Fusion of High-Order and Low-Order Effective Connectivity Networks for MCI Classification

Functional connectivity network derived from resting-state fMRI data has been found as effective biomarkers for identifying patients with mild cognitive impairment from healthy elderly. However, the ordinary functional connectivity network is essentially a low-order network with the assumption that the brain is static during the entire scanning period, ignoring the temporal variations among correlations derived from brain region pairs. To overcome this weakness, we proposed a new type of high-order network to more accurately describe the relationship of temporal variations among brain regions. Specifically, instead of the commonly used undirected pairwise Pearson's correlation coefficient, we first estimated the low-order effective connectivity network based on a novel sparse regression algorithm. By using the similar approach, we then constructed the high-order effective connectivity network from low-order connectivity to incorporate signal flow information among the brain regions. We finally combined the low-order and the high-order effective connectivity networks using two decision trees for MCI classification and experimental results obtained demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method over the conventional undirected low-order and high-order functional connectivity networks, as well as the low-order and high-order effective connectivity networks when they were used separately.

[1]  J. Morris,et al.  Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. , 2001, Archives of neurology.

[2]  Daniel L. Rubin,et al.  Network Analysis of Intrinsic Functional Brain Connectivity in Alzheimer's Disease , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[3]  Daoqiang Zhang,et al.  Identification of MCI individuals using structural and functional connectivity networks , 2012, NeuroImage.

[4]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[5]  J. H. Ward Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function , 1963 .

[6]  Daoqiang Zhang,et al.  Brain Connectivity Hyper-Network for MCI Classification , 2014, MICCAI.

[7]  Moo K. Chung,et al.  Sparse Brain Network Recovery Under Compressed Sensing , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Gang Li,et al.  High‐order resting‐state functional connectivity network for MCI classification , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[9]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Sparse temporally dynamic resting-state functional connectivity networks for early MCI identification , 2016, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[10]  R. Petersen,et al.  Mild cognitive impairment , 2006, The Lancet.

[11]  Tingwen Huang,et al.  Time-Varying System Identification Using an Ultra-Orthogonal Forward Regression and Multiwavelet Basis Functions With Applications to EEG , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[12]  Daoqiang Zhang,et al.  Constrained Sparse Functional Connectivity Networks for MCI Classification , 2012, MICCAI.

[13]  M. V. D. Heuvel,et al.  Exploring the brain network: A review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity , 2010, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[14]  M K Habib,et al.  Dynamics of neuronal firing correlation: modulation of "effective connectivity". , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Larry A. Rendell,et al.  The Feature Selection Problem: Traditional Methods and a New Algorithm , 1992, AAAI.

[16]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Resting-State Multi-Spectrum Functional Connectivity Networks for Identification of MCI Patients , 2012, PloS one.