Dynamic decision making in lane change: Game theory with receding horizon

Decision making for lane change manoeuvre is of practical importance to guarantee a smooth, efficient and safe operation for autonomous driving. It is, however, challenging. On one hand, the behaviours of ego vehicle and adjacent vehicles are dependent and interactive. On the other hand, the decision should strictly guarantee safety during the whole process of lane change with uncertain and incomplete information in a dynamic and cluttered environment. To this end, the concept of Receding Horizon Control (RHC) is integrated into game theory in conjunction with reachability analysis tool, resulting in RHC based game theory. Specifically, the decision of each game relies on not only uncertain information at current step but also the future information calculated by reachability analysis. The decision is repeatedly made with the advent of new information using the concept of RHC. As a result, safety can be guaranteed during the whole process of lane change in a dynamic environment. Case study is conducted to demonstrate the advantages of the proposed approach. It is shown that the proposed RHC based game theory approach incorporating uncertain information can provide a safer and real-time decision.

[1]  Rune Elvik,et al.  A review of game-theoretic models of road user behaviour. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Sven Strauss Advances In Model Based Predictive Control , 2016 .

[3]  J. Nash,et al.  NON-COOPERATIVE GAMES , 1951, Classics in Game Theory.

[4]  Matthias Althoff,et al.  Reachability analysis of linear systems with uncertain parameters and inputs , 2007, 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[5]  Wen-Hua Chen,et al.  Receding horizon control for aircraft arrival sequencing and scheduling , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[6]  A. K. Raina,et al.  Collision avoidance among AGVs at junctions , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium 2000 (Cat. No.00TH8511).

[7]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  General Lane-Changing Model MOBIL for Car-Following Models , 2007 .

[8]  José Eugenio Naranjo,et al.  Lane-Change Fuzzy Control in Autonomous Vehicles for the Overtaking Maneuver , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[9]  Jinya Su,et al.  Fault diagnosis for vehicle lateral dynamics with robust threshold , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT).

[10]  K. Ahmed Modeling drivers' acceleration and lane changing behavior , 1999 .

[11]  P. G. Gipps,et al.  A MODEL FOR THE STRUCTURE OF LANE-CHANGING DECISIONS , 1986 .

[12]  Qingfeng Huang,et al.  An adaptive peer-to-peer collision warning system , 2002, Vehicular Technology Conference. IEEE 55th Vehicular Technology Conference. VTC Spring 2002 (Cat. No.02CH37367).

[13]  Hideyuki Kita,et al.  A merging–giveway interaction model of cars in a merging section: a game theoretic analysis , 1999 .

[14]  R. Rosenthal A class of games possessing pure-strategy Nash equilibria , 1973 .

[15]  Soo Jeon,et al.  Model predictive path planning with time-varying safety constraints for highway autonomous driving , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR).

[16]  S. Kolski,et al.  Detection, prediction, and avoidance of dynamic obstacles in urban environments , 2008, 2008 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[17]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  Modeling Lane-Changing Behavior in a Connected Environment: A Game Theory Approach , 2015 .

[18]  Ariel Rubinstein,et al.  A Course in Game Theory , 1995 .