The subjective mode of comparison: Metalinguistic comparatives in Greek and Korean

In this paper, we present a striking parallel between Greek and Korean in the formation and interpretation of metalinguistic comparatives. The initial observation is that both languages show an empirical contrast between ordinary and metalinguistic comparatives realized in two places: (a) in the form of a designated metalinguistic comparative MORE, and (b) in the form of THAN employed. We propose (building on earlier ideas in Giannakidou and Stavrou 2009; Giannakidou and Yoon 2009) that the metalinguistic comparative is subjective and attitudinal, i.e. it introduces the point of view of an individual towards a sentence—and argue that the individual expresses invariably an attitude of preference: she prefers one sentence (the sentence itself, or the proposition it expresses) in a given context over another. The preference may come out as completely negative in certain cases, and this is manifested as yet another MORE lexicalization in Korean (charari), which selects nuni-THAN, which itself carries a negative expressive index (in the sense of Potts 2007b), we will claim. Expressive negativity is not equivalent to negation in syntax, as nuni alone cannot license NPIs that need negation.If our analysis is correct, it has one important implication that goes beyond just the metalinguistic comparatives in the individual languages we are considering. It allows the generalization that metalinguistic functions in language are indeed part of the grammar. In particular, they are reflexes of grammaticalization of perspective and subjective mode, on a par with predicates of personal taste discussed by Lasersohn (2005, 2008, 2009), mood choice, and similar phenomena. In comparatives, subjective mode is manifested as an attitude of preference, with possible addition of expressive meaning.

[1]  K. Drozd,et al.  Child English pre-sentential negation as metalinguistic exclamatory sentence negation , 1995, Journal of Child Language.

[2]  Anastasia Giannakidou,et al.  Only, Emotive Factive Verbs, and the Dual Nature of Polarity Dependency , 2006 .

[3]  A. Stechow COMPARING SEMANTIC THEORIES OF COMPARISON , 1984 .

[4]  Anastasia Giannakidou,et al.  Polarity sensitivity as (non) veridical dependency , 2000 .

[5]  Christopher Potts,et al.  Japanese Honorifics as Emotive Definite Descriptions , 2004 .

[6]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar , 1996, CL.

[7]  E. Villalta Mood and gradability: an investigation of the subjunctive mood in Spanish , 2008 .

[8]  Max Kölbel,et al.  III—Faultless Disagreement , 2004 .

[9]  T. Stephenson Judge dependence, epistemic modals, and predicates of personal taste , 2007 .

[10]  Paul M. Postal,et al.  Skeptical Linguistic Essays , 2004 .

[11]  Richard K. Larson,et al.  Scope and comparatives , 1988 .

[12]  Irene Heim,et al.  Presupposition Projection and the Semantics of Attitude Verbs , 1992, J. Semant..

[13]  Peter Nathan Lasersohn,et al.  QUANTIFICATION AND PERSPECTIVE IN RELATIVIST SEMANTICS , 2008 .

[14]  Peter Sells,et al.  Korean honorification: a kind of expressive meaning , 2007 .

[15]  Laurence R. Horn A Natural History of Negation , 1989 .

[16]  Christopher Potts The expressive dimension , 2007 .

[17]  Laurence R. Horn,et al.  Negation and polarity : syntactic and semantic perspectives , 2000 .

[18]  I. Heim Degree Operators and Scope , 2000 .

[19]  ALEXANDER GROSU ON THE ANALOGICAL EXTENSION OF RULE DOMAINS , 1980 .

[20]  Christopher Potts The logic of conventional implicatures , 2004 .

[21]  Anastasia Giannakidou,et al.  The Meaning of Free Choice , 2001 .

[22]  J. Merchant Phrasal and clausal comparatives in Greek and the abstractness of syntax , 2009 .

[23]  Paul Portner,et al.  Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning , 2011 .

[24]  Jae-Woong Choe Obligatory Honorification and the Honorific Feature , 2004 .

[25]  Jong-Bok Kim,et al.  Parsing Korean Honorification Phenomena in a Typed Feature Structure Grammar , 2006, Canadian Conference on AI.

[26]  METAMETACOMPARATIVES: COMMENTS ON 'METALINGUISTIC CONTRAST IN THE GRAMMAR OF GREEK' , 2007 .

[27]  Joan Bresnan,et al.  Syntax of the Comparative Clause Construction in English , 1973 .

[28]  Peter Lasersohn,et al.  Relative truth, speaker commitment, and control of implicit arguments , 2007, Synthese.

[29]  Emmon W. Bach,et al.  Universals in Linguistic Theory , 1970 .

[30]  In-Seok Yang,et al.  Semantics of Delimiters , 1973 .

[31]  David Embick,et al.  Blocking Effects and Analytic/synthetic Alternations , 2007 .

[32]  Noah Constant,et al.  The pragmatics of expressive content: Evidence from large corpora , 2009 .

[33]  Marcin Morzycki,et al.  Metalinguistic comparison in an alternative semantics for imprecision , 2011 .

[34]  James D. McCawley,et al.  The syntactic phenomena of English , 1988 .

[35]  Aram A. Yengoyan,et al.  Modes of Comparison , 2006 .

[36]  Peter Nathan Lasersohn,et al.  Context Dependence, Disagreement, and Predicates of Personal Taste* , 2005 .

[37]  R. Pancheva,et al.  Late Merger of Degree Clauses , 2004, Linguistic Inquiry.

[38]  David Holton,et al.  Greek: a comprehensive grammar of the modern language: a response , 1997, Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies.

[39]  F. Ordóñez,et al.  Clitic positions within the Left Periphery: evidence for a phonological buffer , 2005 .

[40]  D. Farkas On the Semantics of Subjunctive Complements , 1992 .

[41]  Ho-min Sohn The Korean language , 1999 .