International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: An Introduction for Rehabilitation Psychologists.

The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) represents a new way for rehabilitation psychologists and other health care providers to classify health and functioning. The ICF classifies functioning and disability through the constructs of Body Functions and Structures and Activities and Participation and addresses contextual influences through Environmental and Personal Factors. The ICF and its companion classification, the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, provide a complementary, broad, and meaningful picture of the health of an individual or of entire populations. Research and clinical implementation efforts suggest that the ICF is a useful and meaningful public health tool. The development of the ICF and its universe and scope of application are reviewed. Critical concepts are defined, the structure of the ICF is illustrated, and clinical‐research utility are featured in light of the ethical considerations for responsible use by rehabilitation psychologists. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF; World Health Organization [WHO], 2001) was endorsed by the 54th World Health Assembly for international use on May 22, 2001. Given its focus on health, disability, and functioning, the ICF is an important and relevant development in rehabilitation psychology practice. This article orients rehabilitation psychologists to the ICF so they can apply it to research and practice. The structure of the ICF is described, and important concepts are defined. Reviewed are related research, clinical applications, and ethical considerations associated with the use of the ICF in rehabilitation psychology and general clinical practice. The ICF is intended to be used with its companion classification, the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10; WHO, 1992). There is some overlap between the ICF and the ICD-10 in that they both classify impairments in various body systems. However, the ICD-10 provides an etiological classification of health conditions (e.g., diseases, disorders, injuries), whereas the ICF offers a framework for conceptualizing functioning and disability associated with health conditions. Disease may manifest itself differently in two individuals, and similar functioning does not necessarily imply similar health conditions. Thus, together the ICD-10 and the ICF yield a complementary, broad, and meaningful picture of the health of an individual or of entire populations. Health outcomes data gleaned from the ICF can be used in tandem with ICD-10 mortality data to monitor the health of international populations, allowing a much broader picture of public health to emerge than either alone could permit. For a comprehensive review of other health status measures, the reader is referred to Stucki, Ewert, and Cieza (2003).

[1]  M. Folstein,et al.  Cognitive impairment and functional disability in the absence of psychiatric diagnosis , 1991, Psychological Medicine.

[2]  J. Ormel,et al.  Outcome of depression and anxiety in primary care. A three-wave 3 1/2-year study of psychopathology and disability. , 1993, Archives of general psychiatry.

[3]  T. Beauchamp,et al.  Principles of biomedical ethics , 1991 .

[4]  T Ewert,et al.  Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[5]  S. Segal,et al.  Factors affecting SSI support for sheltered care residents with serious mental illness. , 1991, Hospital & community psychiatry.

[6]  Robert G. Frank,et al.  Handbook of rehabilitation psychology. , 2000 .

[7]  Lynn F. Bufka,et al.  Operationalizing the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in clinical settings , 2005 .

[8]  S. Ueda,et al.  The subjective dimension of functioning and disability: what is it and what is it for? , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[9]  R. Hurst.  The International Disability Rights Movement and the ICF , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[10]  K. Kitchener.  Foundations of ethical practice, research, and teaching in psychology. , 1999 .

[11]  B. Burns,et al.  The chronically mentally ill in primary care , 1985, Psychological Medicine.

[12]  M. Folstein,et al.  Disability and psychiatric disorders in an urban community: measurement, prevalence and outcomes , 1998, Psychological Medicine.

[13]  F. Goodwin,et al.  Health care reform for Americans with severe mental illnesses: report of the National Advisory Mental Health Council. , 1993, The American journal of psychiatry.

[14]  R. Liberman,et al.  Evaluating the capacity to work of the mentally ill. , 1990, Psychiatry.

[15]  E. Behrens,et al.  [Interrater reliability of a German version of the "International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps (ICIDH)" of the World Health Organization]. , 1987, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[16]  J Ormel,et al.  Disability and depression among high utilizers of health care. A longitudinal analysis. , 1992, Archives of general psychiatry.

[17]  Raymond J. Corsini,et al.  The concise Corsini encyclopedia of psychology and behavioral science , 2004 .

[18]  Agneta Ståhl,et al.  Theoretical understanding and methodological challenges in accessibility assessments, focusing the environmental component: an example from travel chains in urban public bus transport. , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[19]  R. Califf,et al.  Medical, psychological and social correlates of work disability among men with coronary artery disease. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  Susanne M Bruyere,et al.  The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Contemporary Literature Overview. , 2005 .

[21]  T. Mayer,et al.  Psychopathology and the rehabilitation of patients with chronic low back pain disability. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  P. McCrone,et al.  Diagnosis and length of psychiatric in-patient stay , 1994, Psychological Medicine.

[23]  I. Modai,et al.  Understanding who improves after psychiatric hospitalization , 1994, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[24]  I. D. Goldberg,et al.  Diagnosis of mental disorder in adults and increased use of health services in four outpatient settings. , 1980, The American journal of psychiatry.

[25]  M. T. J. Buñuales,et al.  La clasificación internacional del funcionamiento de la discapacidad y de la salud (CIF) 2001 , 2002 .

[26]  L. Worrall,et al.  Classifying communication disability using the ICF , 2004 .

[27]  T. B. Üstün,et al.  The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a new tool for understanding disability and health , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[28]  G. Broe,et al.  Psychosocial outcome for the survivors of severe blunt head injury: the results from a consecutive series of 100 patients. , 1989, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.