BRCA1/2 mutations and triple negative breast cancers.

Identifying breast cancer patients at increased risk for carrying a mutation in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes is an important objective in clinical practice. Although age at diagnosis, family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, and ethnicity are all essential parameters to consider when assessing risk, there are limitations as to how well such factors accurately predict BRCA1/2 status, even when quantitative risk models are applied. Integrating information about triple negative (TN) disease may help refine these estimates. Among newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, fewer than 10% have a mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, and up to 20% present However, among BRCA1 mutation carriers at least one-third have TN breast cancers. In this paper, we review key studies that have assessed breast cancer cases with a known BRCA1/2 status and triple marker data. We also discuss how integrating such information into qualitative and quantitative risk assessments of BRCA1/2 carrier probability may improve the ability to identify women who are appropriate candidates for genetic testing. Identifying women at increased risk is critical as knowledge of mutation status may impact surgical and systemic treatment in newly diagnosed patients, as well as recommendations for ovarian cancer risk management.

[1]  J. Kwon,et al.  Expanding the criteria for BRCA mutation testing in breast cancer survivors. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  A. Tan,et al.  Iniparib, a PARP1 inhibitor for the potential treatment of cancer, including triple-negative breast cancer. , 2010, IDrugs : the investigational drugs journal.

[3]  Rosalind Eeles,et al.  Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality. , 2010, JAMA.

[4]  A. Tutt,et al.  Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and recurrent ovarian cancer: a proof-of-concept trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[5]  A. Vargas,et al.  The contribution of breast cancer pathology to statistical models to predict mutation risk in BRCA carriers , 2010, Familial Cancer.

[6]  Susan M. Domchek,et al.  Predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers: comparison of PENN II model to previous study , 2010, Familial Cancer.

[7]  F. Fostira,et al.  Prevalence of BRCA1 mutations among 284 women with triple-negative breast cancer. , 2010 .

[8]  J. Baselga,et al.  High prevalence of BRCA1/2 germline mutations in female breast cancer patients with triple-negative phenotype (TNBC) and family history. , 2010 .

[9]  T. Rebbeck,et al.  Incorporating tumour pathology information into breast cancer risk prediction algorithms , 2010, Breast Cancer Research.

[10]  S. Gruber,et al.  Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian. , 2010, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[11]  Z. Szallasi,et al.  Efficacy of neoadjuvant Cisplatin in triple-negative breast cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  J. Lubiński,et al.  Pathologic complete response rates in young women with BRCA1-positive breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  U. Bick,et al.  Contralateral breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  A. Kwong,et al.  Clinical and pathological characteristics of Chinese patients with BRCA related breast cancer , 2009, The HUGO Journal.

[15]  N Harbeck,et al.  Triple-negative breast cancer--current status and future directions. , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[16]  C. Caldas,et al.  Triple negative breast cancers: clinical and prognostic implications. , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[17]  Gorovenko Ng,et al.  Breast cancer immunohistochemical features in young women with BRCA 1/2 mutations. , 2009 .

[18]  S. Teo,et al.  Clinical and Pathologic Differences Between BRCA1-, BRCA2-, and Non-BRCA-Associated Breast Cancers in a Multiracial Developing Country , 2009, World Journal of Surgery.

[19]  E A Jones,et al.  Addition of pathology and biomarker information significantly improves the performance of the Manchester scoring system for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing , 2009, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[20]  J. Kładny,et al.  Response to neoadjuvant therapy with cisplatin in BRCA1-positive breast cancer patients , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[21]  I. Ellis,et al.  Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Distinguishing between Basal and Nonbasal Subtypes , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[22]  Stephanie A Cohen,et al.  The prevalence of BRCA1 mutations among young women with triple-negative breast cancer , 2009, BMC Cancer.

[23]  Christopher I Amos,et al.  Clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients with BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative breast cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  Z. Shao,et al.  The prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in high-risk breast cancer patients of Chinese Han nationality: two recurrent mutations were identified , 2008, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[25]  R. Eeles,et al.  Predicting the likelihood of carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: validation of BOADICEA, BRCAPRO, IBIS, Myriad and the Manchester scoring system using data from UK genetics clinics , 2008, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[26]  G. Parmigiani,et al.  Incorporating tumor immunohistochemical markers in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carrier prediction , 2008, Breast Cancer Research.

[27]  J. Lubiński,et al.  Response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in women with BRCA1-positive breast cancers , 2008, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[28]  Leif E. Peterson,et al.  Validity of Models for Predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[29]  Julie O. Culver,et al.  Limited family structure and BRCA gene mutation status in single cases of breast cancer. , 2007, JAMA.

[30]  A. Musolino,et al.  BRCA mutations, molecular markers, and clinical variables in early-onset breast cancer: a population-based study. , 2007, Breast.

[31]  Giovanni Parmigiani,et al.  Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  J. Weidhaas,et al.  Locoregional relapse and distant metastasis in conservatively managed triple negative early-stage breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  A. Nixon,et al.  The prevalence of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in young women with breast cancer undergoing breast-conservation therapy. , 2006, American journal of surgery.

[34]  J. Benítez,et al.  Histopathology of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast cancer. , 2006, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[35]  S. Schnitt,et al.  Prevalence of BRCA1 mutations in triple negative breast cancer (BC). , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[36]  O. Olopade,et al.  Tamoxifen and contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers: An update , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[37]  B. Mukesh,et al.  Optimal selection of individuals for BRCA mutation testing: a comparison of available methods. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  D. Easton,et al.  Contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ‐line mutations to the incidence of breast cancer in young women: Results from a prospective population‐based study in France , 2005, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[39]  N. Rahman,et al.  Update on the Manchester Scoring System for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing , 2005, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[40]  N. Rahman,et al.  A new scoring system for the chances of identifying a BRCA1/2 mutation outperforms existing models including BRCAPRO , 2004, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[41]  C. Magnant,et al.  Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 counseling and testing on newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[42]  M. J. van de Vijver,et al.  The pathology of familial breast cancer: predictive value of immunohistochemical markers estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2, and p53 in patients with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[43]  J. Sng,et al.  Pathological features and BRCA1 mutation screening in premenopausal breast cancer patients. , 2001, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[44]  D. Birnbaum,et al.  Major improvement in the efficacy of BRCA1 mutation screening using morphoclinical features of breast cancer. , 2000, Cancer research.

[45]  J Chang-Claude,et al.  Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.