A Subplatooning Strategy for Safe Braking Maneuvers

Reducing the inter-vehicle separation in a platoon results in the most benefits in terms of aerodynamic savings and vehicles throughput. However, this makes braking maneuvers dangerous and leads to long stopping distances, in particular, when considering heterogeneous vehicles with different braking capacities. Even though control theoretic approaches exist for the platoon cruise operation, the scenario of sudden braking has to be designed separately as the system reaches saturation, i.e., in order to minimize the stopping distance of the platoon, the application of the maximum possible braking forces is required. This cannot be handled by standard control systems alone, since they rely on varying (control) variables/signals, which is not possible under saturation. In this paper, we are concerned with vehicles of heterogeneous braking capacity and propose a subplatooning strategy that not only guarantees a collision-free braking, but also minimizes the stopping distance. Vehicles within each subplatoon have inter-vehicle separations of below one car length, whereas the inter-subplatoon separation is increased to compensate the differences in decelerations between subplatoons. We evaluate this scheme using a realistic simulation based on complex vehicle dynamics models and a HiL (hardware in the loop) setting.

[1]  Mario Nombela,et al.  Sartre - Safe Road Trains for the Environment Reducing Fuel Consumption through Lower Aerodynamic Drag Coefficient , 2011 .

[2]  C. Bergenhem CHALLENGES OF PLATOONING ON PUBLIC MOTORWAYS , 2010 .

[3]  Fred Browand,et al.  Field Experiments Demonstrate Fuel Savings for Close-Following , 2000 .

[4]  Ahmed Benmimoun,et al.  Challenges of Platooning on Public Motorways , 2010 .

[5]  Nick Stabile,et al.  The Aerodynamic Performance of Platoons: Final Report , 1995 .

[6]  Dimos V. Dimarogonas,et al.  Nonlinear Event-Triggered Platooning Control with Exponential Convergence∗ , 2015 .

[7]  Jo Yung Wong,et al.  Theory of ground vehicles , 1978 .

[8]  J. Hedrick,et al.  String stability of interconnected systems , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference - ACC'95.

[9]  Karl Henrik Johansson,et al.  Establishing Safety for Heavy Duty Vehicle Platooning: A Game Theoretical Approach , 2011 .

[10]  Li Liu,et al.  Dynamic Modeling of Driver Control Strategy of Lane-Change Behavior and Trajectory Planning for Collision Prediction , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[11]  Alejandro Masrur,et al.  Braking in Close Following Platoons: The Law of the Weakest , 2016, 2016 Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design (DSD).

[12]  Woosuk Choi,et al.  Assessing the safety benefits due to coordination amongst vehicles during an emergency braking maneuver , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference. (Cat. No.01CH37148).

[13]  Kimihiko Nakano,et al.  Study on Emergency-Avoidance Braking for the Automatic Platooning of Trucks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[14]  Karl Henrik Johansson,et al.  Decentralized symbolic control of interconnected systems with application to vehicle platooning , 2013 .

[15]  H. Fritz,et al.  Longitudinal and lateral control of heavy duty trucks for automated vehicle following in mixed traffic: experimental results from the CHAUFFEUR project , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (Cat. No.99CH36328).

[16]  Weidong Xiang,et al.  Automobile Brake-by-Wire Control System Design and Analysis , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[17]  Karl Henrik Johansson,et al.  Heavy-Duty Vehicle Platoon Formation for Fuel Efficiency , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[18]  Karl Henrik Johansson,et al.  Fuel-efficient heavy-duty vehicle platooning by look-ahead control , 2014, 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.