The detection rates and tumor clinical/pathological stages of whole-body FDG-PET cancer screening

Objective: FDG-PET has been used for cancer screening, mainly in East-Asia, and cancers are found not infrequently. However, their stages have not been clarified. We examined the detection rates of various cancers using whole-body PET for the screening of cancers in asymptomatic individuals, focusing on their clinical and pathological stages.Methods: Whole-body PET was obtained as a part of our cancer screening program among 3,426 healthy subjects. All subjects participated in a course of PET examination in conjunction with conventional examinations including a medical questionnaire, tumor markers, immunological fecal occult blood test, neck and abdominal ultrasonography and whole body computed tomography. A diagnosis and staging was obtained by an analysis of the pathological findings or by an analysis of the clinical follow-up data.Results: Malignant tumors were discovered in 65 lesions found in 3,426 participants (1.90%). The PET findings were true-positive in 46 of the 65 cancer cases. The cancers were found in the following organs: the colon 14; thyroid gland 10; stomach 7; lung 5; liver 3; breast 2; and one each in the kidney, gallbladder, esophagus, pancreas and retroperitoneum. The stages were as follows: stage 0 5, stage I 17, stage II 10, stage III 7, and stage IV 6. One was an unknown primary. There were 19 false-negative findings (0.6%) on PET. Six cancers (0.18%) were missed in our screening program.Conclusions: PET imaging has the potential to detect a wide variety of cancers at potentially curative stages. Most PET-negative cancers are early stage cancers, and thus can be detected using other conventional examinations such as endoscopy.

[1]  W. Chung,et al.  Ultrasonographic Mass Screening for Thyroid Carcinoma: A Study in Women Scheduled to Undergo a Breast Examination , 2001, Surgery Today.

[2]  Richard A. Szucs,et al.  TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. 5th ed , 1998 .

[3]  R. Milne,et al.  A Delphi study to establish national cost-effectiveness research priorities for positron emission tomography. , 1999, European journal of radiology.

[4]  D. Carter TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors , 1998 .

[5]  L. Friberg,et al.  18F-FDG whole body positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with unknown primary tumours (UPT). , 1999, European journal of cancer.

[6]  B. Nowak,et al.  Diagnosis and staging of head and neck cancer: a comparison of modern imaging modalities (positron emission tomography, computed tomography, color-coded duplex sonography) with panendoscopic and histopathologic findings. , 2000, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[7]  S. Nordling,et al.  Prognostic Factors in Papillary Thyroid Cancer: An Evaluation of 601 Consecutive Patients , 2005, Tumor Biology.

[8]  Y. Chung,et al.  F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography and the Prognosis of Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma , 1997 .

[9]  T. Jones,et al.  Can positron emission tomography (PET) be used to detect subclinical response to cancer therapy? The EC PET Oncology Concerted Action and the EORTC PET Study Group. , 1995, European journal of cancer.

[10]  D Delbeke,et al.  Oncological applications of FDG PET imaging: brain tumors, colorectal cancer, lymphoma and melanoma. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  A. Vade,et al.  Evaluation of image quality using 1∶1 pitch and 1.5∶1 pitch helical CT in children: a comparative study , 1996, Pediatric Radiology.

[12]  R. Wahl,et al.  Detection of unexpected additional primary malignancies with PET/CT. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  FDG PET imaging of locally advanced gastric carcinomas: correlation with endoscopic and histopathological findings , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[14]  S. Yasuda,et al.  Cancer screening with whole-body F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography , 1997, The Lancet.

[15]  R. Hustinx,et al.  Oncological applications of positron emission tomography with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose , 1996, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  Hironobu Ohmatsu,et al.  Screening for lung cancer with low-dose helical computed tomography: anti-lung cancer association project. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  J. Itami,et al.  FDG-PET for predicting the prognosis of malignant lymphoma , 1994, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[18]  T. M. Guerrero,et al.  Characterization of a whole body imaging technique for PET , 1990 .

[19]  H. Yagata,et al.  Predicting the prognoses of breast carcinoma patients with positron emission tomography using 2‐deoxy‐2‐fluoro[18F]‐D‐glucose , 1998, Cancer.

[20]  G. Zulian,et al.  Multiple malignant tumours in the elderly. , 2002, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[21]  Y. Nishiyama,et al.  FDG PET as a procedure for detecting simultaneous tumours in head and neck cancer patients , 2005, Nuclear medicine communications.

[22]  A. Buck,et al.  Whole-body PET: physiological and artifactual fluorodeoxyglucose accumulations. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  M. Ide Cancer screening with FDG-PET. , 2006, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of....

[24]  Liang-Kuang Chen,et al.  Application of PET and PEt/CT imaging for cancer screening. , 2004, Anticancer research.

[25]  Y. Shen,et al.  The value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with the additional help of tumor markers in cancer screening. , 2003, Neoplasma.

[26]  N. Avril,et al.  Diagnosis and Monitoring of Urological Tumors Using Positron Emission Tomography , 2001, European Urology.

[27]  T. Naruke,et al.  Evaluation of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET scanning for pulmonary nodules less than 3 cm in diameter, with special reference to the CT images. , 2004, Lung cancer.

[28]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  PET and [18F]-FDG in oncology: a clinical update. , 1996, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[29]  S. Yasuda,et al.  Application of positron emission tomography imaging to cancer screening , 2000, British Journal of Cancer.

[30]  R P Williams,et al.  Noninvasive grading of musculoskeletal tumors using PET. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.