Structural modelling and testing of failed high energy pipe runs: 2D and 3D pipe whip

Abstract The sudden rupture of a high energy piping system is a safety-related issue and has been the subject of extensive study and discussed in several industrial reports (e.g. [2] , [3] , [4] ). The dynamic plastic response of the deforming pipe segment under the blow-down force of the escaping liquid is termed pipe whip. Because of the potential damage that such an event could cause, various geometric and kinematic features of this phenomenon have been modelled from the point of view of dynamic structural plasticity. After a comprehensive summary of the behaviour of in-plane deformation of pipe runs [9] , [10] that deform in 2D in a plane, the more complicated case of 3D out-of-plane deformation is discussed. Both experimental studies and modelling using analytical and FE methods have been carried out and they show that, for a good estimate of the “hazard zone” when unconstrained pipe whip motion could occur, a large displacement analysis is essential. The classical, rigid plastic, small deflection analysis (e.g. see [2] , [8] ), is valid for estimating the initial failure mechanisms, however it is insufficient for describing the details and consequences of large deflection behaviour.

[1]  Stephen R Reid,et al.  Pipe Whip: In-plane whipping of bent cantilever pipes , 1998 .

[2]  Tongxi Yu,et al.  Experimental study and numerical simulation of pipe-on-pipe impact , 2009 .

[3]  Stephen R Reid,et al.  Development of double hinge mechanisms in a bent cantilever subjected to an out-of-plane force pulse , 1990 .

[4]  M. R. Baum,et al.  The rupture of high pressure pipework: The influence of pipeline geometry on in-plane pipewhip , 1996 .

[5]  Tongxi Yu,et al.  Hardening-softening behaviour of circular pipes under bending and tension , 1994 .

[6]  Tongxi Yu,et al.  Double-hinge modes in the dynamic response of plastic cantilever beams subjected to step loading , 1988 .

[7]  S. R. Reid,et al.  An elastic–plastic hardening–softening cantilever beam subjected to a force pulse at its tip: a model for pipe whip , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[8]  Stephen R Reid,et al.  Dynamic elastic-plastic behaviour of whipping pipes: experiments and theoretical model , 1996 .

[9]  Stephen R Reid,et al.  Non-linear dynamic analysis of cantilever whipping pipes , 1998 .

[10]  Bin Wang,et al.  Out-of-Plane Pipe Whip for a Bent Cantilever Pipe: Comparison Between Experiment and FEM Models , 2012 .

[11]  Stephen R Reid,et al.  Yield mechanisms of a bent cantilever beam subjected to a suddenly applied constant out-of-plane tip force , 1995 .

[12]  Debasish Roy,et al.  A Gaussian sinc‐collocation approach for a whipping cantilever with a follower shear force at its tip , 2003 .

[13]  J. B. Martin,et al.  MODE APPROXIMATIONS FOR IMPULSIVELY LOADED RIGID PLASTIC STRUCTURES , 1965 .

[14]  Stephen R Reid,et al.  Out-of-Plane Impact at the Tip of a Right-Angled Bent Cantilever Beam , 1995 .

[15]  Tongxi Yu,et al.  Dynamic Models for Structural Plasticity , 1993 .

[16]  Debasish Roy,et al.  Reproducing kernel collocation method applied to the non-linear dynamics of pipe whip in a plane , 2007 .

[17]  Stephen R Reid,et al.  Triple plastic hinge mechanism for a bent cantilever beam subjected to an out-of-plane tip force pulse of finite duration , 1995 .

[18]  W. Johnson,et al.  The plastic hinge position in a bent cantilever struck normal to its plane by a steady jet applied at its tip , 1985 .