Age-related differences in selection by visual saliency

We examined the ability of older adults to select local and global stimuli varying in perceptual saliency—a task requiring nonspatial visual selection. Participants were asked to identify in separate blocks a target at either the global or the local level of a hierarchical stimulus, while the saliency of each level was varied (across different conditions, either the local or the global form was the more salient and relatively easier to identify). Older adults were less efficient than young adults in ignoring distractors that were higher in saliency than were targets, and this occurred across both the global and local levels of form. The increased effects of distractor saliency on older adults occurred even when the effects were scaled by overall differences in task performance. The data provide evidence for an age-related decline in nonspatial attentional selection of low-salient hierarchical stimuli, not determined by the (global or local) level at which selection was required. We discuss the implications of these results for understanding both the interaction between saliency and hierarchical processing and the effects of aging on nonspatial visual attention.

[1]  P. Baltes,et al.  Sensory functioning and intelligence in old age: a strong connection. , 1994, Psychology and aging.

[2]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[3]  M. Nicholls,et al.  The nature and contribution of space- and object-based attentional biases to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Age Differences in the Control of Looking Behavior: Do You Know Where Your Eyes Have Been? , 2000, Psychological science.

[5]  L Hasher,et al.  Age and inhibition. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Task-independent and task-specific age effects on brain activity during working memory, visual attention and episodic retrieval. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  G. Humphreys,et al.  An analysis of the time course of attention in preview search , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  David J. Madden,et al.  Searching from the Top Down: Ageing and Attentional Guidance during Singleton Detection , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[9]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Parallel Distractor Rejection as a Binding Mechanism in Search , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[10]  David J Madden,et al.  Overriding age differences in attentional capture with top-down processing. , 2007, Psychology and aging.

[11]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Bihemispheric Leftward Bias in a Visuospatial Attention-Related Network , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Arthur Wingfield,et al.  Distraction by competing speech in young and older adult listeners. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[13]  Jeffrey W. Cooney,et al.  Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  The Left Intraparietal Sulcus Modulates the Selection of Low Salient Stimuli , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Derrick G. Watson,et al.  Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  K Zilles,et al.  A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of local/global processing with stimulus presentation in the peripheral visual hemifields , 2004, Neuroscience.

[17]  D. Burke Language, aging, and inhibitory deficits: evaluation of a theory. , 1997, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[18]  Carrick C. Williams,et al.  Stroop Interference, Practice, and Aging , 2003, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.

[19]  D. G. MacKay,et al.  Memory, language, and ageing. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[20]  J. Theeuwes Irrelevant Singletons Capture Attention , 2005 .

[21]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[22]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: Evidence from a probe detection analysis of preview search , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Attentional capture and aging: implications for visual search performance and oculomotor control. , 1999, Psychology and aging.

[24]  Elizabeth A. Maylor,et al.  Age-related deficits in efficiency of low-level lateral inhibition , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[25]  R. West,et al.  Stroop color-word interference and electroencephalogram activation: evidence for age-related decline of the anterior attention system. , 1997, Neuropsychology.

[26]  J. Theeuwes Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective Attention and Priming: Inhibitory and Facilitatory Effects of Ignored Primes , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[28]  P. Matthews,et al.  A neural marker of content-specific active ignoring. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Roberto Cabeza,et al.  Age-related preservation of top-down attentional guidance during visual search. , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[30]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[31]  M. Ceccaldi,et al.  Does Aging Affect the Allocation of Visual Attention in Global and Local Information Processing? , 2001, Brain and Cognition.

[32]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Visual marking inhibits singleton capture , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  Carmel Mevorach,et al.  Attending to local form while ignoring global aspects depends on handedness: evidence from TMS , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  A. Pfefferbaum,et al.  Local–global interference is modulated by age, sex and anterior corpus callosum size , 2007, Brain Research.

[35]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Neurobiology of Attention , 2005 .

[36]  Carmel Mevorach,et al.  Opposite biases in salience-based selection for the left and right posterior parietal cortex , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  Carmel Mevorach,et al.  Ignoring the Elephant in the Room: A Neural Circuit to Downregulate Salience , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. , 1997, Psychological review.

[39]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  D. Plude Chapter 24 Aging, Feature Integration, and Visual Selective Attention , 1990 .

[41]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[42]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Inhibitory deficit theory: Recent developments in a "new view" , 2007 .

[43]  Carmel Mevorach,et al.  Driven to less distraction: rTMS of the right parietal cortex reduces attentional capture in visual search. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  Harriet A. Allen,et al.  Similar behaviour, different brain patterns: Age-related changes in neural signatures of ignoring , 2012, NeuroImage.

[45]  Derrick G. Watson,et al.  Aging and visual marking: selective deficits for moving stimuli. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[46]  D. Balota,et al.  Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[48]  T. Salthouse Aging and measures of processing speed , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[49]  Raymond Bruyer,et al.  Aging and the Locus of the Global Precedence Effect: A Short Review and New Empirical Data , 2003, Experimental aging research.

[50]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[51]  C Alain,et al.  Age-related decline in inhibitory control contributes to the increased Stroop effect observed in older adults. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[52]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Effects of saliency, not global dominance, in patients with left parietal damage , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  S. Connelly,et al.  Aging, distraction, and the benefits of predictable location. , 1995, Psychology and aging.

[54]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Reflexive and Preparatory Selection and Suppression of Salient Information in the Right and Left Posterior Parietal Cortex , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[55]  D. Mewhort,et al.  Analysis of Response Time Distributions: An Example Using the Stroop Task , 1991 .

[56]  Julia Spaniol,et al.  Age-related increase in top-down activation of visual features , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[57]  David J. Madden,et al.  Aging and Visual Attention , 2007, Current directions in psychological science.

[58]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Que PASA? The posterior-anterior shift in aging. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[59]  D J Madden,et al.  Adult age differences in visual search accuracy: attentional guidance and target detectability. , 1999, Psychology and aging.