A new approach in system and tactic design optimization of an autonomous underwater vehicle by using Multidisciplinary Design Optimization

Abstract Optimal design of an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) consists of various subsystems and disciplines such as guidance and control, payload, hydrodynamics, power and propulsion, sizing, structure, trajectory and performance. The designed vehicle is also employed in an operational environment with tactical parameters such as distance to target, uncertainty in estimation of target position and target velocity. Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) is the best way for finding both optimum and feasible designs. In this paper, a new optimization design framework is proposed in which Multidisciplinary Feasible (MDF) as MDO framework and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) as optimizer were combined together for optimal and feasible conceptual design of an AUV. Initially, we found an optimal system design by using MDF-PSO methodology in engineering space for any single tactical situation (locally tactical parameters). Then the optimal off-design AUVs in tactical subspaces were found by minimizing the difference between the locally optimized objective function and sub-optimal objective function. In this framework, we have shown that not only is the tactical situation affected by AUV design parameters, but an optimal AUV for each tactical regions are also found.

[1]  Wenjing Lyu,et al.  An application of multidisciplinary design optimization to the hydrodynamic performances of underwater robots , 2015 .

[2]  Andrew P. Frits,et al.  Formulation of an Integrated Robust Design and Tactics Optimization Process for Undersea Weapon Systems , 2005 .

[3]  E. A. de Barros,et al.  Investigation of a method for predicting AUV derivatives , 2008 .

[4]  Martin Spieck,et al.  MDO: assessment and direction for advancement—an opinion of one international group , 2009 .

[5]  Todd W. Benanzer,et al.  System Level Optimization of Undersea Vehicles Subject to Mission Performance , 2008 .

[6]  Singiresu S. Rao Engineering Optimization : Theory and Practice , 2010 .

[7]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN OPTIMIZATION TESTBED BASED ON AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLE DESIGN , 2002 .

[8]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  REQUIREMENTS ON MDO IMPOSED BY THE UNDERSEA VEHICLE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PROBLEM , 2000 .

[9]  A.M. Pascoal,et al.  Investigation of Normal Force and Moment Coefficients for an AUV at Nonlinear Angle of Attack and Sideslip Range , 2008, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[10]  Robert J. Urick,et al.  Principles of underwater sound , 1975 .

[11]  James Kennedy,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 2002, Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks.

[12]  Henry V. Borst,et al.  Fluid-Dynamic Lift: Practical Information on Aerodynamic and Hydrodynamic Lift , 1992 .

[13]  D. Paster Importance of Hydrodynamic Considerations for Underwater Vehicle Design , 1986, OCEANS '86.

[14]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  ATTRIBUTE-BASED MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION OF UNDERSEA VEHICLES , 2000 .

[15]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  A Conceptual Design Environment for Technology Selection and Performance Optimization for Torpedoes , 2002 .

[16]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Multidisciplinary design optimization: A survey of architectures , 2013 .

[17]  Yin Wen-jin,et al.  Torpedo Guidance System Multidisciplinary Design Based on IDF , 2013, 2013 5th International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics.