H. Becker.  Who's wired and who's not: children's access to and use of computer technology. , 2000, The Future of children.

[13]  Margaret Wu.  The Role of Plausible Values in Large-Scale Surveys. , 2005 .

[14]  Richard Gunstone,et al.  Science Curriculum in the Market Liberal Society of the Twenty-first Century: ‘Re-visioning’ the Idea of Science for All , 2009 .

[15]  Mirjam Moerbeek,et al.  Introduction - Multilevel Analysis , 1996 .

[16]  Del Siegle,et al.  Laptop Computers and Multimedia and Presentation Software: Their Effects on Student Achievement in Anatomy and Physiology , 2001 .

[17]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Technology and science education: Starting points, research programs, and trends , 2003 .

[18]  Yuk Fai Cheong,et al.  HLM 6: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling , 2000 .

[19]  Ludger Woessmann,et al.  Computers and Student Learning: Bivariate and Multivariate Evidence on the Availability and Use of Computers at Home and at School , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[20]  Els Kuiper,et al.  New technologies, new differences. Gender and ethnic differences in pupils' use of ICT in primary and secondary education , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[21]  David Mappin.  Canada's SchoolNet initiative , 1995 .

[22]  Michael C. Pyryt,et al.  Predictors of Achievement in Basic Skills: A Canadian Effective Schools Study , 1998 .

[23]  S. Hennessy,et al.  Literature Review in Science Education and the Role of ICT: Promise, Problems and Future Directions , 2003 .

[24]  Harold F. O'Neil,et al.  Meta-analytic studies of findings on computer-based instruction. , 1994 .

[25]  Jörg Wittwer,et al.  Is students' computer use at home related to their mathematical performance at school? , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Karyn M. Plumm.  Technology in the classroom: Burning the bridges to the gaps in gender-biased education? , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[27]  Willem J. Pelgrum,et al.  Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: results from a worldwide educational assessment , 2001, Comput. Educ..

[28]  Laura Naves Arnaldos.  Are Students Ready for a Technology-Rich World? , 2008 .

[29]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Learning With Computer-Based Learning Environments: A Literature Review of Computer Self-Efficacy , 2009 .

[30]  Peter David,et al.  Education in Canada , 1984, Nature.

[31]  A M Russell,et al.  Science and technology. , 1972, Science.

[32]  Willem J. Pelgrum,et al.  The IEA study of computers in education: implementation of an innovation in 21 education systems , 1993 .

[33]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Using Large-scale Assessment Datasets for Research in Science and Mathematics Education: Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) , 2007 .

[34]  A. McFarlane,et al.  The Role of ICT in Science Education , 2002 .

[35]  Charalambos Vrasidas,et al.  An examination of the PISA database to explore the relationship between computer use and science achievement , 2005 .

[36]  David Reynolds,et al.  ICT - the hopes and the reality , 2003, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[37]  Sue Thomson,et al.  Exploring Scientific Literacy: How Australia measures up. The PISA 2006 survey of students' scientific, reading and mathematical literacy skills , 2008 .

[38]  Russell Tytler,et al.  Re-imagining Science Education Engaging students in science for Australia ’ s future , 2007 .

[39]  Shenyang Guo.  Analyzing grouped data with hierarchical linear modeling , 2005 .

[40]  Rob Phillips,et al.  Evaluating the use of learning objects in Australian and New Zealand schools , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[41]  Edward Seidman,et al.  The development of ethnic identity during adolescence. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[42]  F. Biocca,et al.  Does home internet use influence the academic performance of low-income children? , 2006 .

[43]  Tjeerd Plomp,et al.  Indicators of ICT in Mathematics: Status and Covariation with Achievement Measures , 2001 .

[44]  Yaobin Lu,et al.  Internet inequality: The relationship between high school students' Internet use in different locations and their Internet self-efficacy , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[45]  P. Attewell.  The First and Second Digital Divides , 2001 .

[46]  Rodger W. Bybee,et al.  Preparing the 21st century workforce: A new reform in science and technology education , 2006 .

[47]  G. Glass,et al.  Statistical methods in education and psychology, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[48]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[49]  David P. Baker,et al.  National Differences, Global Similarities: World Culture and the Future of Schooling , 2005 .

[50]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[51]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. , 1999 .

[52]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[53]  Valerie E. Lee,et al.  Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling to Study Social Contexts: The Case of School Effects , 2000 .

[54]  Robin Kay,et al.  Exploring Gender Differences in Computer-Related Behaviour: Past, Present, and Future , 2008 .

[55]  Dara Searle,et al.  Students in a Digital Age: Implications of ICT for Teaching and Learning , 2008 .

[56]  John Cresswell,et al.  Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy : a framework for PISA 2006 , 2006 .

[57]  Liisa Ilomäki,et al.  Intensive use of ICT in school: Developing differences in students' ICT expertise , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[58]  Elizabeth Cannon,et al.  Computers and Career Choices: Gender Differences in Grades 7 and 10 Students , 2002 .

[59]  Janice D. Gobert,et al.  Leveraging Technology and Cognitive Tehory on Visualization to Promote Students’ Science , 2005 .

[60]  Gayle S. Christensen,et al.  Where immigrant students succeed: A comparative review of performance and engagement in PISA 2003 , 2006 .

[61]  Mike Sosteric,et al.  Influence of Socioeconomic Status and Gender on High School Seniors' Use of Computers at Home and at School , 2003 .

[62]  Tamar Levine,et al.  A computer-based program can make a difference: The case of the rediscover science program , 1994 .

[63]  Marilyn Binkley,et al.  Methodological Issues in Comparative Educational Studies: The Case of the IEA Reading Literacy Study. , 1995 .

[64]  Suzanne Willis,et al.  Beyond the ‘digital divide’ , 2006 .

[65]  Samuel T. Mayo,et al.  Statistical methods in education and psychology , 1979 .

[66]  Steven J. Chrostowski,et al.  TIMSS 2003 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA's Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades. , 2004 .