Efficiency of visual selection in duplex and conjunction conditions in partial report

Factors that determine the efficiency of visual selection were investigated in two precued partial-report experiments. There were four selection conditions: acolor condition (e.g., selecting purple letters among blue letters), aclass condition (e.g., selecting letters among digits), aduplex condition (e.g., selecting purple letters among blue digits; that is, the targets differed from the distractors both in color and in alphanumeric class), and aconjunction condition (e.g., selecting purple letters among blue letters and purple digits; that is, the targets differed from the distractors either in color or in alphanumeric class). The efficiency of visual selection was highest in the duplex condition and lowest in the conjunction condition. Thedifference in performance across the different selection conditions within subjects was accounted for by variation in the value of a single parameter of the fixed-capacity independent race model (FIRM) proposed by Shibuya and Bundesen (1988), which assumes independent parallel processing, limitations in both processing capacity and storage capacity, and time-invariant selectivity. By assuming that the factors that determine the efficiency of selection in the color and class conditions also underlie the efficiency of selection in the duplex and conjunction conditions, an extension of FIRM, FIRM+, accounted for therelationship with respect to efficiency of selection among the different conditions.

[1]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Coding visual images of objects in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[3]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited , 1990 .

[4]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[5]  G. Sperling A Model for Visual Memory Tasks1 , 1963, Human factors.

[6]  C Bundesen,et al.  Measuring efficiency of selection from briefly exposed visual displays: a model for partial report. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  C Bundesen,et al.  Visual selection from multielement displays: measuring and modeling effects of exposure duration. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  David E. Rumelhart,et al.  A multicomponent theory of the perception of briefly exposed visual displays , 1970 .

[9]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  C. Bundesen A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[11]  A. Treisman Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[12]  J T Townsend,et al.  Experimental test of contemporary mathematical models of visual letter recognition. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[15]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Visual search for targets defined by combinations of color, shape, and size: An examination of the task constraints on feature and conjunction searches , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Mathematical models of recognition and confusion in psychology , 1983 .

[18]  James T. Townsend Some characteristics of visual whole report behavior , 1981 .

[19]  Hitomi Shibuya,et al.  Comparison Between Stochastic Models for Visual Selection , 1991 .

[20]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior , 1959 .

[21]  A. Treisman Variations on the theme of feature integration: Reply to Navon (1990). , 1990 .

[22]  C Bundesen,et al.  Visual attention: Race models for selection from multielement displays , 1987, Psychological research.

[23]  G. Sperling,et al.  Successive approximations to a model for short term memory. , 1967, Acta psychologica.