Intensity modulated radiation therapy with field rotation—a time-varying fractionation study

This paper proposes a novel mathematical approach to the beam selection problem in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning. The approach allows more beams to be used over the course of therapy while limiting the number of beams required in any one session. In the proposed field rotation method, several sets of beams are interchanged throughout the treatment to allow a wider selection of beam angles than would be possible with fixed beam orientations. The choice of beamlet intensities and the number of identical fractions for each set are determined by a mixed integer linear program that controls jointly for the distribution per fraction and the cumulative dose distribution delivered to targets and critical structures. Trials showed the method allowed substantial increases in the dose objective and/or sparing of normal tissues while maintaining cumulative and fraction size limits. Trials for a head and neck site showed gains of 25%–35% in the objective (average tumor dose) and for a thoracic site gains were 7%–13%, depending on how strict the fraction size limits were set. The objective did not rise for a prostate site significantly, but the tolerance limits on normal tissues could be strengthened with the use of multiple beam sets.

[1]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Beam angle optimization and reduction for intensity-modulated radiation therapy of non-small-cell lung cancers. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  Similarities between static and rotational intensity-modulated plans. , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  S. Webb,et al.  Direct-aperture optimization applied to selection of beam orientations in intensity-modulated radiation therapy , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  J. Shapiro,et al.  Large scale optimization of beam weights under dose-volume restrictions. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  I. Rosen,et al.  Treatment plan optimization using linear programming. , 1991, Medical physics.

[6]  Gintaras V. Reklaitis,et al.  IMRT Optimization with Both Fractionation and Cumulative Constraints , 2011 .

[7]  T. Holmes,et al.  A comparison of three inverse treatment planning algorithms. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Horst W. Hamacher,et al.  Inverse Radiation Therapy Planning: A Multiple Objective Optimisation Approach , 1999 .

[9]  K. Burnham,et al.  Optimization of beam orientation in radiotherapy using planar geometry. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  P. Lambin,et al.  Individualized radical radiotherapy of non-small-cell lung cancer based on normal tissue dose constraints: a feasibility study. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Number and orientations of beams in intensity-modulated radiation treatments. , 1997, Medical physics.

[12]  Shuang Luan,et al.  Comparing radiation treatments using intensity-modulated beams, multiple arcs, and single arcs. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Wufan Chen,et al.  A particle swarm optimization algorithm for beam angle selection in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Ronald L. Rardin,et al.  A coupled column generation, mixed integer approach to optimal planning of intensity modulated radiation therapy for cancer , 2004, Math. Program..

[15]  Arvind Kumar,et al.  Neighborhood search approaches to beam orientation optimization in intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning , 2008, J. Glob. Optim..

[16]  Q. Hou,et al.  An optimization algorithm for intensity modulated radiotherapy--the simulated dynamics with dose-volume constraints. , 2002, Medical physics.

[17]  H. Romeijn,et al.  A unifying framework for multi-criteria fluence map optimization models. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  Seza Orcun,et al.  Target volume uncertainty and a method to visualize its effect on the target dose prescription. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  L M Chin,et al.  Sampling techniques for the evaluation of treatment plans. , 1993, Medical physics.

[20]  A. Brahme,et al.  Which is the most suitable number of photon beam portals in coplanar radiation therapy? , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  D. Craft Local beam angle optimization with linear programming and gradient search , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  M Goitein,et al.  Comments on "Sampling techniques for the evaluation of treatment plans" [Med. Phys. 20, 151-161 (1993)]. , 1993, Medical physics.

[23]  Cedric X. Yu,et al.  Intensity-modulated arc therapy with dynamic multileaf collimation: an alternative to tomotherapy. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Iterative solution methods for beam angle and fluence map optimization in intensity modulated radiation therapy planning , 2008, OR Spectr..

[25]  S. Spirou,et al.  A gradient inverse planning algorithm with dose-volume constraints. , 1998, Medical physics.

[26]  J. Kereiakes,et al.  The method of linear programming applied to radiation treatment planning. , 1968, Radiology.

[27]  C G Rowbottom,et al.  Beam-orientation customization using an artificial neural network. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  John W. Chinneck,et al.  Operations Research and Cyber-Infrastructure , 2009 .

[29]  A. Boyer,et al.  Beam orientation optimization in intensity-modulated radiation treatment planning. , 2000, Medical physics.

[30]  Ronald L. Rardin,et al.  Strong valid inequalities for fluence map optimization problem under dose-volume restrictions , 2012, Ann. Oper. Res..

[31]  Y. Li,et al.  Automatic beam angle selection in IMRT planning using genetic algorithm. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  Eva K. Lee,et al.  Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[33]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Algorithm and performance of a clinical IMRT beam-angle optimization system. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  Leyuan Shi,et al.  Selection of beam orientations in intensity-modulated radiation therapy using single-beam indices and integer programming. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  Optimization of relative weights and wedge angles in treatment planning. , 1997, Medical physics.

[36]  C C Ling,et al.  When becometh less more? , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[37]  C G Rowbottom,et al.  Improvements in prostate radiotherapy from the customization of beam directions. , 1998, Medical physics.

[38]  Jianrong Dai,et al.  Optimization of beam orientations and beam weights for conformal radiotherapy using mixed integer programming. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[39]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Optimization of beam orientations in radiation therapy: some theoretical considerations. , 1993, Physics in medicine and biology.

[40]  Ronald L. Rardin,et al.  Adaptive intensity modulated radiation therapy planning optimization with changing tumor geometry and fraction size limits , 2011 .

[41]  H. Edwin Romeijn,et al.  A Response Surface Approach to Beam Orientation Optimization in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning , 2009, INFORMS J. Comput..

[43]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Effectiveness of noncoplanar IMRT planning using a parallelized multiresolution beam angle optimization method for paranasal sinus carcinoma. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[44]  P. Storchi,et al.  Automated selection of beam orientations and segmented intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for treatment of oesophagus tumors. , 2005, Radiotherapy and Oncology.

[45]  I. Rosen,et al.  The influence of dose constraint point placement on optimized radiation therapy treatment planning. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[46]  Leyuan Shi,et al.  A nested partitions framework for beam angle optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[47]  Steve Webb,et al.  Single-Arc IMRT? , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[48]  I I Rosen,et al.  Dose-volume considerations with linear programming optimization. , 1991, Medical physics.

[49]  Philippe Lambin,et al.  Mature results of an individualized radiation dose prescription study based on normal tissue constraints in stages I to III non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[50]  T LoSasso,et al.  Treatment planning and delivery of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for primary nasopharynx cancer. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[51]  R Mohan,et al.  Comments on "Sampling techniques for the evaluation of treatment plans" [Med. Phys. 20, 151-161 (1993)]. , 1993, Medical physics.

[52]  L. Xing,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary optimization of the number of beams, their orientations and weights for intensity-modulated radiation therapy , 2004, Physics in Medicine and Biology.

[53]  Bill J. Salter,et al.  Radiotherapy optimAl Design: An Academic Radiotherapy Treatment Design System , 2009 .

[54]  Boyd McCurdy,et al.  A simple geometric algorithm to predict optimal starting gantry angles using equiangular-spaced beams for intensity modulated radiation therapy of prostate cancer. , 2007, Medical physics.

[55]  A. Niemierko,et al.  Random sampling for evaluating treatment plans. , 1990, Medical physics.