Gender and lexical access in Italian

Two new procedures were employed to investigate the effects of semantic and grammatical gender on lexical access in Italian and to investigate the interaction of gender with other factors that are known to influence lexical access in other languages. The gender-monitoring task requires a conscious decision about the gender of each noun, whereas the word repetition task does not require explicit attention to gender. In both tasks, single words are presented out of context, under speeded conditions. Both procedures proved to be sensitive indices of word recognition, with reaction times that are closely tied to the point at which words can be uniquely identified (although some processing before and after the uniqueness point was seen). In both tasks, reaction times were strongly affected by phonological factors (e.g., length, number of syllables, and presence of frication on the initial consonant). Phonological transparency of gender marking had a reliable effect on gender monitoring but had no effect on word repetition, suggesting that explicit attention to gender may be a factor affecting utilization of this phonological cue. Semantic factors (including semantic gender) had no effect on performance. Frequency and age of acquisition had very small effects when other factors were controlled. Implications for current models of lexical access are discussed, with special reference to the role of gender.

[1]  Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften,et al.  The Child's construction of language , 1981 .

[2]  M. Radeau,et al.  The uniqueness point effect in the shadowing of spoken words , 1989, Speech Commun..

[3]  F. Grosjean,et al.  The gender-marking effect in spoken word recognition , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  Louisa M. Slowiaczek,et al.  Semantic priming in a single-word shadowing task , 1994 .

[5]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access , 1991 .

[6]  L B Leonard,et al.  Toward mastery of Italian morphology: a cross-sectional study , 1993, Journal of Child Language.

[7]  R. Taraban,et al.  Language learning: Cues or rules? , 1989 .

[8]  W. Deutsch,et al.  The article’s noun and the noun’s article: explorations into the representation and access of linguistic gender in Dutch , 1985 .

[9]  A. D. Friederici,et al.  Processing Articles and Pronouns in Agrammatic Aphasia: Evidence from French , 1994, Brain and Language.

[10]  Fodor Istvan,et al.  The origin of grammatical gender , 1959 .

[11]  G. Altmann Cognitive models of speech processing , 1991 .

[12]  J. Vizmuller-Zocco,et al.  Lessico di frequenza dell'italiano parlato , 1994 .

[13]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[14]  M. C. Caselli,et al.  The use of articles by Italian-speaking children with specific language impairment , 1993 .

[15]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words , 1991 .

[16]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Do we know how people identify spoken words , 1988 .

[17]  Catriona M. Morrison,et al.  Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[18]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[19]  M. Taft,et al.  Exploring the cohort model of spoken word recognition , 1986, Cognition.

[20]  P. Bertelson,et al.  The effect of the uniqueness point in spoken-word recognition , 1989, Psychological research.

[21]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Functionalism and the competition model , 1989 .

[22]  A. Mills The Acquisition of Gender , 2022, Studies in Bilingualism.

[23]  M. H. Kelly,et al.  Phonological information for grammatical category assignments , 1991 .

[24]  David A. Balota,et al.  Visual Word Recognition: The Journey from Features to Meaning (A Travel Update) , 2006 .

[25]  Patricia J. Brooks,et al.  Acquisition of Gender-like Noun Subclasses in an Artificial Language: The Contribution of Phonological Markers to Learning , 1993 .

[26]  E. Bates,et al.  Gender priming in Italian , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  G. Dell,et al.  Stages of lexical access in language production , 1992, Cognition.

[28]  B. MacWhinney The Acquisition Of Morphophonology , 1978 .

[29]  D. Whalen Subcategorical phonetic mismatches and lexical access , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  Lorraine Komisarjevsky Tyler,et al.  Spoken word recognition , 1987 .

[31]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  J. McQueen,et al.  Max-Planck-Institute for Psycholinguistics: Annual Report Nr.16 1995 , 1995 .

[33]  R. Mulford,et al.  Comprehension of Icelandic pronoun gender: semantic versus formal factors , 1985, Journal of Child Language.

[34]  J. Segui,et al.  Grammatical incongruency and vocabulary types , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[35]  Laurence B. Leonard,et al.  Morphological Deficits in Children With Specific Language Impairment: The Status of Features in the Underlying Grammar , 1992 .

[36]  F Grosjean,et al.  Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  Contents of volume VIII , 1959 .