Disconnected Surface Water and Groundwater: From Theory to Practice

When describing the hydraulic relationship between rivers and aquifers, the term disconnected is frequently misunderstood or used in an incorrect way. The problem is compounded by the fact that there is no definitive literature on the topic of disconnected surface water and groundwater. We aim at closing this gap and begin the discussion with a short introduction to the historical background of the terminology. Even though a conceptual illustration of a disconnected system was published by Meinzer (1923), it is only within the last few years that the underlying physics of the disconnection process has been described. The importance of disconnected systems, however, is not widely appreciated. Although rarely explicitly stated, many approaches for predicting the impacts of groundwater development on surface water resources assume full connection. Furthermore, management policies often suggest that surface water and groundwater should only be managed jointly if they are connected. However, although lowering the water table beneath a disconnected section of a river will not change the infiltration rate at that point, it can increase the length of stream that is disconnected. Because knowing the state of connection is of fundamental importance for sustainable water management, robust field methods that allow the identification of the state of connection are required. Currently, disconnection is identified by showing that the infiltration rate from a stream to an underlying aquifer is independent of the water table position or by identifying an unsaturated zone under the stream. More field studies are required to develop better methods for the identification of disconnection and to quantify the implications of heterogeneity and clogging processes in the streambed on disconnection.

[1]  Effects of stream‐aquifer disconnection on local flow patterns , 2008 .

[2]  A. Springer,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Variability of Hydraulic Conductivity in Active Reattachment Bars of the Colorado River, Grand Canyon , 1999 .

[3]  Antonis D. Koussis,et al.  Evaluation of simplified stream-aquifer depletion models for water rights administration , 1995 .

[4]  K. Ivkovic,et al.  A top–down approach to characterise aquifer–river interaction processes , 2009 .

[5]  G. Fox,et al.  Unsaturated hyporheic zone flow in stream/aquifer conjunctive systems , 2003 .

[6]  J. Sharp,et al.  On the relationship between river-basin geomorphology, aquifer hydraulics, and ground-water flow direction in alluvial aquifers , 1992 .

[7]  E. Wohl.  Disconnected rivers : linking rivers to landscapes , 2004 .

[8]  H. Franssen,et al.  Field evidence of a dynamic leakage coefficient for modelling river–aquifer interactions , 2007 .

[9]  J. Carrera,et al.  Estimation of Recharge from Floods in Disconnected Stream‐Aquifer Systems , 2007, Ground water.

[10]  C. Ruehl,et al.  Spatial and temporal variations in streambed hydraulic conductivity quantified with time-series thermal methods , 2010 .

[11]  A. W. Harbaugh.  MODFLOW-2005 : the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model--the ground-water flow process , 2005 .

[12]  E. Kwicklis,et al.  Temperature-Profile Methods for Estimating Percolation Rates in Arid Environments , 2003 .

[13]  Mark Cable Rains,et al.  Hydrological Connectivity Between Headwater Streams and Downstream Waters: How Science Can Inform Policy 1 , 2007 .

[14]  D. Zasłavsky.  THEORY OF UNSATURATED FLOW INTO A NON‐UNIFORM SOIL PROFILE , 1964 .

[15]  Henk M. Haitjema,et al.  Analytic Element Modeling of Groundwater Flow , 1995 .

[16]  B. J. Levy,et al.  Appendix E , 2000, Uumajursiutik unaatuinnamut / Hunter with Harpoon / Chasseur au harpon.

[17]  O. E. Meinzer.  Outline of ground-water hydrology, with definitions , 1923 .

[18]  F. Reinstorf,et al.  Measuring methods for groundwater – surface water interactions: a review , 2006 .

[19]  Hakan Başaǧaoǧlu,et al.  Joint Management of Surface and Ground Water Supplies , 1999 .

[20]  A. Packman,et al.  Interplay of stream‐subsurface exchange, clay particle deposition, and streambed evolution , 2003 .

[21]  Daniel B. Stephens,et al.  Vadose Zone Hydrology , 1995 .

[22]  The clogging of coarse gravel river beds by fine sediment , 1992 .

[23]  R. Therrien,et al.  Modeling Surface Water‐Groundwater Interaction with MODFLOW: Some Considerations , 2010, Ground water.

[24]  M. S. Hantush,et al.  Wells near streams with semipervious beds , 1965 .

[25]  C. Simmons,et al.  Hydrogeologic controls on disconnection between surface water and groundwater , 2009 .

[26]  T. Battin,et al.  Linking Sediment Biofilms, Hydrodynamics, and River Bed Clogging: Evidence from a Large River , 1999, Microbial Ecology.

[27]  Arlen W. Harbaugh,et al.  A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model , 1984 .

[28]  C. V. Theis.  The effect of a well on the flow of a nearby stream , 1941 .

[29]  A. Reisenauer.  Methods for solving problems of multidimensional, partially saturated steady flow in soils , 1963 .

[30]  Marios Sophocleous,et al.  Experimental studies in stream-aquifer interaction along the Arkansas river in central Kansas-field testing and analysis , 1988 .

[31]  R. Evans,et al.  Surface-groundwater connectivity assessment , 2008 .

[32]  Helena Mitasova,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability of streambed hydraulic conductivity in West Bear Creek, North Carolina, USA , 2008 .

[33]  Tim Covino,et al.  Stream gains and losses across a mountain‐to‐valley transition: Impacts on watershed hydrology and stream water chemistry , 2007 .

[34]  Thomas P. Minka,et al.  Gates , 2008, NIPS.

[35]  M. Sophocleous.  Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science , 2002 .

[36]  R. Braaten,et al.  Groundwater-surface water interaction in inland New South Wales: a scoping study. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[37]  P. H. Rahn.  The Hydrogeology of an Induced Streambed Infiltration Area , 1968 .

[38]  T. C. Winter,et al.  Ground Water and Surface Water: A Single Resource , 1999 .

[39]  Reed M. Maxwell,et al.  Patterns and dynamics of river–aquifer exchange with variably-saturated flow using a fully-coupled model , 2009 .

[40]  C. T. Jenkins,et al.  An evaluation of the effect of groundwater pumpage on the infiltration rate of a semipervious streambed , 1966 .

[41]  Thomas C. Winter,et al.  Ground water and surface water a single resource: U , 1998 .

[42]  T. Meixner,et al.  Clogging of an Effluent Dominated Semiarid River: A Conceptual Model of Stream‐Aquifer Interactions 1 , 2009 .

[43]  Michael Bruen,et al.  Modelling stream -aquifer seepage in an alluvial aquifer: an improved loosing-stream package for MODFLOW , 2002 .

[44]  Craig T. Simmons,et al.  Spatial and temporal aspects of the transition from connection to disconnection between rivers, lakes and groundwater , 2009 .

[45]  Thomas Nyholm,et al.  Flow depletion in a small stream caused by ground water abstraction from wells. , 2002, Ground water.

[46]  A. Calver.  Riverbed Permeabilities: Information from Pooled Data , 2001, Ground water.

[47]  D. Gutknecht,et al.  Clogging Processes in Hyporheic Interstices of an Impounded River, the Danube at Vienna, Austria , 2003 .