Bayesian methodology to stochastic capture zone determination: Conditioning on transmissivity measurements

[1] A methodology to determine the uncertainty associated with the delineation of well capture zones in heterogeneous aquifers is presented. The log transmissivity field is modeled as a random space function and the Bayesian paradigm accounts for the uncertainty that stems from the imperfect knowledge about the parameters of the stochastic model. Unknown parameters are treated as random quantities and characterized by a prior probability distribution. Log transmissivity measurements are incorporated into Bayes' theorem, updating the prior distribution and yielding posterior estimates of the mean value and the covariance parameters of the log transmissivity. Conditional simulations of the log transmissivity field are generated using samples from the posterior distribution of the parameters, yielding samples from the predictive distribution of the log transmissivity field. The uncertainty in the model parameters is propagated to the predictive uncertainty of the capture zone by solving numerically the groundwater flow equation, followed by a semianalytical particle-tracking algorithm. The method is applied to a set of hypothetical flow fields for various sampling densities and assuming different levels of parameter uncertainty. Simulation results for all the sampling densities show no univocal relation between the predictive uncertainty of the capture zones and the level of parameter uncertainty. However, in general, the predictive uncertainty increases when parameter uncertainty is taken into account.

[1]  J. Delhomme Kriging in the hydrosciences , 1978 .

[2]  J. Chilès,et al.  Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty , 1999 .

[3]  Matthijs van Leeuwen,et al.  Stochastic determination of well capture zones conditioned on regular grids of transmissivity measurements , 2000 .

[4]  Estimating the theoretical semivariogram from finite numbers of measurements , 2000 .

[5]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[6]  Andrew L. Rukhin,et al.  Tools for statistical inference , 1991 .

[7]  J. Bear,et al.  On the movement of water bodies injected into aquifers , 1965 .

[8]  Matthijs van Leeuwen,et al.  Stochastic determination of well capture zones , 1998 .

[9]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Analysis of the Spatial Structure of Properties of Selected Aquifers , 1985 .

[10]  J. M. Shafer,et al.  Approximation of confidence limits on sample semivariograms from single realizations of spatially correlated random fields. , 1990 .

[11]  P. Kitanidis Parameter Uncertainty in Estimation of Spatial Functions: Bayesian Analysis , 1986 .

[12]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1998 .

[13]  P. Diggle,et al.  Bayesian Inference in Gaussian Model-based Geostatistics , 2002 .

[14]  Alberto Guadagnini,et al.  Time-related capture zones for radial flow in two dimensional randomly heterogeneous media , 1999 .

[15]  J. M. Shafer,et al.  Assessment of Uncertainty in Time‐Related Capture Zones Using Conditional Simulation of Hydraulic Conductivity , 1991 .

[16]  Peter J. Diggle,et al.  An Introduction to Model-Based Geostatistics , 2003 .

[17]  W. Jury,et al.  A theoretical study of the estimation of the correlation scale in spatially variable fields: 2. Nonstationary fields , 1987 .

[18]  Henning Omre,et al.  The Bayesian bridge between simple and universal kriging , 1989 .

[19]  M. Stein,et al.  A Bayesian analysis of kriging , 1993 .

[20]  Keith Beven,et al.  Stochastic capture zone delineation within the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation methodology: Conditioning on head observations , 2001 .

[21]  Alberto Guadagnini,et al.  Time‐Related Capture Zones for Contaminants in Randomly Heterogeneous Formations , 1999 .

[22]  Alberto Guadagnini,et al.  Probabilistic estimation of well catchments in heterogeneous aquifers , 1996 .

[23]  R. Freeze A stochastic‐conceptual analysis of one‐dimensional groundwater flow in nonuniform homogeneous media , 1975 .