Making Progress Towards Emissions Mitigation: Modeling Low-Carbon Power Generation Policy

The need for regulation of greenhouse gases (GHGs) sets policy challenges to the energy industries in the twenty-first century, given the major climate threat that has manifested in recent decades. The focus will thus be on environment-related issues, including emissions, renewable-based technology, and change in consumer-use patterns. In this context, policy aims at preserving and maintaining security of supply as well as a competitive environment within both power generation and energy-intensive industries. There are enormous uncertainties regarding the effect of GHGs on climate change in Latin America and on the structure of the electricity sector in the future. In spite of the obvious threats, these conditions also provide opportunities not yet explored. A low-carbon policy aims at changes regarding: regulation, demand, supply, market structure, management, and in general, the competitiveness of the power generation industry. In this direction, it is neither clear what structural changes should be adopted within the electricity sector, nor what are the opportunities that this policy may offer. This article assesses the effect of GHG policy on the Colombian electricity sector, based on system dynamics simulation; it also indicates how emission costs and incentives in the electricity sector induce technology changes leading towards a low carbon economy.

[1]  Erik R. Larsen,et al.  Assessment of the uncertainty in future UK electricity investment using an industry simulation model , 1994 .

[2]  Andrew Ford,et al.  Simulation scenarios for rapid reduction in carbon dioxide emissions in the western electricity system , 2008 .

[3]  Gustavo O Collantes,et al.  Incorporating stakeholders' perspectives into models of new technology diffusion: The case of fuel-cell vehicles , 2007 .

[4]  Isaac Dyner,et al.  System Dynamics Modelling for Residential Energy Efficiency Analysis and Management , 1995 .

[5]  D. L. Kelly,et al.  Economic growth and the environment: Theory and facts , 2008 .

[6]  Karen Holm Olsen,et al.  The clean development mechanism’s contribution to sustainable development: a review of the literature , 2007 .

[7]  C. J. Franco,et al.  Consumers' Bounded Rationality: The Case of Competitive Energy Markets , 2004 .

[8]  Andrew Ford Greening the Economy with New Markets: System Dynamics Simulations of Energy and Environmental Markets , 2010 .

[9]  D. North Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[10]  Thomas S. Fiddaman,et al.  Feedback complexity in integrated climate-economy models , 1997 .

[11]  D. Newbery Privatization, Restructuring, and Regulation of Network Utilities , 2000 .

[12]  Nina Schwarz,et al.  Agent-based modeling of the diffusion of environmental innovations — An empirical approach , 2009 .

[13]  N. Stern The Economics of Climate Change: Implications of Climate Change for Development , 2007 .

[14]  J. Sterman,et al.  Cloudy Skies: Assessing Public Understanding of Global Warming , 2002 .

[15]  Nicholas A. Linacre,et al.  State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2011 , 2010 .

[16]  Andrew Ford,et al.  Estimating the Impact of Efficiency Standards on the Uncertainty of the Northwest Electric System , 1990, Oper. Res..

[17]  J. Sterman,et al.  Climate Interactive: The C-ROADS Climate Policy Model , 2012 .

[18]  Hassan Qudrat-Ullah,et al.  Understanding the dynamics of electricity supply, resources and pollution: Pakistan's case , 2001 .

[19]  V.V.N. Kishore,et al.  A review of technology diffusion models with special reference to renewable energy technologies , 2010 .

[20]  C. Hirschhausen,et al.  First evidence of asymmetric cost pass-through of EU emissions allowances: Examining wholesale electricity prices in Germany , 2008 .