Acculturation, discrimination, and adaptation among second generation immigrant youth in Montreal and Paris

Abstract Research with immigrant youth has shown that they have a variety of orientations to their acculturation process. These different paths (“acculturation strategies”) have been described in terms of assimilation , integration , marginalisation and separation (AIMS). This research has also shown that there are variable adaptations or outcomes to acculturation. Of greatest importance is the finding that these variations in adaptation are usually related to the acculturation strategies that youth use. Generally, those who involve themselves in both their heritage culture and that of the national society (by way of integration ) have the most positive psychological well-being, and are most adjusted in school and in the community; in contrast, those who are minimally involved with either culture (the marginalisation course), are least well-adapted; and those who are primarily oriented towards one or the other culture ( assimilation or separation ) generally fall in between these two adaptation poles. The present study examines the generality of this pattern by comparing samples from two societies that have very different policies and practices with respect immigration and acculturation: Canada and France. We measured acculturation attitudes, identity and behaviours along the two basic dimensions of cultural maintenance and social contact , and then cross-tabulated them, creating the four acculturation orientations. In both societies the usual pattern is replicated: youth who prefer integration have higher self-esteem scores than those who are marginalised; youth preferring assimilation and separation fall in between. This pattern was stronger in Canada than in France, a finding that is interpreted in terms of the differential social context faced by youth in the two societies, particularly the differing national policies and youths’ experience of discrimination.

[1]  M. E. Bernal,et al.  Family Socialization and the Ethnic Identity of Mexican-American Children , 1993 .

[2]  R. Bourhis,et al.  Towards an Interactive Acculturation Model: A Social Psychological Approach , 1997 .

[3]  U. Kim,et al.  Acculturation Attitudes in Plural Societies , 1989 .

[4]  M. Gordon.  Assimilation In American Life , 1964 .

[5]  J. Berry,et al.  Acculturation attitudes and acculturative stress of Central American refugees. , 1994 .

[6]  A. von Eye,et al.  The Acculturation Scale for Vietnamese Adolescents (ASVA): A bidimensional perspective , 2002 .

[7]  David L. Sam,et al.  Immigrant Youth in Cultural Transition : Acculturation, Identity, and Adaptation Across National Contexts , 2006 .

[8]  Dan Landis,et al.  Handbook of Intercultural Training , 2003 .

[9]  J. Berry,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Acculturation Psychology: Frontmatter , 2006 .

[10]  E. Gullone,et al.  The Relationship between Self-Esteem and Parenting Style , 1999 .

[11]  Fons J. R. Vijver,et al.  Acculturation and cognitive performance of migrant children in the Netherlands. , 1999 .

[12]  W. Vega,et al.  Acculturative stress and personal adjustment among hispanic adolescent boys , 1994 .

[13]  R. Atkinson,et al.  The Teenage World: Adolescents’ Self-Image in Ten Countries , 1988 .

[14]  W. Vollebergh,et al.  Patterns of Psychological Acculturation in Adult and Adolescent Moroccan Immigrants Living in the Netherlands , 2004 .

[15]  John W. Berry,et al.  Conceptual approaches to acculturation. , 2003 .

[16]  J. Berry.  Multicultural policy in Canada: A social psychological analysis. , 1984 .

[17]  J. Phinney.  Ethic identity and acculturation. , 2003 .

[18]  K. Liebkind.  Ethnic identity and acculturation , 2006 .

[19]  J. Berry.  Multiculturalism and ethnic attitudes in Canada , 1976 .

[20]  J. Berry,et al.  The role of family acculturation, parental style, and perceived discrimination in the adaptation of second-generation immigrant youth in France and Canada , 2008 .

[21]  J. Berry.  Immigration, Acculturation, and Adaptation , 1997 .

[22]  J. Phinney.  Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: review of research. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  J. Berry,et al.  Acculturation in Canada. , 2006 .

[24]  R. Tremblay,et al.  Identity and Disruptiveness in Boys: Longitudinal Perspectives , 2004 .

[25]  J. Berry.  Mutual attitudes among immigrants and ethnocultural groups in Canada , 2006 .

[26]  D. Rosenthal,et al.  THE MEETING OF TWO CULTURES: ETHNIC IDENTITY AND PSYCHOSOCIAL ADJUSTMENT OF ITALIAN‐AUSTRALIAN ADOLESCENTS* , 1986 .

[27]  D. Sam,et al.  Adolescents with Turkish background in Norway and Sweden: a comparative study of their psychological adaptation. , 2004, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[28]  M. Rosenberg.  Society and the adolescent self-image , 1966 .

[29]  D. Paulhus,et al.  Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes Is Acculturation Unidimensional or Bidimensional? a Head-to-head Comparison in the Prediction of Personality, Self-identity, and Adjustment the Unidimensional Perspective , 2022 .

[30]  Richard D. Harvey,et al.  Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. , 1999 .

[31]  R. Zimmerman,et al.  Cultural conflicts and problem behaviors of Latino adolescents in home and school environments , 1995 .

[32]  N. Way,et al.  Trajectories of perceived adult and peer discrimination among Black, Latino, and Asian American adolescents: patterns and psychological correlates. , 2006, Developmental psychology.