Differences in end-user computing support and control across user departments

Abstract Although the diversity of end-users is well recognized in the end-user computing (EUC) management literature, a potentially important context factor remains little addressed: user department variables. The objective of this exploratory study was to identify variables at the department level that may be important for explaining differences in usage of support sources and awareness of control policies at the individual level. Semi-structured interviews were held with user managers in three functional departments and information systems (IS) managers within the same organization. The interview data were then used to customize questionnaires for end-users on the usage of EUC support sources and awareness of EUC control policies in the same three departments. Significant differences were found across the departments. The interview data suggest that, while the business activities of the department may explain some of these differences, three other department-level variables appear to be influential: (i) the department manager's preferences for EUC support sources, (ii) the department manager's perceptions of EUC risks, and (iii) EUC policies at the department level. Our findings imply that department-level context variables need to be taken into account in future EUC research, and a ‘one size fits all’ approach to EUC support and control may not be the most effective IS management approach in practice.

[1]  Gary Moore,et al.  Expansion and Control of End-User Computing , 1988, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Clinton E. White,et al.  Structure and function of information centers: Case studies of six organizations , 1987, Inf. Manag..

[3]  Leon A. Kappelman,et al.  Converging end-user and corporate computing , 1993, CACM.

[4]  Susan J. Winter,et al.  Misplaced resources? Factors associated with computer literacy among end-users , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[5]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  An Empirical Study of Peer Influence on User Attitudes, Behavior, and Performance , 1994, ICIS.

[6]  Lynn W. Hammond,et al.  Management Considerations for an Information Center , 1982, IBM Syst. J..

[7]  Mary Sumner,et al.  The relationship of application risks to application controls: a study of microcomputer-based database applications , 1991, SIGCPR '91.

[8]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  The Adoption of Spreadsheet Software: Testing Innovation Diffusion Theory in the Context of End-User Computing , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Information Centers as Organizational Innovation: Exploring the Correlates of Implementation Success , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Donald L. Amoroso Effectiveness of end-user developed applications in organizations: an empirical investigation , 1986, DATB.

[11]  Maryam Alavi,et al.  Managing the Risks Associated with End-User Computing , 1985, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Mary Sumner,et al.  Information systems strategy and end-user application development , 1987, DATB.

[13]  David H. Benson A Field Study of End User Computing: Findings and Issues , 1983, MIS Q..

[14]  Paul H. Cheney,et al.  Organizational Factors Affecting the Success of End-User Computing , 1986, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Microcomputer applications: An empirical look at usage , 1989, Inf. Manag..

[16]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Influence of Experience on Personal Computer Utilization: Testing a Conceptual Model , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  The management of end-user computing: status and directions , 1993, CSUR.

[18]  Houston H. Carr Information Centers: The IBM Model vs. Practice , 1987, MIS Q..

[19]  Mary Sumner,et al.  The Relationship of Application Risks to Application Controls: A Study of Microcomputer-based Spreadsheet Applications , 1994 .

[20]  John F. Rockart,et al.  End-user computing: are you a leader or a laggard , 1986 .

[21]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[22]  SwansonE. Burton,et al.  Information centers as organizational innovation , 1992 .

[23]  Houston H. Carr,et al.  Are information centers responsive to end user needs? , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[24]  Donald L. Amoroso,et al.  Quality end user-developed applications: some essential ingredients , 1992, DATB.

[25]  Maria Jean Johnstone Hall A risk and control-oriented study of the practices of spreadsheet application developers , 1996, Proceedings of HICSS-29: 29th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[26]  Emdad H. Khan The effects of information centers on the growth of end user computing , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[27]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Testing the Determinants of Microcomputer Usage via a Structural Equation Model , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Boas Shamir,et al.  Security-related behavior of PC users in organizations , 1991, Inf. Manag..

[29]  Philip J. Pyburn Managing Personal Computer Use: The Role of Corporate Management Information Systems , 1987, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[31]  Denis M. S. Lee Usage Patterns and Sources of Assistance for Personal Computer Users , 1986, MIS Q..

[32]  Rob Kling,et al.  Implementing desktop computing, infrastructure, and quality of worklife , 1989, ICIS '89.

[33]  Richard L. Jenson End-user control environments and the accounting managers' perceived quality of the applications , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[34]  William R. King,et al.  Impacts of End-User and Information Center Characteristics on End-User Computing Support , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[35]  D. R. Lawrence,et al.  A Study of End User Computing and the Provision of Tool Support to Advance End User Empowerment , 1996 .