Assessment of Myoelectric Controller Performance and Kinematic Behavior of a Novel Soft Synergy-Inspired Robotic Hand for Prosthetic Applications

Myoelectric artificial limbs can significantly advance the state of the art in prosthetics, since they can be used to control mechatronic devices through muscular activity in a way that mimics how the subjects used to activate their muscles before limb loss. However, surveys indicate that dissatisfaction with the functionality of terminal devices underlies the widespread abandonment of prostheses. We believe that one key factor to improve acceptability of prosthetic devices is to attain human likeness of prosthesis movements, a goal which is being pursued by research on social and human–robot interactions. Therefore, to reduce early abandonment of terminal devices, we propose that controllers should be designed so as to ensure effective task accomplishment in a natural fashion. In this work, we have analyzed and compared the performance of three types of myoelectric controller algorithms based on surface electromyography to control an underactuated and multi-degrees of freedom prosthetic hand, the SoftHand Pro. The goal of the present study was to identify the myoelectric algorithm that best mimics the native hand movements. As a preliminary step, we first quantified the repeatability of the SoftHand Pro finger movements and identified the electromyographic recording sites for able-bodied individuals with the highest signal-to-noise ratio from two pairs of muscles, i.e., flexor digitorum superficialis/extensor digitorum communis, and flexor carpi radialis/extensor carpi ulnaris. Able-bodied volunteers were then asked to execute reach-to-grasp movements, while electromyography signals were recorded from flexor digitorum superficialis/extensor digitorum communis as this was identified as the muscle pair characterized by high signal-to-noise ratio and intuitive control. Subsequently, we tested three myoelectric controllers that mapped electromyography signals to position of the SoftHand Pro. We found that a differential electromyography-to-position mapping ensured the highest coherence with hand movements. Our results represent a first step toward a more effective and intuitive control of myoelectric hand prostheses.

[1]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  A synergy-driven approach to a myoelectric hand , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[2]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[3]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[4]  S Micera,et al.  Control of Hand Prostheses Using Peripheral Information , 2010, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Tele-impedance: Towards transferring human impedance regulation skills to robots , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Underactuated Robotic Hands , 2008, Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics.

[7]  Dario Farina,et al.  Bionic reconstruction to restore hand function after brachial plexus injury: a case series of three patients , 2015, The Lancet.

[8]  Luca Citi,et al.  Restoring Natural Sensory Feedback in Real-Time Bidirectional Hand Prostheses , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[9]  Peter Robinson,et al.  How anthropomorphism affects empathy toward robots , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[10]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Adaptive synergies for a humanoid robot hand , 2012, 2012 12th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids 2012).

[11]  C. K. Battye,et al.  The use of myo-electric currents in the operation of prostheses. , 1955, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Exploring Teleimpedance and Tactile Feedback for Intuitive Control of the Pisa/IIT SoftHand , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[13]  Claudio Castellini,et al.  A realistic implementation of ultrasound imaging as a human-machine interface for upper-limb amputees , 2013, Front. Neurorobot..

[14]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Modelling natural and artificial hands with synergies , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Adaptive synergies for the design and control of the Pisa/IIT SoftHand , 2014, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[16]  Monica Malvezzi,et al.  The Sixth-Finger: A modular extra-finger to enhance human hand capabilities , 2014, The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[17]  Matteo Bianchi,et al.  Hand synergies: Integration of robotics and neuroscience for understanding the control of biological and artificial hands. , 2016, Physics of life reviews.

[18]  C. Murray Embodiment and Prosthetics , 2008 .

[19]  Ning Jiang,et al.  Extracting Simultaneous and Proportional Neural Control Information for Multiple-DOF Prostheses From the Surface Electromyographic Signal , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  Fine detection of grasp force and posture by amputees via surface electromyography , 2009, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[21]  Cosimo Della Santina,et al.  Dexterity augmentation on a synergistic hand: The Pisa/IIT SoftHand+ , 2015, 2015 IEEE-RAS 15th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids).

[22]  Matteo Bianchi,et al.  A data-driven kinematic model of the human hand with soft-tissue artifact compensation mechanism for grasp synergy analysis , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[23]  Panagiotis K. Artemiadis,et al.  Proceedings of the first workshop on Peripheral Machine Interfaces: going beyond traditional surface electromyography , 2014, Front. Neurorobot..

[24]  Panagiotis Artemiadis,et al.  A hybrid BMI-based exoskeleton for paresis: EMG control for assisting arm movements , 2017, Journal of neural engineering.

[25]  C. Fraser,et al.  Does an Artificial Limb Become Part of the User? , 1984 .

[26]  Panagiotis K. Artemiadis,et al.  Proportional Myoelectric Control of Robots: Muscle Synergy Development Drives Performance Enhancement, Retainment, and Generalization , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[27]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Teleimpedance control of a synergy-driven anthropomorphic hand , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[28]  H. Stassen,et al.  A field evaluation of arm prostheses for unilateral amputees , 1983, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[29]  Siddhartha S. Srinivasa,et al.  Integrating human observer inferences into robot motion planning , 2014, Auton. Robots.

[30]  Max Ortiz-Catalan,et al.  An osseointegrated human-machine gateway for long-term sensory feedback and motor control of artificial limbs , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[31]  T. Hortobágyi,et al.  Teager-Kaiser Operator improves the accuracy of EMG onset detection independent of signal-to-noise ratio. , 2008, Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics.

[32]  Nitish V. Thakor,et al.  Decoding of Individuated Finger Movements Using Surface Electromyography , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[33]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Grasping with Soft Hands , 2014, 2014 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[34]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Postural Hand Synergies for Tool Use , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.