Attention to adjacent and separate positions in space: An electrophysiological analysis

Some theories of visuospatial attention propose that attention can be divided between separated zones of space that exclude the intervening region, whereas other theories state that the focus of attention must encompass aunitary, continuous zone. These contrasting viewswere evaluated in an experiment 9n which subjects were required to monitor two of four stimulus locations for targets; the two relevant locations were adjacent in one condition and were separated by an intervening irrelevant location in a second condition . To assess the distribution of attention across the relevant and irrelevant locations, event-related brain potentials(ERPa)were recorded to taskirrelevant “probe” stimuli that were occasionally presented at the individual stimulus locations. When the relevant locations were adjacent, probes presented at irrelevant locations elicited smaller sensory-evoked electrophysiological responses than probes presented at relevant locations, consistent with an attentional suppression of inputs from the unattended locations. When the relevant locations were separated by an irrelevant location, however, the sensory responses evoked by probes presented at this intervening irrelevant location were not suppressed, and target detection performance became slower and less accurate. These results suggest that attentionforms a unitary zone that may expand to encompass multiple relevant locations but must also include the area between them; as a result, irrelevant information arising from intervening locations is not suppressed and perceptual processing is compromised.

[1]  F. Perrin,et al.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  U. Castiello,et al.  Splitting focal attention. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[4]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Attentional distribution in the visual field duringsame-different judgments as assessed by response competition , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  I. Silver,et al.  ATP and Brain Function , 1989, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[6]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  J. Beck,et al.  The effects of concentrated and distributed attention on peripheral acuity , 1973 .

[8]  S J Luck,et al.  Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. II. Functional dissociation of P1 and N1 components. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  R. Shepard,et al.  Distribution of visual attention over space. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  S J Luck,et al.  Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. I. Evidence for early selection. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  O Bertrand,et al.  Scalp current density fields: concept and properties. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. , 1989 .

[14]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Shifting of attentional focus within and about a visual display , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  R. Näätänen Attention and brain function , 1992 .

[16]  S. Luck,et al.  The role of attention in feature detection and conjunction discrimination: an electrophysiological analysis. , 1995, The International journal of neuroscience.

[17]  G. Shulman,et al.  Gradients of spatial attention. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[18]  H. Hughes,et al.  Natural boundaries for the spatial spread of directed visual attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Allocation of visual attention to spatial locations: Tradeoff functions for event-related brain potentials and detection performance , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  M. Shaw,et al.  Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  M. R. Harter,et al.  Hemispheric differences in the neural processing of stimulus location and type: Effects of selective attention on visual evoked potentials , 1982, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  H. Hawkins,et al.  Visual attention modulates signal detectability. , 1990 .

[23]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an event-related potential and behavioral study. I. Normal hearing adults , 1987, Brain Research.

[24]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  Localization and temporal activity functions of brain sources generating the human visual ERP , 1990 .

[25]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal changes in the distribution of attention in the visual field in response to precues , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  R. Eason Visual evoked potential correlates of early neural filtering during selective attention , 1981 .

[27]  Y. Tsal Movements of attention across the visual field , 1983 .

[28]  S. Luck,et al.  Electrocortical substrates of visual selective attention , 1993 .

[29]  Bela Julesz,et al.  Enhanced detection in the aperture of focal attention during simple discrimination tasks , 1986, Nature.

[30]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  J. Hoffman,et al.  Spatial selectivity in visual search , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  U. Castiello,et al.  Size of the attentional focus and efficiency of processing. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[34]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  Marilyn L. Shaw,et al.  A capacity allocation model for reaction time. , 1978 .

[36]  B. Julesz,et al.  Fast noninertial shifts of attention. , 1985, Spatial vision.

[37]  D. LaBerge Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  S A Hillyard,et al.  Spatial gradients of visual attention: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[39]  G. Shulman,et al.  Spatial determinants of the distribution of attention , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  D. Homa,et al.  Sensitization of the visual field. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention to color and location: An analysis with event-related brain potentials , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  A. H. C. van der Heijden,et al.  Selective Attention in Vision , 1991 .

[43]  S. A. Hillyard,et al.  The Spatial Allocation of Visual Attention as Indexed by Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1987, Human factors.

[44]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: Psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection. , 1994 .

[45]  G. Shulman,et al.  Moving attention through visual space. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.