Applied Behavior Analysis: New Directions from the Laboratory

Applied behavior analysis began when laboratory based principles were extended to humans inorder to change socially significant behavior. Recent laboratory findings may have applied relevance; however, the majority of basic researchers have not clearly communicated the practical implications of their work. The present paper samples some of the new findings and attempts to demonstrate their applied importance. Schedule-induced behavior which occurs as a by-product of contingencies of reinforcement is discussed. Possible difficulties in treatment and management of induced behaviors are considered. Next, the correlation-based law of effect and the implications of relative reinforcement are explored in terms of applied examples. Relative rate of reinforcement is then extended to the literature dealing with concurrent operants. Concurrent operant models may describe human behavior of applied importance, and several techniques for modification of problem behavior are suggested. As a final concern, the paper discusses several new paradigms. While the practical importance of these models is not clear at the moment, it may be that new practical advantages will soon arise. Thus, it is argued that basic research continues to be of theoretical and practical importance to applied behavior analysis.

[1]  D M Baer,et al.  A Flight of Behavior Analysis , 1981, The Behavior analyst.

[2]  J Mendelson,et al.  Schedule-induced air licking in rats. , 1970, Physiology & behavior.

[3]  A H Crisp,et al.  Clinical features of anorexia nervosa. A study of a consecutive series of 102 female patients. , 1980, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[4]  Donald H. Loveland,et al.  Matching when the number of response alternatives is large , 1974 .

[5]  L. Harris,et al.  Schedule-induced oral narcotic self-administration: acute and chronic effects. , 1975, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[6]  N H Azrin,et al.  OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR ATTACK PRODUCED BY INTERMITTENT REINFORCEMENT OF A CONCURRENT OPERANT RESPONSE ' , 2022 .

[7]  J D Findley,et al.  Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling. , 1958, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  Randall K. Flory,et al.  The control of schedule-induced polydipsia: Frequency and magnitude of reinforcement , 1971 .

[9]  R Flory,et al.  Attack behavior as a function of minimum inter-food interval. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  S C Hayes,et al.  The technical drift of applied behavior analysis. , 1980, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[11]  Samuel M. Deitz,et al.  Current Status of Applied Behavior Analysis: Science Versus Technology. , 1978 .

[12]  J Deweese,et al.  Schedule-induced biting under fixed-interval schedules of food or electric-shock presentation. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  M. Wolf,et al.  Good behavior game: effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. , 1969, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[14]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  The effect of signaled reinforcement availability on concurrent performances in humans. , 1979, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[15]  T. Thompson,et al.  Aggressive behavior and extinction-induced response-rate increase , 1966 .

[16]  J. Falk,et al.  The origin and functions of adjunctive behavior , 1977 .

[17]  Lee W. Frederiksen,et al.  Schedule-Induced Aggression in Nursery School Children , 1974 .

[18]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  The effect of punishment on free-operant choice behavior in humans. , 1979, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[19]  R J Herrnstein,et al.  Formal properties of the matching law. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[20]  G. Singer,et al.  Self administration of nicotine with and without a food delivery schedule , 1977, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[21]  R J HERRNSTEIN,et al.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[22]  T A Looney,et al.  Schedule-induced mirror responding in the pigeon. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[23]  G. Singer,et al.  Adjunctive behavior and smoking induced by a maze solving schedule in humans , 1976, Physiology & Behavior.

[24]  D M Baer,et al.  Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. , 1968, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[25]  J Q Simmons,et al.  Manipulation of self-destruction in three retarded children. , 1969, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[26]  J J McDowell,et al.  The importance of Herrnstein's mathematical statement of the law of effect for behavior therapy. , 1982, The American psychologist.

[27]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  Behavior of humans in variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[28]  Israel Goldiamond,et al.  Alternative sets as a framework for behavioral formulations and research. , 1975 .

[29]  J L Katz,et al.  Hyperactivity in anorexia nervosa: a fundamental clinical feature. , 1978, Comprehensive psychiatry.

[30]  Jack Michael,et al.  Flight From Behavior Analysis Presidential Address ABA 1980 , 1980 .

[31]  Lee W. Frederiksen,et al.  Schedule‐induced aggression in humans and animals: A comparative parametric review , 1977 .

[32]  W D Pierce,et al.  Choice, Matching, and Human Behavior: A Review of the Literature , 1983, The Behavior analyst.

[33]  D M Baer,et al.  The development of imitation by reinforcing behavioral similarity to a model. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[34]  W D Pierce,et al.  What Happened to Analysis in Applied Behavior Analysis? , 1980, The Behavior analyst.

[35]  D. Lester,et al.  Schedule-induced consumption of ethanol: calories or chemotherapy? , 1970, Physiology & behavior.

[36]  A. Bandura Social learning theory , 1977 .

[37]  B. Skinner,et al.  Science and human behavior , 1953 .

[38]  J. Falk,et al.  Schedule-induced polydipsia as a function of fixed interval length. , 1966, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[39]  Ann Sanson,et al.  Adjunctive behavior in humans on a food delivery schedule , 1978, Physiology & Behavior.

[40]  D F Hake,et al.  Extinction-induced aggression. , 1966, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[41]  Randall K. Flory,et al.  The effect of a response requirement on schedule-induced aggression , 1977 .

[42]  C. B. Ferster,et al.  Schedules of reinforcement , 1957 .

[43]  W M Baum,et al.  Time allocation in human vigilance. , 1975, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[44]  W. Pierce,et al.  The Matching Law and Bias in a Social Exchange Involving Choice between Alternatives , 1982 .

[45]  H. Rachlin Introduction to modern behaviorism , 1970 .

[46]  Barbara B. Ellis,et al.  Schedule-induced aggression against a slide-image target , 1973 .

[47]  R. Conger,et al.  Child Abuse Related to Life Change and Perceptions of Illness: Some Preliminary Findings. , 1979 .

[48]  R. Meisch,et al.  Self-administration of Pentobarbital by means of schedule-induced polydipsia , 1969 .

[49]  A. Poling,et al.  The Schism Between Experimental and Applied Behavior Analysis: Is It Real and Who Cares? , 1981, The Behavior analyst.

[50]  D M Baer,et al.  Effect of contingent and non-contingent social reinforcement on the cooperative play of a preschool child. , 1968, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[51]  R. W. Schaeffer,et al.  The effect of FR response requirement on aggressive behavior in rats , 1969 .

[52]  W S Foster Adjunctive behavior: an under-reported phenomenon in applied behavior analysis? , 1978, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[53]  J. Staddon,et al.  The "supersitition" experiment: A reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior. , 1971 .

[54]  J G Holland,et al.  Operant control of eye movements. , 1968, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[55]  David A. Levitsky,et al.  Schedule-induced wheel running , 1968 .

[56]  R. Conger,et al.  Use of Concurrent Operants in Small Group Research , 1974 .

[57]  S S Pliskoff,et al.  Matching with a trio of concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[58]  W M Baum,et al.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[59]  R J Herrnstein,et al.  Negative reinforcement as shock-frequency reduction. , 1966, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[60]  W M Baum,et al.  The correlation-based law of effect. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[61]  W. David Pierce,et al.  A theory of activity-based anorexia , 1983 .

[62]  F. Keller "Good-bye, teacher...". , 1968, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[63]  J. Falk,et al.  Pattern of daily blood ethanol elevation and the development of physical dependence , 1975, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[64]  T. Risley,et al.  The effects and side effects of punishing the autistic behaviors of a deviant child. , 1968, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[65]  R. Herrnstein On the law of effect. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[66]  J. Falk The nature and determinants of adjunctive behavior. , 1971, Physiology & behavior.