A Quick Guide for Computer-Assisted Instruction in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics

Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (CBB) are indispensable components in the training of life scientists [1]–[3]. Current curricula in the life sciences should prepare graduates who master quantitative and computer skills for increased levels of performance [4]–[6]. Equally important is that the application of the curricula is driven by an appropriate instructional paradigm and effective learning experiences. Teaching and learning with computers bring specific issues that should be considered beforehand by any instructor. The following Quick Guide for Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) outlines ten principles for effective teaching. The principles are aligned with current developments on human cognition and learning [7] and have been drawn from our own experience using CAI in seminars, tutorials, and distance education, in courses on Molecular Life Sciences at the undergraduate level, taught to majors in biology or in other subjects (e.g., nutrition, teaching of physics and chemistry, teaching of biology, sports). The Guide refers to the preparation, presentation, and assessment of CAI. It should be an aid for those who teach CBB with CAI in class, and it is expected to stimulate student motivation and deeper learning in CBB, thus making class time more effective and improving satisfaction of both students and instructors.

[1]  A Malcolm Campbell,et al.  Public access for teaching genomics, proteomics, and bioinformatics. , 2003, Cell biology education.

[2]  Pavel A. Pevzner,et al.  Educating biologists in the 21st century: bioinformatics scientists versus bioinformatics technicians , 2004, Bioinform..

[3]  Trevor R Anderson,et al.  The importance of visual literacy in the education of biochemists * , 2006, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[4]  Diane Ebert-May,et al.  Scientific Teaching , 2004, Science.

[5]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research , 2004 .

[6]  Patricia Ann Mabrouk,et al.  Active learning : models from the analytical sciences , 2007 .

[7]  A. O. Lima,et al.  Intrageneric primer design: Bringing bioinformatics tools to the class , 2006, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[8]  Oscar Garcia,et al.  Crossing the interdisciplinary barrier: a baccalaureate computer science option in bioinformatics , 2003, IEEE Trans. Educ..

[9]  P. Suppes,et al.  Computer-Assisted Instruction: Possibilities and Problems , 1985 .

[10]  Robert C. Clark,et al.  Technology Infusion and Higher Education: Changing Teaching and Learning , 1999 .

[11]  Bayardo Baptista Torres,et al.  Different energy sources in sports: Introductory software , 2003 .

[12]  S F Hulse Objectively speaking. , 1988, Radiologic technology.

[13]  Division on Earth BIO2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists , 2003 .

[14]  Urban Nuldén,et al.  E-ducation: Research and Practice , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[15]  C. Hansel Scientific Teaching , 1972, Nature.

[16]  J. Palha,et al.  Hormone-Mediated Gene Regulation and Bioinformatics: Learning One from the Other , 2007, PloS one.

[17]  Jerry E Honts,et al.  Evolving strategies for the incorporation of bioinformatics within the undergraduate cell biology curriculum. , 2003, Cell biology education.

[18]  Oxygen consumption by isolated mitochondria: Software for planning and interpreting experiments , 1998 .

[19]  Deborah Allen,et al.  The power of problem-based learning : a practical "how to" for teaching undergraduate courses in any discipline , 2001 .

[20]  Catherine J. Hack,et al.  Bioinformatics: Current practice and future challenges for life science education , 2005, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[21]  Susanne M Bockholt,et al.  Cancer cell biology: a student-centered instructional module exploring the use of multimedia to enrich interactive, constructivist learning of science. , 2003, Cell biology education.

[22]  Thomas Andre,et al.  The Effect of a Prior Dissection Simulation on Middle School Students' Dissection Performance and Understanding of the Anatomy and Morphology of the Frog , 1999 .

[23]  Nancy Warter-Perez,et al.  A summer program designed to educate college students for careers in bioinformatics. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[24]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[25]  R. Hake Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[26]  W. Bialek,et al.  Introductory Science and Mathematics Education for 21st-Century Biologists , 2004, Science.

[27]  Vincent N. Lunetta,et al.  The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century , 2004 .

[28]  R. Mayer,et al.  Animation as an Aid to Multimedia Learning , 2002 .