Design and Experimental Results of a 300-kHz Synthetic Aperture Sonar Optimized for Shallow-Water Operations

The design of a shallow-water synthetic aperture sonar (SAS) requires an understanding of key system and environmental issues. The main factors that limit SAS performance are as follows: micronavigation accuracy, where micronavigation is defined as the problem of estimating the acoustic path lengths to allow the focusing of the aperture; multipath effects; and target view angle changes. All of them can degrade shadow classification performance. Micronavigation accuracy is successfully addressed by the gyrostabilized displaced phase center antenna technique, which combines data-driven motion estimates with external attitude sensors. Multipath effects in shallow water are effectively countered by narrow vertical beams. Shadow blur induced by view angle changes is mitigated by increasing the center frequency, to reduce the SAS integration length while still maintaining the desired resolution and by designing the system with a minimum grazing angle of about 6deg to reduce shadow length. The combination of these factors led to the choice of a 300-kHz center frequency and of a multipath mitigation scheme that uses multiple vertical beams. Experimental results obtained with a sonar incorporating these features have produced SAS images with 1.6 cm times 5 cm resolution in range times cross-range and shadow contrast in excess of 5 dB, at ranges of up to 170 m in 20 m of water.

[1]  R.E. Hansen,et al.  Signal processing for AUV based interferometric synthetic aperture sonar , 2003, Oceans 2003. Celebrating the Past ... Teaming Toward the Future (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37492).

[2]  Peter T. Gough,et al.  Imaging algorithms for a strip-map synthetic aperture sonar: minimizing the effects of aperture errors and aperture undersampling , 1997 .

[3]  A. Bellettini,et al.  Theoretical accuracy of synthetic aperture sonar micronavigation using a displaced phase-center antenna , 2002 .

[4]  A. Bellettini,et al.  InSAS'00: interferometric SAS and INS aided SAS imaging , 2001, MTS/IEEE Oceans 2001. An Ocean Odyssey. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37295).

[5]  A. Bellettini,et al.  A New Synthetic Aperture Sonar Design with Multipath Mitigation , 2005 .

[6]  Louis J. Cutrona,et al.  Comparison of sonar system performance achievable using synthetic‐aperture techniques with the performance achievable by more conventional means , 1975 .

[7]  R.E. Hansen,et al.  Synthetic aperture sonar processing for the HUGIN AUV , 2005, Europe Oceans 2005.

[8]  Charles V. Jakowatz,et al.  Spotlight-Mode Synthetic Aperture Radar: A Signal Processing Approach , 1996 .

[9]  Franck Florin,et al.  Effets d'échos et d'ombres differentiels sur les antennes de sonar actif en champ de fresnel , 1993 .

[10]  Henry M. Gruen Environmentally adaptive sonar system , 2002 .

[11]  F. Florin,et al.  SAS and vehicle stability constraints , 2005, Europe Oceans 2005.

[12]  A. Bellettini EFFECT OF MULTIPATH ON SYNTHETIC APERTURE SONAR , 2003 .

[13]  J. N. Morrison,et al.  Gambit MCM AUV: overview and system performance , 2003, Oceans 2003. Celebrating the Past ... Teaming Toward the Future (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37492).

[14]  R. Stephenson A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  Johannes Groen,et al.  Adaptive motion compensation in sonar array processing , 2006 .

[16]  John D. Lathrop,et al.  High-frequency/low-frequency synthetic aperture sonar , 1997, Defense, Security, and Sensing.