Examining the role of Web site information in facilitating different citizen-government relationships: A case study of state Chronic Wasting Disease Web sites

Abstract This paper develops a framework to assess the text-based public information provided on program level government agency Web sites. The framework informs the larger e-government question of how, or whether, state administrative agencies are using Web sites in a transformative capacity—to change relationships between citizens and government. It focuses on assessing the degree to which text information provided on government Web sites could facilitate various relationships between government agencies and citizens. The framework incorporates four views of government information obligations stemming from different assumptions about citizen–government relationships in a democracy: the private citizen view, the attentive citizen view, the deliberative citizen view, and the citizen–publisher view. Each view suggests inclusion of different types of information on government agency web sites. The framework is employed to assess state Web sites containing information about chronic wasting disease, a disease effecting deer and elk in numerous U.S. states and Canada.

[1]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  Interactive E-Government: Evaluating the Web Site of the UK Inland Revenue , 2004, J. Electron. Commer. Organ..

[2]  Mary Tschirhart,et al.  Public information campaigns as policy instruments , 1994 .

[3]  C. Weare,et al.  Designing Web Technologies for Local Governance Reform: Good Management or Good Democracy? , 2000 .

[4]  M. J. Moon.  The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? , 2002 .

[5]  A. Seidl,et al.  Potential Economic Impacts of Chronic Wasting Disease in Colorado , 2004 .

[6]  Rowena Cullen,et al.  Democracy online: an assessment of New Zealand government web sites , 2000, Gov. Inf. Q..

[7]  Nancy C. Roberts,et al.  Public Deliberation: An Alternative Approach to Crafting Policy and Setting Direction. , 1997 .

[8]  W. Williams.  Why people don't trust government , 1998 .

[9]  C. Sigurdson,et al.  Prions in Skeletal Muscles of Deer with Chronic Wasting Disease , 2006, Science.

[10]  R. Bishop.  The Economic Impacts of Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) in Wisconsin , 2004 .

[11]  John Halligan,et al.  Toward Participatory and Transparent Governance: Report on the Sixth Global Forum on Reinventing Government: , 2005 .

[12]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1996 .

[13]  B. Wynne,et al.  Misunderstanding science? : the public reconstruction of science and technology , 1996 .

[14]  Vincent T. Covello,et al.  Effective risk communication : the role and responsibility of government and nongovernment organizations , 1989 .

[15]  R. Garry,et al.  Linking chronic wasting disease to scrapie by comparison of Spiroplasma mirum ribosomal DNA sequences. , 2004, Experimental and molecular pathology.

[16]  J. Fountain.  Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change , 2001 .

[17]  J.Timothy Sprehe,et al.  OMB Circular No. A-130, the management of federal information resources: Its origins and impact , 1987 .

[18]  C. May,et al.  Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet: “e-Government” in the United States, Britain, and the European Union , 2003 .

[19]  T. Heberlein.  “Fire in the Sistine Chapel”: How Wisconsin Responded to Chronic Wasting Disease , 2004 .

[20]  Stuart W. Shulman.  E-Rulemaking: Issues in Current Research and Practice [1] , 2005 .

[21]  E. Welch,et al.  Virtual Interactivity Between Government and Citizens: The Chicago Police Department's Citizen ICAM Application Demonstration Case , 2005 .

[22]  Eran Vigoda.  From Responsiveness to Collaboration: Governance, Citizens, and the Next Generation of Public Administration , 2002 .

[23]  Kristin R. Eschenfelder,et al.  Behind the Web site: An inside look at the production of Web-based textual government information , 2004, Gov. Inf. Q..

[24]  Bruce Bimber.  Information and American Democracy: Technology in the Evolution of Political Power , 2003 .

[25]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. , 1991 .

[26]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science , 1992 .

[27]  Billie Jo Hance,et al.  Improving Risk Communication in Government: Research Priorities , 1995 .

[28]  Kristin R. Eschenfelder,et al.  Assessing U.S. federal government websites , 1997 .

[29]  J. Vaske,et al.  Hunters’ Behavior and Acceptance of Management Actions Related to Chronic Wasting Disease in Eight States , 2004 .

[30]  John S. Walters.  U.S. Government Publication: Ideological Development and Institutional Politics from the Founding to 1970 , 2005 .

[31]  J. Vaske,et al.  Chronic Wasting Disease in Wisconsin: Hunter Behavior, Perceived Risk, and Agency Trust , 2004 .

[32]  Penny Leonard.  Promoting Welfare?: Government Information Policy and Social Citizenship , 2003 .

[33]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[34]  J. Burkell,et al.  What are the chances? Evaluating risk and benefit information in consumer health materials. , 2004, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[35]  Les Gasser,et al.  Assessing Information Quality of a Community-Based Encyclopedia , 2005, ICIQ.

[36]  J. C. Thomas,et al.  The New Face of Government: Citizen-Initiated Contacts in the Era of E-Government , 2003 .

[37]  C. Demchak,et al.  Democracy and Bureaucracy in the Age of the Web , 2002 .

[38]  M. J. Moon,et al.  Advancing E‐Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or Hare? , 2005 .