Real-time prediction of secondary incident occurrences using vehicle probe data

Effective incident management system requires quantifying non-recurring congestion and detecting a secondary incident under the negative influence of a primary incident. Previously suggested thresholds and measurement parameters provide no universal definition of a secondary incident, regardless of discussions on the topic. To solve this dilemma, we propose a Bayesian structure equation model to recognize congestion patterns for road segments using INRIX Data. An adjustment of the boxplot is applied to capture segments at the tail of the queue and at the head of the queue where secondary incidents might occur. The resulting contour plot provides temporal–spatial area under congestion to identify secondary incidents. The likelihood of classified secondary incidents are sequentially predicted from the point of incident response to the road clearance. The prediction performance of the principled Bayesian learning approach to neural networks outperforms the logistic model. The quality of predictions improve as new information (e.g. notification-arrival of response units, speed) becomes available. A pedagogical rule extraction approach will improve the ability to understand secondary incidents by extracting comprehensible rules from the neural networks. The symbolic description represents a series of decisions to assist emergency operators in their decision-making capabilities.

[1]  Hyoshin Park,et al.  Interpretation of Bayesian neural networks for predicting the duration of detected incidents , 2016, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[2]  Yafeng Yin,et al.  Freeway Service Patrol Deployment Planning for Incident Management and Congestion Mitigation , 2011 .

[3]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Criticism of three-phase traffic theory , 2009 .

[4]  Su Yang,et al.  On feature selection for traffic congestion prediction , 2013 .

[5]  Carlos Sun,et al.  Dynamic Incident Progression Curve for Classifying Secondary Traffic Crashes , 2010 .

[6]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[7]  Eleni I. Vlahogianni,et al.  Freeway Operations, Spatiotemporal-Incident Characteristics, and Secondary-Crash Occurrence , 2010 .

[8]  Albert Gan,et al.  Understanding the Characteristics of Secondary Crashes on Freeways , 2008 .

[9]  Mia Hubert,et al.  An adjusted boxplot for skewed distributions , 2008, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[10]  Jude W. Shavlik,et al.  in Advances in Neural Information Processing , 1996 .

[11]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  A Simple Time Sequential Procedure for Predicting Freeway Incident duration , 1995, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[12]  Michael L Pack Wide-area Congestion Performance Monitoring Using Probe Data , 2013 .

[13]  S. Washington,et al.  Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis , 2010 .

[14]  Genevieve Giuliano,et al.  SECONDARY ACCIDENT RATES ON LOS ANGELES FREEWAYS , 2004 .

[15]  Guohui Zhang,et al.  Gaussian Mixture Model-Based Speed Estimation and Vehicle Classification Using Single-Loop Measurements , 2012, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[16]  April Armstrong,et al.  Traffic Incident Management Handbook , 2010 .

[17]  MATTHEW G. KARLAFTIS,et al.  ITS Impacts on Safety and Traffic Management: An Investigation of Secondary Crash Causes , 1999, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[18]  Radford M. Neal MCMC Using Hamiltonian Dynamics , 2011, 1206.1901.

[19]  Liping Fu,et al.  Real-Time Estimation of Incident Delay in Dynamic and Stochastic Networks , 1997 .

[20]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  Incident management integration tool: dynamically predicting incident durations, secondary incident occurrence and incident delays , 2012 .

[21]  Mark S. Daskin,et al.  Multiple Vehicle Routing and Dispatching to an Emergency Scene , 1984 .

[22]  Ying Lee,et al.  Sequential forecast of incident duration using Artificial Neural Network models. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Alexander Skabardonis,et al.  Systematic Identification of Freeway Bottlenecks , 2004 .

[24]  Hyoshin Park,et al.  Stochastic Emergency Response Units (ERUs) Allocation Considering Secondary Incident Occurrences , 2015, ArXiv.

[25]  Eleni I. Vlahogianni,et al.  Methods for Defining Spatiotemporal Influence Areas and Secondary Incident Detection in Freeways , 2014 .

[26]  Haris N. Koutsopoulos,et al.  Dynamic data-driven local traffic state estimation and prediction , 2013 .

[27]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  Modeling the time to the next primary and secondary incident: A semi-Markov stochastic process approach , 2013 .

[28]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  Applying the Waek Learning Framework to Understand and Improve C4.5 , 1996, ICML.

[29]  Philip J Tarnoff,et al.  Data Collection of Freeway Travel Time Ground Truth with Bluetooth Sensors , 2010 .

[30]  Frederick Mosteller,et al.  Understanding robust and exploratory data analysis , 1983 .

[31]  John W. Tukey,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis. , 1979 .

[32]  Shaw-Pin Miaou,et al.  Pitfalls of Using R2 to Evaluate Goodness of Fit of Accident Prediction Models , 1996 .

[33]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  An exploratory hazard-based analysis of highway incident duration , 2000 .

[34]  Eleni I. Vlahogianni,et al.  Modeling the Effects of Weather and Traffic on the Risk of Secondary Incidents , 2012, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[35]  Robert L. Bertini,et al.  Comparison of Algorithms for Systematic Tracking of Patterns of Traffic Congestion on Freeways in Portland, Oregon , 2010 .

[36]  Richard A. Raub Occurrence of Secondary Crashes on Urban Arterial Roadways , 1997 .

[37]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Text analysis in incident duration prediction , 2013 .

[38]  Eleni I. Vlahogianni,et al.  Statistical methods versus neural networks in transportation research: Differences, similarities and some insights , 2011 .

[39]  Hubert Rehborn,et al.  Recognition and tracking of spatial–temporal congested traffic patterns on freeways , 2004 .