Virtual reality robotic surgery simulation curriculum to teach robotic suturing: a randomized controlled trial

The objective of this randomized, controlled trial was to assess whether voluntary participation in a proctored, proficiency-based, virtual reality robotic suturing curriculum using the da Vinci® Skills Simulator™ improves robotic suturing performance. Residents and attending surgeons were randomized to participation or non-participation during a 5 week training curriculum. Robotic suturing skills were evaluated before and after training using an inanimate vaginal cuff model, which participants sutured for 10 min using the da Vinci® Surgical System. Performances were videotaped, anonymized, and subsequently graded independently by three robotic surgeons. 27 participants were randomized. 23 of the 27 completed both the pre- and post-test, 13 in the training group and 10 in the control group. Mean training time in the intervention group was 238 ± 136 min (SD) over the 5 weeks. The primary outcome (improvement in GOALS+ score) and the secondary outcomes (improvement in GEARS, total knots, satisfactory knots, and the virtual reality suture sponge 1 task) were significantly greater in the training group than the control group in unadjusted analysis. After adjusting for lower baseline scores in the training group, improvement in the suture sponge 1 task remained significantly greater in the training group and a trend was demonstrated to greater improvement in the training group for the GOALS+ score, GEARS score, total knots, and satisfactory knots.

[1]  K. Jardon,et al.  Advancing Surgical Simulation in Gynecologic Oncology: Robotic Dissection of a Novel Pelvic Lymphadenectomy Model , 2015, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[2]  Laura Drudi,et al.  Validation of the da Vinci Surgical Skill Simulator across three surgical disciplines: A pilot study. , 2013, Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada.

[3]  R. Reznick,et al.  Teaching surgical skills--changes in the wind. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  I. Gill,et al.  Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[5]  Gerald M. Fried,et al.  Certification pass rate of 100% for fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skills after proficiency-based training , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[6]  Nabeel A. Arain,et al.  Proficiency-based training for robotic surgery: construct validity, workload, and expert levels for nine inanimate exercises , 2012, Surgical Endoscopy.

[7]  T. Grantcharov,et al.  Designing a proficiency-based, content validated virtual reality curriculum for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a Delphi approach. , 2012, Surgery.

[8]  Melina C Vassiliou,et al.  A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. , 2005, American journal of surgery.

[9]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Current status of validation for robotic surgery simulators – a systematic review , 2013, BJU international.

[10]  Linda S. Hynan,et al.  Comprehensive proficiency-based inanimate training for robotic surgery: reliability, feasibility, and educational benefit , 2012, Surgical Endoscopy.

[11]  M. Finan,et al.  A novel method for training residents in robotic hysterectomy , 2010, Journal of robotic surgery.

[12]  A. Goh,et al.  Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[13]  G. Dulan,et al.  Content and face validity of a comprehensive robotic skills training program for general surgery, urology, and gynecology. , 2012, American journal of surgery.

[14]  Melina C Vassiliou,et al.  Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room-a randomized controlled trial. , 2010, American journal of surgery.

[15]  Elspeth M McDougall,et al.  Validation study of a virtual reality robotic simulator--role as an assessment tool? , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[16]  Jie Cai,et al.  Concurrent and predictive validation of a novel robotic surgery simulator: a prospective, randomized study. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[17]  G. Fried,et al.  Proving the Value of Simulation in Laparoscopic Surgery , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[18]  Elisabeth A. Pimentel,et al.  Proficiency-based Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery skills training results in durable performance improvement and a uniform certification pass rate , 2010, Surgical Endoscopy.

[19]  Inderbir S. Gill,et al.  Comparative assessment of three standardized robotic surgery training methods , 2013, BJU international.

[20]  Kenneth F Schulz,et al.  Allocation concealment in randomised trials: defending against deciphering , 2002, The Lancet.

[21]  Michael A Liss,et al.  Robotic Surgical Simulation , 2013, Cancer journal.

[22]  A. Fellner,et al.  Robotic Virtual Reality Simulation Plus Standard Robotic Orientation Versus Standard Robotic Orientation Alone: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2013, Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery.

[23]  S. J. Marecik,et al.  A lifelike patient simulator for teaching robotic colorectal surgery: how to acquire skills for robotic rectal dissection , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[24]  J. J. Jakimowicz,et al.  Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.